Labor
Chief’s Power Illegal - Constitutionalist and Ex-Labor Official
A
constitutionalist and former labor undersecretary says that legal
provisions allowing the labor department to assume jurisdiction over labor
disputes is now “dead,” making the assumption of jurisdiction now
illegal. The DoLE’s assumption of jurisdiction over the collective
bargaining deadlock at the Hacienda Luisita last Nov. 10 is blamed, among
other factors, for the violent dispersal of striking workers at the sugar
plantation six days later.
BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
The
legal provisions allowing the labor secretary to assume jurisdiction over
labor disputes are now a dead law, making the said recourse illegal.
This is the contention of labor
advocate Amado Gat. Inciong, a member of the Philippine Constitution
Association (Philconsa) and former labor undersecretary. He expressed this
argument Nov. 25 in a House of Representatives hearing on the Nov. 16
dispersal of protesting plantation and mill workers of Hacienda Luisita, a
6,000-hectare sugar plantation owned by the Cojuangco family in Tarlac
province, 100 kms north of Manila.
The
Nov. 25 hearing was conducted in aid of legislation. In the hearing, Rep.
Edcel Lagman (Albay, Aksyon Demokratiko) proposed a remedial legislative
measure that would limit the powers of the labor secretary to assume
jurisdiction over labor conflicts.
A
day before, there had also been an investigation by the Senate into the
Hacienda Luisita dispersal. Labor Secretary Patricia Sto. Tomas, who was
present at the Senate investigation, said: “Article
263 (g) of the Labor Code of the Philippines provides that the Secretary
of Labor and Employment may assume jurisdiction over a labor dispute that
is in the national interest and may call on law enforcement agencies to
assure compliance with lawful orders.”
But
Inciong said the legal provision for the assumption of jurisdiction “is
a dead law and should now be buried.” He said that the reason the
Department of Labor and Employment (DoLE) is still able to use it is
because it has not been stricken off the statute books.
“The
assumption of jurisdiction is tantamount to compulsory bargaining,” said
Inciong. “This is incompatible with the 1987 Constitution which upholds
the principle of collective bargaining.”
Under
contest
In
a press conference on Nov. 18, Noel Neri, one of the Luisita workers’
lawyers, described Sto. Tomas’ assumption of jurisdiction over the labor
dispute as illegal. He said the Nov. 10 AJ order was under contest at the
National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and therefore the labor
secretary was under legal constraint not to execute it.
At
the Senate hearing on Nov. 24, PNP Region III Director Quirino dela Torre
seemed to contradict assertions by Sto. Tomas who said she had to deputize
Army soldiers following Region III police intelligence report of the
presence of “New People’s Army” guerrillas at the Luisita picket
line. Dela Torre, who was relieved from his post, clarified that the
strikers were backed by militant groups only – and not the NPA.
In
the Senate hearing conducted by the chamber’s labor committee, Sen.
Aquilino Pimentel, Jr. asked for Sto. Tomas’ resignation.
Inciong
meanwhile traced the origin of the assumption of jurisdiction process to a
decree promulgated by the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos at the height of
martial rule.
Inciong cited
Article XIII, Sec. 3 of the Constitution, which provides that: “(The
State) shall guarantee the rights of all workers to self-organization,
collective bargaining and negotiations, and peaceful concerted activities,
including the right to strike in accordance with law. They shall be
entitled to security of tenure, humane conditions of work, and a living
wage. They shall also participate in policy and decision-making processes
affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law.”
“Secretary
Sto. Tomas is in a pitiful position where she has to implement a legal
provision that is now dead,” Inciong said. “Very pitiful.”
Dispersal
In
the House hearing, Lagman pressed Sto. Tomas on whether or not there was a
request from the Cojuangcos for an assumption of jurisdiction. He
disclosed that based on his experience as a labor lawyer, assumption of
jurisdiction orders are usually issued “at the instance of
management.”
Sto.
Tomas could not answer straight Lagman’s query.
The
assumption of jurisdiction order issued by Sto. Tomas instructed the
Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
to “remove all barriers” to ingress and egress at the Hacienda Luisita.
On
Nov. 16, a volley of shots, lasting between two and three minutes, was
heard in the vicinity of Hacienda Luisita.
Seven
strikers were confirmed dead, although 14 were reported killed in the
gunfire. The remaining seven are still unaccounted for. More than 200
others were wounded.
Police
and military officials have floated the line that the first shot came from
the ranks of the strikers, and the crowd dispersal personnel merely fired
shots to defend themselves.
Police
Senior Supt. Angel Sunglao, who headed the Task Force Luisita, and PNP
Region III director Enrique Galang testified at the House hearing.
Congressmen queried them as to whether the police forces were attacked
with gunfire, but they could not categorically say that they were.
Sunglao
and Galang even presented a video footage at the hearing, after a video
presentation by the human rights group Ecumenical Movement for Justice and
Peace (EMJP), represented in the hearing by its secretary-general Girlie
Padilla. Neither of the video footages showed strikers firing the first
shot.
Condemnation
Meanwhile,
the congressmen present at the hearing were one in condemning the
“violent” dispersal of Nov. 16.
Rep.
Erin Tañada (Quezon, Liberal Party) said that there was “no
justification” for the “violence and loss of lives” that occurred
last Nov. 16. Rep. Rufino Biazon (Muntinlupa City, Liberal Party) echoed
Tañada’s reaction.
“More
than the seven (strikers) were killed but what has been slain here are
constitutional provisions on land reform and the right to strike,” said
Lagman.
Meanwhile,
Anakpawis (Toiling Masses) Rep. Crispin Beltran announced that he and
colleague Rafael Mariano, also from Anakpawis, will file a protest at the
Commission on Appointments to block the confirmation of Sto. Tomas’
appointment as labor secretary. With other reports / Bulatlat
BACK TO TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■ Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified. |