SPECIAL REPORT
After Luisita, Now
It’s Sugarlandia
Negros farmers groups demand similar SDO
cancellation
First of
two parts
After Tarlac City,
Negros sugarlandia is bracing for peasant rumblings as demand has been
raised for the cancellation of the stock distribution scheme (SDO) in
several plantations. Negros has the most number of SDOs which, farmers
groups say, have made them forever landless.
By Karl G. Ombion and Ranie Azue
Bulatlat
BACOLOD CITY – The
recent decision of the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) revoking the
14-year-old stock distribution option (SDO) of Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac
City in Central Luzon has opened the floodgates to renewed demands by
farmers for the cancellation of SDOs in several sugar plantations in
Negros Island, central Philippines.
MISERABLE STILL:
Farmworkers like
them remain poor after decades of SDO schemes in large sugar
plantations.
CIRMS PHOTO |
|
Of the 13 SDOs that
virtually exempted big sugar landholdings throughout the country from the
1987 Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), nine are in Negros
Occidental. Of these, nine are in Negros Occidental. The other SDOs are,
aside from Tarlac, in Iloilo in central Philippines, and Davao in the
south.
True enough,
following the recent cancellation of the SDO scheme of Hacienda Luisita
Inc. (HLI) owned by the powerful Cojuangco-Aquino family in Tarlac by DAR,
the DAR-Negros is undertaking a summary review of all SDOs and related
land arrangements, especially in Negros.
Manuel Velasco,
Provincial Agrarian Reform Officer 1 (PARO) of Negros Occidental, admitted
that his office has been swarmed by queries and complaints from agrarian
reform beneficiaries with many of them saying they also have their right
to get the lands they have been tilling for years.
“I am not surprised
by these reactions,” Velasco told Bulatlat. “I can understand the
desire of the farmers to own the lands they till. But they have to go
through the process. So we’re reviewing all SDOs.”
Corporations
Five of the nine SDOs
covering 542 hectares with 472 beneficiaries all planted with sugarcane
are owned by Arsenio Acuna Agricultural Corporation, Elenita Agricultural
Development Corp., Hacienda Elenita, Barangay (village) Burgos, Cadiz
City; Archie Fishpond Inc., Hacienda Pag-asa, Barangay Luna, Cadiz City;
Tabigue Marine Ventures Inc., Hacienda Tabigue, Barangay Tabigue, EB
Magalona, Negros Occidental.; Ma. Clara Marine Ventures Inc., Brgy
Calumangan, Bago City; and Palma-Kabankalan Agri Corp, Hacienda Palma,
Ilog town, Negros Occidental.
The others are
Ledesma Hermanos Agricultural Corp., Hacienda Fortuna, Brgy Buluangan, San
Carlos, Negros Occidental, owned by former Rep. Julio A. Ledesma, with
1,024 has., 747 beneficiaries; Wutrich Hermanos Inc., Hacienda Sto. Tomas,
Barangay Buenavista, Calatrava, Negros Occidental, owned by Otto Weber Jr.,
174 hectares, 177 beneficiaries; SVJ Farms Inc., Hacienda Anita, Barangay
Concepcion, Talisay City, Negros Occidental, owned by Ma. Regina M
Villanueva, 170 hectares, 144 beneficiaries; and the NAJALIN Agri Ventures
Inc., Hacienda Najalin, Brgy Nagasi, La Carlota, Negros Occidental, owned
by Rudolph E. Jularbal and Joaquin G. Teves, with 438 hectares, 273
beneficiaries.
Aside from the 13,
Velas said another SDO is in Negros Oriental owned reportedly by the Teves
family. He gave no further details.
|
Hunger is the lot of this Negros farm worker in his
decrepit dwelling place, despite the promises of the SDO scheme. CIRMS
PHOTO |
The nine SDO farms in
Negros Occidental have a total area of 2,348 hectares, with 1,813 agrarian
reform beneficiaries. Six of these have been in existence since 1991, the
other three since 1992.
