This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. V, No. 28, August 21-27, 2005
It’s ‘Bad Food, Bad Life’ for Nestlé’s Workers
“The
next time you enter the grocery store to buy a milk or chocolate drink, please
remember the plight of the Nestle workers.” This is the appeal of Nestle workers
whose case against the giant Swiss-owned food multinational company drags
unresolved.
by
Dennis Espada
Labor law violations
According to Kalipunan ng mga Magsasaka sa
Kabite (Kamagsasaka-Ka or Farmers Association in
Cavite), in
1979, Nestlé initiated the massive planting of the robusta crop over the
traditional arabica (also called kapeng Tagalog) and liberica (kapeng
barako) which consequently dominated the coffee fields. Robusta is used in
manufacturing soluble coffee. © 2004 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Bulatlat
Cabuyao, Laguna – "Good Food, Good Life"
is Nestle’s promotional line, designed to entice consumers to taste its
products. For its workers, however, who have been on strike since 2001, neither
life nor food could be remotely considered good.
At least 100 workers led by the
Union of Filipro Employees (UFE), the Nestle workers’ union, stormed the Cabuyao
factory gates last Aug. 10 unmindful of the container vans and barbed wires and
staged a protest rally calling for the immediate resolution of the labor
dispute.
The
strikers were not asking for money. They demanded that the Nestlé management
comply with the 1991
Supreme Court (SC) decision which declared the retirement benefit plan as a
mandatory collective
bargaining issue.
In January 2002, the 600-member
UFE launched a strike in adherence to the SC's ruling when the management
vehemently refused to negotiate until the retirement package is excluded,
claiming it a unilateral company grant. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the
SC ruling on
Feb. 27, 2003.
The case was raised to, and is
currently at, the SC upon the appeal of both parties, with the union seeking the
high tribunal to affirm its earlier promulgation and declare Nestlé guilty of
unfair labor practice.
Militant labor groups and their
allies said Nestlé was responsible for the four incidents of violent strike
dispersals and three incidents of destruction of picket lines, use of hired
armed goons and police personnel against strikers.
According to the union, the
prolonged impasse has led to the death of 11 strikers due to lack of medical
attention, not to mention the continuing physical harassment and death threats
being endured by the union. Their children were also forced to stop schooling
because they could not pay the required school fees.
UFE said that Nestlé, through
its former president and chief executive officer Juan B. Santos, who briefly
served as President Macapagal-Arroyo’s trade secretary, has been expanding the
operations of contracted toll packing and co-packing firms to keep costs down,
and hiring contract workers who lack both knowledge and skills to produce
quality food.
Coffee monopoly
Touted as
Asia's milk
supplier, Nestlé also remains the single largest purchaser of coffee in the
world. It controls 90-95
percent of the country's domestic market (40,000 tons every year) and, reports
also said, dictates prices to the small farmers.
"Pinupuno ng Nestlé ang mga
bodega nito ng sobrang suplay para sa isang taon...pinipili nito ang
pinakamahuhusay na
kalidad ng kape at siyang ineeksport, at ang naiiwan dito ay iyong mababa ang
kalidad na siyang ginagamit sa lokal na mga produkto nito"
(Nestlé fills its warehouses more than the needed supply for one year, then
chooses the coffee beans of high quality which it exports. The ones left are
those of low-quality which they use for local products), Kamagsasaka-Ka found
out in its research.
Appeal
As part of Nestlé’s
advertising offensive, its promodizers
in groceries and market stalls approach
customers to check if they have purchased Nestlé goods and they get a prize.
Noel Alemania, UFE
vice-president said in an interview with Bulatlat that because of
this promo, principals
and teachers from public elementary
schools, particularly in Cabuyao, are now
requiring students to bring empty wrappers or labels in exchange for Nestlé
products. Through the schools, he said Nestlé also gives children free school
supplies and milk that are nearing expiration. “All these to win over the hearts
and minds of the people,” he said.
But Alemania warned that
tolerating Nestlé’s gimmicks is “tolerating Nestlé’s exploitation of its workers
and its gross violations of the law."
Meanwhile, in its July 24
issue, the tabloid Bagong Tiktik (New Spy) narrated the story of a
consumer named Shirley Abad who reportedly won a cash prize worth half a million
pesos from Nestlé's raffle promo two years ago. The reward was however denied to
her due to "questions on technicalities." Abad sued the company and the case was
even raised to the CA, it was learned.
UFE also appealed to the
public: "The next time you visit the convenient store and grab a choco drink,
please remember us and our plight." Bulatlat