Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts

Issue No. 35                        October 14 - 20,  2001                    Quezon City, Philippines







Join the Bulatlat.com mailing list!

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Political Animal
Teddy A. Casiño

________________________
Teddy Casiño is the Secretary General of the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (BAYAN, New Patriotic Alliance)

 

Basilanistan

If US Pres. George W. Bush has his “anti-terrorist war” in Afghanistan, our very own Pres. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has her own in Basilan.

With US military advisers flying in any time this month to look into the pathetic efforts of the AFP against our very own Islamic extremists, the Abu Sayyaf who, not coincidentally, have alleged connections with Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda network, it would seem that the military operations in Afghanistan and Basilan may eventually be treated as a single, contiguous war against “terrorism” and “terrorist groups.”

The Philippines, of course, has been identified by the US government as one among 50 or so countries harboring “terrorists.” Aside from the Abu Sayyaf group (ASG), the American and Philippine governments include the MILF, CPP-NPA-NDF and other revolutionary armed organizations as terrorists. (According to Prof. Roland Simbulan, US Col. James Rowe who was assassinated by NPA partisans in 1989 has, in his tombstone, the epitaph, “Gunned down by terrorists in the Philippines.”)

But if we allow National Security Adviser Roilo Golez to shoot his mouth off the way he’s been doing lately, the Arroyo government will find itself calling humanitarian aid groups, environmentalists, cause-oriented groups, Leftists and Islam associations “terrorist” or “with terrorist links,” making the Americans doubly interested in sending over their special operations forces.

Afghanistan and Basilan, though continents apart, have similarities that are simply too glaring and frightening to ignore.

For one thing, they harbor their own groups of Islamic extremists at one time directly or indirectly trained, organized, funded and armed by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). In Afghanistan, this would be the Taliban and bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda which were instrumental in repulsing the Soviet invaders at a time when the USSR was still considered the US’s rival superpower.

In Basilan, it would be the ASG, whose leaders like the Janjalani brothers and Abu Sabaya cut their teeth as anti-communist Mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan in the early 80s. They were later used by the Philippine government to undermine the MILF and MNLF.

The ASG eventually engaged in banditry and kidnapping, thanks to the infiltration of corrupt deep penetration agents like Edwin Angeles, and the collusion of local government officials, officers of the AFP Southern Command and a host of notorious negotiators and brokers.

Just like the Philippine government, the US government is fighting its own monster. Bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda and the Taliban were US creations, or at least pawns in their proxy wars for control over the Middle East. The same goes for the ASG who, aside from wreaking havoc on the Bangsa Moro movement, made many military and civilian officials rich.

But in Afghanistan as in Basilan, the anti-terrorist war is gaining more sympathizers for its targets. This is because in their aim to “smoke out” the enemy from their mountain or jungle lairs, RP and US armed forces rely on naked power and brute force, resulting in the maiming and killing of many innocent civilians. In the process, they gain more enemies than friends among the populace.

In Basilan for example, the Abu Sayyaf and the AFP are equally despised. In some areas, they say the Abu Sayyaf is better because at least, they don’t bomb villages, torch or loot houses, or engage in indiscriminate arrests and torture.

In both places, there is the tendency to rely on military solutions to complex problems that have political, economic, religious and ethnic roots. Terrorism is being met with a greater, state-sponsored and superpower-backed terrorism. The result is a flawed “war against terrorism” which aggravates rather than solves the problem, making the cycle of hatred and violence even bigger.

Because the US and Philippine governments refuse to admit that they – their attitudes, policies and actions – are part of the problem, their aim is to “correct” the mistakes of the other parties, mainly through force and military action. This leads to an escalation of the conflict, resulting in the most desperate of terrorist acts from their enemies and themselves. Bulatlat.com


We want to know what you think of this article.