Referendum
Asked by Bulatlat
why Negros has the most number of SDOs, Velasco said the nine in Negros
Occidental were the fastest in complying with the requirements set by the
DAR. He said agrarian reform beneficiaries voted for the SDO in a
referendum and then signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the landowner.
(In Tarlac, farm workers unions said they were pressured and cajoled by
the Cojuangco-Aquino family to vote for the referendum.)
However, peasant
groups led by the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP – Peasant Movement
in the Philippines) have denounced the SDO, which was attached to the CARP
by President Corazon Aquino in 1990, as an instrument allowing landlords
to keep huge landholdings while tenant farmers remain landless.
Indeed, as Velasco
said, under the SDO qualified agrarian reform beneficiaries do not get the
land but are given only stock certificates, with corresponding monetary
value and yearly dividends from the company’s net earnings.
He also confirmed
complaints of farm workers in some SDO-covered farms saying that while
they are supposed to be part-owner of the corporation, they do not
actually own the farms, and are not part of any corporate decision-making.
These reinforced,
Velasco added, the growing opposition of the farm workers toward the SDO.
Agrarian reform
beneficiaries interviewed by Bulatlat confirmed the miserable
situation of the farm workers under SDO, as experienced by their
counterparts in Tarlac.
At the SVJ Farms, for
instance, agrarian reform beneficiaries who asked not to be named said
that they receive low wages but not clear dividends. Their supposed profit
sharing is never honored by the landowner either. Contrary to the MoA,
they receive no rice subsidy or housing support, among others, they also
said.
Over at Hacienda
Palma, farm workers complained of similar problems. At most, they said,
they only receive PhP 500 for every person per year as dividend.
JVA, another name for SDO scheme
Aware of the visible
failures of the SDO scheme, Velasco batted for a better option for
agrarian reform beneficiaries - the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) scheme –
used by former Ambassador Eduardo “Danding” Cojangco, Jr. for his ECJ
Farms, Inc.
As a modified
version, Velasco said, JVA is more beneficial to the farm workers compared
to other existing SDOs. Under it, although the lands are retained by the
landowner (ECJ) the farm workers under the cooperative earn a bigger share
in profit compared to those in farms covered by SDO, he said.
However, ECJ Farms
beneficiaries earlier interviewed by Bulatlat insisted that
Cojuangco has only used the corporative scheme to make it appear that
agrarian reform has been implemented. Fact is, they said, ECJ remains very
much in feudal hands and its cooperative, the ECJ Farms Agrarian Reform
Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose Cooperative, as a farce controlled by
Cojuangco’s own people.
Lawyer Ben Ramos,
executive director of Paghidaet sa Kauswagan Development Group Inc. (PDG),
said that the public are misled to believe through media hype that ECJ
landholdings have been distributed, that the farmworkers are now freed
from feudal bondage, and are now enjoying a better life.
Requests for SDO cancellation
Meantime, farm
workers of Hacienda Palma, Najalin Agri Ventures Inc., Ma. Clara Marine
Ventures Inc., and SVJ Farms have reportedly asked DAR-Negros to
fast-track the cancellation of their SDOs and move instead for land
distribution.
Velasco explained
however that DAR cannot directly intervene in the implementation of SDO
and hence, its cancellation, without any written request from the
beneficiaries.
Violent confrontations feared in
Negros
Ealier, Richard
Sarrosa, chairman of KMP-Negros told Bulatlat that what happened to
HLI in Tarlac may also happen to the farmers and farmworkers in Hacienda
Balatong and other SDO farms in Negros because “the elements of land
control, deceptions, and the suppression of agrarian reform beneficiaries’
right to land, are deeply intertwined.”
Sarrosa said that
“the Cojuangcos in Negros may appear benign and philanthropic because of
their enormous donations and pledges to civic actions, schools, teachers,
and church programs, but they cannot hide their dirty hands as far as
records of repression in their land properties are concerned.”
Cojuangco’s security
guards, reportedly in cahoots with the military and members of the RPA-ABB
have been linked by farmers groups and rights watchdogs to the massacre of
children spider hunters as well as to land expansion schemes in Negros.
Bulatlat / With CIRMS News Service
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2005 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.