The
World is His Home
Review of Jose
Maria Sison: At Home in the World – Portrait of a Revolutionary
(Conversations with Ninotchka Rosca)
Published by Open Hand Publishing House, U.S., 2004
The
book’s title, Jose Maria Sison: At
Home in the World – Portrait of a Revolutionary, is apt. This is the chronicle of a man who was banished from the
country of his birth and branded a “terrorist” because he refused to
accept its condition as a land enslaved; but who never lifted his feet
from his native land even as he is bound to the refugee’s life abroad,
and refuses to be cowed by those who seek to terrorize him by calling him
a “terrorist.”
BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
“The
personal is the political” is a favorite saying of activists and
revolutionaries. When they cite this saying, they mean that their personal
lives cannot be divorced from the march of history in which they have
chosen to play an active part.
Scheduled
for a series of book launching in the Philippines starting this week, Jose
Maria Sison: At Home in the World – Portrait of a Revolutionary
(Conversations with Ninotchka Rosca) provides a concretization of that
maxim. The book is at once biography of Jose Maria Sison – a
revolutionary intellectual touted as one of the most influential Filipinos
of the 20th century and one of the most significant Marxist
thinkers since 1848 – and history and analysis of the Philippine
national-democratic movement and the world proletarian revolutionary
movement.
The
exile’s tale
The
phrase “At Home in the World” will strike many readers as a reference
to Sison’s life as an exile in The Netherlands for almost 16 years now.
The book is a series of interviews with noted journalist and novelist
Ninotchka Rosca, who has been living in the United States since the
martial law years.
Sison
was charged by the Corazon Aquino government with subversion on Sept. 14,
1988, while he was on a lecture tour in Europe. The lecture tour was part
of a long series of trips arranged for him by the movement as part of its
international work after his release in 1986 from almost nine years of
detention.
Says
Sison in one of the interviews: “The lectures in the Philippines and
abroad had their own importance apart from the armed struggle... It was
important to speak about the Philippine revolution and seek international
support for it in various countries. People took special interest in me
then because of my record as a revolutionary leader and because of the
significance of the Philippine revolutionary movement.”
In
fact the series of trips were only temporary, since he had definite plans
of rejoining the underground. He had gone underground in 1969, the year
the New People’s Army was established. Sison recounts that after his
release from detention, “interest was high” in his “public meetings,
university lectures, seminars, press interviews and other legal
activities.” He adds: “Comrades advised me to stay aboveground for a
year or so, in order to take advantage of opportunities for open
activities in propagating the ideas and policies of the
national-democratic movement.”
But
then came the subversion charge, and two days later his passport was
cancelled. Upon the advice of comrades, he applied for political asylum in
The Netherlands. He continues activist work there as chief political
consultant of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP)
panel in the peace negotiations with the Government of the Republic of the
Philippines (GRP), as well as general consultant of the International
League of Peoples’ Struggle (ILPS).
Hard
questions
Being
an activist herself interviewing a fellow activist, Rosca admits that this
effort “could be construed” as being biased in Sison’s favor.
But
Sison also allows Rosca to ask hard questions about himself and the
national-democratic movement. The question-and-answer format of the book
lets Sison’s words flow freely, context and all: there is no danger of
being misinterpreted or deliberately misquoted as usually happens to him
in mainstream media.
Many
of the hard questions deal with his having been placed by the U.S.
government, together with the CPP-NPA, in its list of “foreign
terrorists” in late 2002 – which has increased the risks he faces as a
hunted man.
“A
revolutionary is not a terrorist,” Rosca says in her introduction to the
book. The last part consists of two appendices: one the full text of a
statement by Sison condemning the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on Sept.
11, 2001 while at the same time discoursing on the brand of terrorism
committed by the U.S. government, and an article by Rosca assailing the
U.S. listing of Sison as a “foreign terrorist.”
In
his 9-11 statement, Sison defines terrorism as “the willful and
malicious infliction and threat of death and other physical harm on
innocent civilians.” While noting that the 9-11 attack was committed in
retaliation for U.S. intervention and atrocities, he explains that it is
to be condemned like all other terrorist acts, at the same time that he
acknowledges that the U.S. imperialism has been guilty of a far more
unforgivable brand of terrorism.
“I
am sad that ordinary civilians take the main brunt of terrorist acts done
in obvious retaliation against the long history and current acts of
terrorism of U.S. imperialism,” Sison says in the statement.
