This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. V, No. 13, May 8-14, 2005
ANALYSIS
A Battered Presidency
The deteriorating economic
conditions, the political rifts in the ruling elite, the growing clamor for the
President to resign and the surge of the revolutionary movement in the
countryside will haunt Macapagal-Arroyo no end in the months ahead. Her options
are getting narrower.
By Bobby Tuazon Badly bruised by charges of
corruption, illegal gambling and unabated violence, the Macapagal-Arroyo
administration is by all indications headed for a disaster. Its plummeting
popularity rating based on surveys and a keen reading of the public pulse only
shows a deeper wound – a political support that’s getting narrower by the day.
Save for the military – which the President herself cannot rein in – the fragile
coalition of parties in Congress and U.S. President George Bush, Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo cannot count on a solid political base she could mobilize to
take her social and economic agenda forward. Remove the trappings of the
presidential leadership – the official statements, publicized visits in the
provinces and overseas travels – and you are left with a president who is unable
to govern anymore. When Macapagal-Arroyo was
thrust into the presidency following the unseating of Joseph Estrada in January
2001 and with a pledge to the broad oust-Estrada movement to reform the
government, she took on the reins of power that was already weakened by
corruption, crime syndicates inside and outside government, fiscal deficit and
other serious economic woes. The organized Left – the major force that played a
central role in Estrada’s ouster – had pledged its support for her but only on
principled grounds – that she start thoroughgoing reforms and heed the demands
for genuine land reform, to uphold national sovereignty, to address the issue of
human rights violations squarely and to increase labor wages, among others. All through the more than
three years of her presidency, Macapagal-Arroyo – herself a member of the
traditional ruling elite – pursued policies that were anything but pro-people,
deepened the country’s ties with the United States along the master-and-slave
tradition, and began to deal with progressive and revolutionary forces with a
mailed fist. Extended
crisis As a result, the
President’s pro-elite and pro-globalization policies have only aggravated rural
poverty and urban unemployment and triggered an unprecedented financial crisis.
The crisis has extended to other realms: in education, where the dropout rate at
all levels has risen while new graduates cannot find jobs; as well as in the
health, housing and other sectors. Agricultural production has been badly hit
turning the country into a food importer and its food security continually
threatened. Public surveys reveal the dire times: the poverty threshold has
increased and so is the number of people going hungry everyday. About 12 percent
of the people – up from 10 percent a few years ago – say they will support calls
for a change in government. Six out of 10 want the President to be replaced now. It is also in the region of
political and foreign policy where disastrous consequences have resulted for
which Macapagal-Arroyo should be held accountable. Her blind support for Bush’s
war on terror that was, in the first place, based on fabricated lies deepened
the country’s economic and military dependence on the United States, restored
U.S. military presence and dragged the poor country into Pentagon’s global wars
of aggression. Her own war on terror in the Philippines has boosted the
military’s brinkmanship particularly in security affairs as well as in peace
negotiations with the Marxist and Moro revolutionary forces. At least 10
agreements already forged with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines
– agreements that would have given peace a chance – cannot be implemented
because the Macapagal-Arroyo government has chosen to dishonor these by
insisting on the Left to capitulate with another pressure to boot – the
liquidation of alleged and unarmed legal personalities of the NDFP. The war has also renewed
the campaign of political repression targeting in particular legitimate people’s
organizations and political dissenters in all walks of life – progressive
legislators, activists, journalists, church people, human rights volunteers,
lawyers, women, youth and others. Part of the armed crackdown is to restore
fascist rule by legislating a super anti-terrorism act that aims to curtail
civil liberties and force legitimate progressive organizations into the
underground. Most
corrupt, most dangerous It is under Macapagal-Arroyo
that the Philippines has remained in the top list of the most corrupt countries
in the world and as the most dangerous country ever for activists, journalists,
lawyers, rights watchdogs, the clergy and legislators. Rotten to the core, the
regime’s oppressive policies and inept leadership have made Macapagal-Arroyo the
Filipino people’s major thorn – although the more perceptive observer can also
say she is a temporary aberration in a political and economic system that has
long been in a terminal crisis. Be that as it may, signs
are building up revealing widespread skepticism about Macapagal-Arroyo’s ability
to stay in power, serious rifts in the ruling elite and public disillusionment
not only in the President but also in the present government as an institution.
There have been major cabinet resignations in recent months, the most recent of
which is that of Haydee Yorac of the Presidential Commission on Good Government
(PCGG). Yorac’s resignation and the recent jueteng scandal boosted allegations
of corruption in government and links to crime syndicates involving presidential
relatives, some cabinet officials as well as political, military and police
allies of Macapagal-Arroyo. Church leaders, among them at last eight Catholic
archbishops and bishops, have also aired their disgust over similar reports
including the culture of impunity that has resulted in the string of killings
taking place all over the country. As expected, the confluence
of these events and the upsurge of mass protests spearheaded by the recent
nationwide transport strike and the May 1 indignation rallies were seized by
anti-Arroyo groups from the political elite to call for the ouster of the
President and the establishment of a military junta. But the call by the
Coalition for National Salvation backfired even before it could take off partly
due to some of its leaders’ bias against Leftist politics. Former Defense
Secretary Fortunato Abat, said to be close to former President Fidel V. Ramos,
thumbed down proposals to join the Labor Day rally in Manila. The big May 1
rally at Liwasang Bonifacio, led by the Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU or May 1st
Movement) and other militant multisectoral organizations, called for the ouster
of Macapagal-Arroyo raising prospects that this could lead to yet another people
power. It would be sheer
speculation now to entertain ideas that the country will likely see another
president thrown out of power – possibly within the next two years. But each
period of acute crisis that Filipinos have been confronted with has always led
to a president being ousted from office – the strongman Ferdinand Marcos in 1986
and Joseph Estrada in 2001. One thing is certain though: the deteriorating
economic conditions, the political rifts in the ruling elite, the growing clamor
for the President to resign and the surge of the revolutionary movement in the
countryside will haunt Macapagal-Arroyo no end in the months ahead. Her options
are getting narrower. Bulatlat © 2004 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Bulatlat