APEC Chile
Summit: First World Recovery from Cancun Setbacks?
As developments seem to
show, the First World bloc had as its agenda in the pre-summit APEC
Ministerial Meeting in Santiago, Chile the drive to get what it failed to
achieve in last year’s stalled WTO talks in Cancun, Mexico. The Santiago
delegates agreed to strengthen support for the WTO, among other things.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN
REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
Anti-globalization activists protest
against APEC Summit in Santiago, Chile |
The ongoing
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit
in Santiago, Chile,
has for its main agenda the attempt by the First World
bloc to push its goals at last year’s World Trade Organization (WTO)
Ministerial Meeting in Cancun, Mexico.
Listed in the agenda
of the Cancun talks were: a multilateral investment agreement, competition
policy, government procurement, and trade facilitation. The multilateral
investment agreement, competition policy, and trade facilitation issues
were to push for further opening of the Third World economies to more
aggressive foreign investment, while the competition policy and trade
facilitation issues sought to achieve uniformity in competition and trade
policies among WTO member countries.
|
The Cancun talks
collapsed because of protests from leaders of Third World
countries, who asserted that the conditions pushed by the
First World
were highly detrimental to their countries’ economies. Thousands of
anti-globalization activists and figures from all over the world and from
all ideological shades also converged at
Cancun
to stop the talks or push for WTO reforms.
Attending the
Santiago summit are heads of state and their trade ministers from 21
countries: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, the People's
Republic of China, Hong Kong,
Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New
Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Chinese
Taipei, Thailand, the U.S., and Vietnam.
Weeks before the APEC
summit, anti-globalization activists battled with police. The summit was
also held in the midst of another event – the Chilean people’s clamor for
the prosecution of former strongman, Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who is being
made to account for numerous atrocities committed in the 1970s-1980s.
Trade
liberalization
In an interview with
Bulatlat, Athena Peralta, World Council of Churches (WCC)
consultant on women and economy, said that since
the collapse of the WTO talks in Cancun last year
(which, according to some analysts, signalled the impending “death” of
multilateralism in the global trading regime),
the U.S. and, to a lesser degree, the European Union and Japan has
redoubled efforts to reach bilateral as well as regional trade deals with
favoured countries. “These deals are of course primarily aimed at ensuring
and expanding U.S. access to potential markets for American products,” she
said.
According to Peralta,
who graduated from the University of the Philippines (UP) School
of Economics and pursued graduate
studies at the Institute of Social
Studies in The Hague,
Netherlands, agreements reached at
the APEC meeting would be significant, with the trade bloc accounting for
47 percent of world trade and the Asia Pacific being the fastest-growing
region in the world.
But APEC
is also a diverse bloc of high-, middle- and low-income countries, making
for more tricky negotiations, Peralta said. In this context, she said, the
U.S., which possesses tremendous bargaining power as the world’s biggest
economy, is likely to push for accelerated trade negotiations and
concessions especially in the area of services.
True
enough, in the APEC Ministerial Meeting held Nov. 18 and 19 as part of the
summit in Santiago, the delegates
reaffirmed their commitment “to the improvement of and liberalization
within the multilateral trading system. In their
joint statement issued at the conclusion of the pre-leaders’ summit
Ministerial Meeting Nov. 19, the delegates stressed “the importance
of agricultural reform, including the abolition of all forms of
agricultural export subsidies and unjustifiable export prohibitions and
restrictions at an early date, substantial reduction of trade-distorting
domestic support, as well as substantial improvements in market access.”
They also called for the further elimination of tariff and non-tariff
barriers for non-agricultural goods. All APEC members pledged to submit
“improved revised offers” by May 2005. They also reaffirmed the improving
WTO rules.
Corruption
The stamping-out of corruption was also on the agenda of the APEC meeting
in Santiago.
Corruption is one of the “most serious threats to good governance and the
proper development of economic systems in the APEC region, and globally,”
the joint statement reads. The ministers agreed to combat corruption in
order to strengthen “the core foundations of our collective values in
society, in particular in the areas of economic development, growth, and
prosperity.”
Anti-corruption is supposed to have been the thrust of the policy on
transparency in government procurement pushed by the
First World
countries in
Cancun
last year. At the APEC conference in Santiago, the delegates among other
things agreed to take steps toward ratification of or accession to, and
implementation of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC);
the strengthening of effective measures to prevent and fight corruption
and ensure transparency, the denial of “safe haven” to officials and
individuals guilty of public corruption, those who corrupt them, and their
assets; combating both public and private sector corruption; promoting
public-private partnerships, and the nurturing of cooperation to combat
corruption in the Asia-Pacific region.
The anti-corruption thrust of the Santiago conference has been seen as an
attempt to score some propaganda points for the First World bloc. The bloc
led by the
United States,
Japan and EU countries, has been under increasing criticism in recent
years from leaders of poor countries affected by pro-globalization
measures it has been imposing through trade agreements.
But the drive against corruption, Peralta said, does not stem from any
altruistic motivation.
“Stamping
out corruption is seen to lower business transaction costs for investors
and, therefore, measures to improve governance and transparency are seen
as a boost for investments,” she said.
“While a valid concern, poor governance and corruption in Southern
countries have been increasingly used in the mainstream development
discourse as scapegoats for the failure of neoliberal economic policies,
including trade liberalization policies,” she also noted. “It is often
conveniently forgotten that ‘it takes two to tango’ and it is not unknown
for foreign and multinational investors to offer kickbacks to local
officials and partners in exchange for facilitating their business
projects.”
Infectious diseases
Meanwhile, the taking of steps toward the eradication of infectious
diseases was also on the Santiago agenda. The joint statement itself
explains the underlying reason for such concern: “Ministers
recognized that outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as SARS in 2003 and
avian influenza in 2004, have a profound impact on both the peoples and
the economies of the region. They encouraged continued vigilance and
preparedness so as to detect, respond to, and mitigate the impact on the
economy of public health threats.”
As Peralta noted, “The
airline, tourism and retail industries experienced rough times, slightly
dampening overall growth rates for some Asian countries.”
She also said that the APEC’s avowed concern for the spread of infectious
diseases would have to be matched by concrete steps.
“To date, for instance, too little funds have actually been generated for
the Global Fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria (even as the U.S.
and other countries expend billions of dollars on wars and invasions),”
she noted.
“Moreover, any genuine attempt to fight HIV/AIDS and illnesses has to
seriously reconsider the WTO agreement on TRIPS in relation to public
health and medicines. The current interpretation of this agreement still
leaves much to be desired in terms of allowing poor countries access to
generic drugs at affordable rates,” she said. Bulatlat
BACK TO TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■ Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified. |