NEWS
ANALYSIS
GMA Apology Evades Big
Issues
President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo’s June 27 televised admission that it was her voice that
is in the controversial taped conversations widely believed to be dealing
with rigging the 2004 presidential election has, as the oft-repeated
phrase goes, raised more questions than answers. As such, it has
aggravated rather than solved the present presidential crisis.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN
REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo’s (GMA) June 27 televised admission that it was her voice
that is in the controversial taped conversations widely believed to be
dealing with rigging the 2004 presidential election has, as the
oft-repeated phrase goes, raised more questions than answers. As such, it
has aggravated rather than solved the present presidential crisis.
Press Secretary
Ignacio Bunye had released June 6 two CDs containing audio files of what
he said was a taped conversation between the President and a political
leader of the administration Lakas-CMD in Mindanao, southern Philippines.
One of them, Bunye said, was a version purportedly altered by the
opposition to make it appear that Macapagal-Arroyo had cheated in the 2004
presidential election.
Both “original” and
“tampered” have portions in which a woman – said to be Macapagal-Arroyo –
was asking a man (“Gary” in the “original” version, “Garci” in what Bunye
called the tampered version) if she would still win by a million votes.
The “Garci” in what Bunye said was the tampered version of the tape is
widely believed to be Commission on Elections (Comelec) Commissioner
Virgilio Garcillano.
Macapagal-Arroyo won
by a million votes over her closest rival, Fernando Poe, Jr.
Days later, lawyer
Alan Paguia, counsel for deposed President Joseph Estrada, came out with a
longer tape, and after a few days he would be followed by National Bureau
of Investigation (NBI) agent Samuel Ong who claimed to possess the “mother
of all tapes.”
For several weeks
Macapagal-Arroyo kept mum on the issue, leading even some of her allies
like Vice President Noli de Castro to urge her to break her silence.
Public pressure mounted and mounted to the point where she had to make her
June 27 television appearance, admit that the female voice on record was
hers, and asked the Filipino people to forgive her.
Days after the
admission, pressure on her is not easing: if any, it has continued to
mount as shown by the steady swelling of rallies calling for her ouster.
Opposition Sen.
Panfilo Lacson, who was one of Macapagal-Arroyo’s opponents in the 2004
election, described the apology as intending to confuse the people. Bayan
Muna (People First) Rep. Teddy Casiño would chide Macapagal-Arroyo in a
June 28 forum at the University of the Philippines (UP) in Manila for
making an apology without saying what it was she was apologizing for.
Even as they come
from different ends, Lacson and Casiño both hit it on the head. There are
just too many questions that the admission and apology leave unanswered,
which explains the increasingly difficult situation Macapagal-Arroyo finds
herself in even after her June 27 appearance.
A million votes
“I
was anxious to protect my votes and during that time had conversations
with many people, including a Comelec official,” Macapagal-Arroyo said.
“My intent was not to influence the outcome of the election, and it did
not.”
With
this line of argument, Macapagal-Arroyo fails to explain whether all the
resources at her disposal as an incumbent President running for a fresh
term were not enough for her to build and maintain a strong electoral
machinery that could protect her votes without her having to call an
election official several times, whether or not it was Garcillano – an act
that violates of election laws according to several legal experts.
Macapagal-Arroyo also conveniently evaded the most crucial issue
concerning the tape, the one that reinforces public suspicion that there
was massive fraud in the 2004 election and she was among its
beneficiaries. In both “original” and “tampered” versions of the tape,
there is a part where Macapagal-Arroyo is heard asking a man whether she
will still win by a million votes.
The
President has a lot of explaining to do on why she knew she was going to
win by a million votes. Without a credible explanation, Macapagal-Arroyo
will not be able to stop the public from suspecting that she knew she was
going to win by a million votes because there was a script that said so.
Not even the most accurate surveys have been able to predict election
outcomes as accurately.
And
what did she mean when she said – even in the “original” tape – that her
lead “cannot be less than 1 million”? With this sticking out, it is very
difficult for her to prove that she did not intend to influence the
outcome of the election.
“And as
you remember,” she hastened to tell the viewers, “the outcome had been
predicted by every major public opinion poll, and adjudged free, fair and
decisive by international election observers, and our own Namfrel
(National Movement for Free Elections).”
She is
not helped by the fact that the 2004 presidential election, which
international observers sent by the
U.S.
government and indeed even the Namfrel adjudged as free, fair and decisive
continues to be haunted by the specter of election documents containing
glaring discrepancies in the figures – many of these with signs of
tampering.
The
credibility of the entire electoral exercise of 2004 is at the crux of the
matter surrounding the taped conversations.
The
question of Macapagal-Arroyo’s legitimacy had never been resolved, and the
fact that her proclamation was “done in the dead of night,” as a June 24
statement by the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan or New Patriotic
Alliance) put it, only made things worse for her.
End
of the line
Instead
of appeasing the people, Macapagal-Arroyo’s apology only led to an
increase in the tempo of public outrage. Instead of salvaging whatever may
be said to remain of her much-vaunted “Strong
Republic,” Macapagal-Arroyo’s
apology has only brought her closer to the edge.
The
danger signs are already there. Anti-GMA alliances are sprouting
everywhere, and it is no longer just the Left and the Fernando Poe, Jr.
forces that are hitting her.
Support
for her from the country’s particularly influential sectors like the
Church, academe, and the business community – once seemingly solid – is
fast eroding, and as of last July 1, Manila Archbishop Gaudencio Rosales
has been reported to have issued a statement calling on the President to
face her accountability. Her political allies appear to be flying away:
Parañaque Rep. Roilo Golez has resigned from the ruling coalition and
called for her resignation, while Agriculture Secretary Arthur Yap has
quit his post.
In
attempting to pull herself away from the end of the line, Macapagal-Arroyo
has only pushed herself closer to it. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.