Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Volume 3, Number 2 February 9 -15, 2003 Quezon City, Philippines |
Artists,
Health Professionals Unite Against VAT By
implementing the twice-postponed 10 percent Value-Added Tax (VAT) on
professionals, the Macapagal-Arroyo government has earned the ire of artists –
a powerful sector in this country where popularity could sway public opinion,
and make one a president for that matter. BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO Early
in January, the Department of Finance announced that it would finally implement the 10 percent value-added tax (VAT) on artists and professionals.
The implementation of the VAT for artists and professionals under Section 5 of
the Republic Act 8424 or the Tax Reform Act of 1997 had been twice deferred due
to opposition from sectors to be affected by the measure. Once
again artists and professionals registered strong opposition to the measure.
Actors and actresses, broadcast journalists, and talk show hosts appeared on
television one Saturday wearing black to dramatize their protest.
Representatives of organizations of artists and professionals held a dialogue
with Finance Secretary Isidro Camacho. On the second anniversary of the People
Power II uprising that installed the Macapagal-Arroyo government, they held a
rally at Mendiola. Government
explanations
Camacho explained that salaried individuals have been putting up with heavier
tax burdens compared to those of artists and professionals who earn more. He
also accused these sectors of tax evasion. The
finance department also cited falling revenues as bases for implementing the
VAT for artists and professionals. The Bureau of Internal Revenue collected
P36.31 billion in 2001. The tax revenues for 2001 were P8.71 billion; in 2002
the BIR collected only P8.23 billion worth of tax revenues. Artists
and professionals are not buying these explanations, however. Health
workers speak out
"There
are a number of reasons for such dismal performance of the country's main
revenue collectors," said the Health Alliance for Democracy (HEAD), an
organization of physicians and other health workers and students of the health
sciences, in a statement Jan. 20. Citing
a Nov. 26 report from the broadsheet Philippine Star, the health
organization said that the Department of Finance itself has admitted that
government loses at least P74 billion in revenues yearly due to flaws in tax
administration and graft and corruption in its own agencies for revenue
collection. "Until
today, the government has yet to settle business tycoon Lucio Tan's P26-billion
tax evasion case," the health group said further. "This case has
spawned allegations of corruption, not only against executive and legislative
branches of government; but even the judiciary as Tan reportedly bribed the
government officials to avoid penalties." It
further explained that, "Falling government revenues can also be attributed
to government's neoliberal policiy of cutting taxes on a wide range of imported
commodities to the detriment of our heavily taxed local industries. In 2001, the
Bureau of Customs lost almost $3 billion from its level in 1996 due to various
liberalization commitments." HEAD
pointed out that by granting incentives to foreign investors, the government
"waived" more than P263 million in potential revenues from 1993 to
2000. HEAD
described the VAT as "inimical to the people's interests" and said
that "It only serves IMF-World Bank dictates to decrease the budget deficit
and pay the country's foreign debt and to satisfy further the voracious appetite
of graft and corruptors." Unity
vs. VAT
Representatives
from the health professions, broadcast media, and show business recently formed the Network Opposed to VAT (NO VAT). The
network released a statement signed by influential leaders of the movie and broadcast
industry – Joel Lamangan, Jose Javier Reyes, and Carlitos Siguion Reyna of the
Philippine Directors Guild Inc. (PDGI), Julie Po of
the Concerned Artists of the Philippines (CAP), Girlie Rodis of the
Philippine Association of Managers, Inc. (PAMI), Richard Gomez of the Katipunan
ng mga Artista ng Pelikulang Pilipino (KAPP), Mitch Valdes of the Organisasyon
ng mga Pilipinong Mang-aawit (OPM) , Celeste Legaspi of Philstage and broadcast
journalist Cito Beltran, – as well as by leaders of health professionals, Dr.
Jojo Carabeo of HEAD and Dr. Jojo Sabile of the Philippine Medical Association (PMA),
NO
VAT cited statistics showing that the country is in crisis: more than half of
the population live below the poverty line, 30 percent of children below five
years are malnourished, ten percent of the labor force are jobless, and the
national government had a budget deficit of P210 billion for 2002. "We, artists and professionals, are not spared from the adverse effects of the country's economic conditions," the signatories said. "The additional 10% VAT leveled on us will worsen rather than ease the economic crisis that now confronts our country." They further argued that the VAT would ultimately burden the end consumers, those receiving their services, since they would have to charge higher fees in consideration of the added expense. "Moreover," the signatories continued, "it can instill the commercialization of our professions, instead of strengthening its social orientation. The
group called on the government to consider other sources of revenues, such as:
NO VAT further urged the government to take steps to maintain the VAT exemptions of artists and professionals and to "immediately enact a law that will permanently exclude artists and other professionals from VAT, as well as review the injustice of the whole VAT system." Bulatlat.com We want to know what you think of this article.
|
|