“The
U.S. no doubt has been a notorious perpetrator of terrorism on a scale far
larger than what is now being alleged against the private group of Osama
bin Laden,” he adds. “But the people in the U.S. should not be
targeted for mass slaughter for the terrorist crimes of the U.S.
imperialists.”
In
one of the interviews, Rosca asks Sison: “Can one counterpoise
revolution to terrorism? How can you achieve a just and lasting peace when
the U.S. can terrorize the whole world?”
“Certainly
you can and should counterpoise revolution to terrorism,” he replies,
“whether this is the state terrorism of the imperialist powers and the
puppet states or the nongovernmental terrorism of the likes of Al Qaeda or
the Abu Sayyaf. The U.S. has practised the most reprehensible kinds of
terrorism, wars of aggression, production of weapons of mass destruction,
the atom bombing of civilian populations, the use of chemical warfare and
instigation of puppet regimes of open terror that engage in massacres and
all kinds of human rights violations.”
Supposed
to have been published in 2002, the book was temporarily swept into the
sidelines by other pressing concerns. But as the authors state in their
preface, “The delay in finishing the book has been beneficial. The time
gained allowed us to enrich the book, with questions pertaining to the
‘terrorist’ listing initiated by the U.S. and carried on further by
the Dutch government and the European Council against the subject of this
book.” That the introduction and the last parts of the book heavily deal
with the “terror” tag indicates that the book, since the delay in its
publication, had made the debunking – even ridiculing – of the
“terrorist” listing among its main goals. And all the interviews seem
to fit neatly into the pattern, never mind that it was originally
unintended.
Life
and thoughts
Sison’s
life is traced from his early years. His experiences and achievements are
shared in order to show the man for what he is: a man born under fortunate
social circumstances and with high academic and intellectual achievements,
who could have exploited all these for personal gain but chose to take
what the late Eman Lacaba termed “the road less traveled by” – the
perpetually dangerous life of a fighter for the liberation of his
compatriots and his fellow human beings.
To
reveal a more human aspect of the man who always makes news, Rosca asks
some decidedly personal questions: ones that deal with the way he chooses
to have fun, how he kicked his smoking habit, and whether he would be
rather writing more poetry than prose or the other way around. And Sison
gamely obliges.
At
the same time there is an extensive discourse on Sison’s way of looking
at the world – its past, present, and future. The interviews showing
Sison’s views on the national-democratic revolution in the Philippines
and the world proletarian revolution are meant to unearth the
comprehensive ideology behind Sison’s advocacy of people’s war, backed
up by other forms of struggle, as means of changing the way things are –
with the ultimate goal of contributing toward bringing about a life fit
for humans the world over.
On
the question of whether a just and lasting peace can be achieved through
the GRP-NDFP peace talks and whether these can replace the revolutionary
armed struggle, Sison has this to say: “There are peace negotiations
because there is an armed struggle between the revolutionary forces of the
people and the counterrevolutionary forces of the ruling classes. The
contending sides have agreed to negotiate in order to address the roots of
the armed conflict, make reforms beneficial to the people and thus pave
the way for a just and lasting peace.
“The
Filipino people and the NDFP know what they want to achieve from the peace
negotiations. They have no illusions that genuine peace cannot be achieved
through negotiations alone. It is clear that the line of struggle for a
just and lasting peace is the same as the line of struggle for national
liberation and democracy.
“The
revolutionary armed struggle is the sure process of empowering the people
and satisfying their demands. The peace negotiations conducted by the most
competent negotiators cannot go beyond what the people’s armed
revolution can achieve and therefore cannot replace it.”
At
home in the world
The
book’s title, Jose Maria Sison: At
Home in the World – Portrait of a Revolutionary, is apt. This is the chronicle of a man who was banished from the
country of his birth and branded a “terrorist” because he refused to
accept its condition as a land enslaved; but who never lifted his feet
from his native land even as he is bound to the refugee’s life abroad,
and refuses to be cowed by those who seek to terrorize him by calling him
a “terrorist.”
In
the March 30, 1994 poem “Sometimes, the Heart Yearns for Mangoes,” one
of the several Sison poems that bridge the gaps between chapters, the
interviewee says: “The well-purposed exile continues/To fight for his
motherland/Against those who banished him,/The unwelcome exploiters of his
people,/And he is certain that he is at home/In his own country and the
world.”
The
poem captures the essence of Jose Maria Sison’s life, and is fit to be
what the book makes it: one of the closing pieces to a chronicle of the
life, thoughts and works of a prominent, definitely well-purposed exile. Bulatlat
Back
to top
We
want to know what you think of this article.
|