This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. V, No. 36, October 16-22, 2005
After Tarlac City, Negros
sugarlandia is bracing for peasant rumblings as demand has been raised for the
cancellation of the stock distribution scheme (SDO) in several plantations.
Negros has the most number of SDOs which, farmers groups say, have made them
forever landless.
By
Karl G. Ombion and Ranie Azue BACOLOD CITY – The recent
decision of the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) revoking the 14-year-old
stock distribution option (SDO) of Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac City in Central
Luzon has opened the floodgates to renewed demands by farmers for the
cancellation of SDOs in several sugar plantations in Negros Island, central
Philippines. Of the 13 SDOs that
virtually exempted big sugar landholdings throughout the country from the 1987
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), nine are in Negros Occidental. Of
these, nine are in Negros Occidental. The other SDOs are, aside from Tarlac, in
Iloilo in central Philippines, and Davao in the south. True enough, following the
recent cancellation of the SDO scheme of Hacienda Luisita Inc. (HLI) owned by
the powerful Cojuangco-Aquino family in Tarlac by DAR, the DAR-Negros is
undertaking a summary review of all SDOs and related land arrangements,
especially in Negros. Manuel Velasco, Provincial
Agrarian Reform Officer 1 (PARO) of Negros Occidental, admitted that his office
has been swarmed by queries and complaints from agrarian reform beneficiaries
with many of them saying they also have their right to get the lands they have
been tilling for years. “I am not surprised by
these reactions,” Velasco told Bulatlat. “I can understand the desire of
the farmers to own the lands they till. But they have to go through the process.
So we’re reviewing all SDOs.”
Corporations Five of the nine SDOs
covering 542 hectares with 472 beneficiaries all planted with sugarcane are
owned by Arsenio Acuna Agricultural Corporation, Elenita Agricultural
Development Corp., Hacienda Elenita, Barangay (village) Burgos, Cadiz City;
Archie Fishpond Inc., Hacienda Pag-asa, Barangay Luna, Cadiz City; Tabigue
Marine Ventures Inc., Hacienda Tabigue, Barangay Tabigue, EB Magalona, Negros
Occidental.; Ma. Clara Marine Ventures Inc., Brgy Calumangan, Bago City; and
Palma-Kabankalan Agri Corp, Hacienda Palma, Ilog town, Negros Occidental. The others are Ledesma
Hermanos Agricultural Corp., Hacienda Fortuna, Brgy Buluangan, San Carlos,
Negros Occidental, owned by former Rep. Julio A. Ledesma, with 1,024 has., 747
beneficiaries; Wutrich Hermanos Inc., Hacienda Sto. Tomas, Barangay Buenavista,
Calatrava, Negros Occidental, owned by Otto Weber Jr., 174 hectares, 177
beneficiaries; SVJ Farms Inc., Hacienda Anita, Barangay Concepcion, Talisay
City, Negros Occidental, owned by Ma. Regina M Villanueva, 170 hectares, 144
beneficiaries; and the NAJALIN Agri Ventures Inc., Hacienda Najalin, Brgy Nagasi,
La Carlota, Negros Occidental, owned by Rudolph E. Jularbal and Joaquin G. Teves,
with 438 hectares, 273 beneficiaries. Aside from the 13, Velas
said another SDO is in Negros Oriental owned reportedly by the Teves family. He
gave no further details. The nine SDO farms in
Negros Occidental have a total area of 2,348 hectares, with 1,813 agrarian
reform beneficiaries. Six of these have been in existence since 1991, the other
three since 1992. Asked by Bulatlat
why Negros has the most number of SDOs, Velasco said the nine in Negros
Occidental were the fastest in complying with the requirements set by the DAR.
He said agrarian reform beneficiaries voted for the SDO in a referendum and then
signed a Memorandum of Agreement with the landowner. (In Tarlac, farm workers
unions said they were pressured and cajoled by the Cojuangco-Aquino family to
vote for the referendum.) However, peasant groups led
by the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP – Peasant Movement in the
Philippines) have denounced the SDO, which was attached to the CARP by President
Corazon Aquino in 1990, as an instrument allowing landlords to keep huge
landholdings while tenant farmers remain landless. Indeed, as Velasco said,
under the SDO qualified agrarian reform beneficiaries do not get the land but
are given only stock certificates, with corresponding monetary value and yearly
dividends from the company’s net earnings. He also confirmed
complaints of farm workers in some SDO-covered farms saying that while they are
supposed to be part-owner of the corporation, they do not actually own the
farms, and are not part of any corporate decision-making. These reinforced, Velasco
added, the growing opposition of the farm workers toward the SDO. Agrarian reform
beneficiaries interviewed by Bulatlat confirmed the miserable situation
of the farm workers under SDO, as experienced by their counterparts in Tarlac.
At the SVJ Farms, for
instance, agrarian reform beneficiaries who asked not to be named said that they
receive low wages but not clear dividends. Their supposed profit sharing is
never honored by the landowner either. Contrary to the MoA, they receive no rice
subsidy or housing support, among others, they also said. Over at Hacienda Palma,
farm workers complained of similar problems. At most, they said, they only
receive PhP 500 for every person per year as dividend. Aware of the visible
failures of the SDO scheme, Velasco batted for a better option for agrarian
reform beneficiaries - the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) scheme – used by former
Ambassador Eduardo “Danding” Cojangco, Jr. for his ECJ Farms, Inc. As a modified version,
Velasco said, JVA is more beneficial to the farm workers compared to other
existing SDOs. Under it, although the lands are retained by the landowner (ECJ)
the farm workers under the cooperative earn a bigger share in profit compared to
those in farms covered by SDO, he said. However, ECJ Farms
beneficiaries earlier interviewed by Bulatlat insisted that Cojuangco has
only used the corporative scheme to make it appear that agrarian reform has been
implemented. Fact is, they said, ECJ remains very much in feudal hands and its
cooperative, the ECJ Farms Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries Multi-Purpose
Cooperative, as a farce controlled by Cojuangco’s own people. Lawyer Ben Ramos, executive
director of Paghidaet sa Kauswagan Development Group Inc. (PDG), said that the
public are misled to believe through media hype that ECJ landholdings have been
distributed, that the farmworkers are now freed from feudal bondage, and are now
enjoying a better life. Meantime, farm workers of
Hacienda Palma, Najalin Agri Ventures Inc., Ma. Clara Marine Ventures Inc., and
SVJ Farms have reportedly asked DAR-Negros to fast-track the cancellation of
their SDOs and move instead for land distribution. Velasco explained however
that DAR cannot directly intervene in the implementation of SDO and hence, its
cancellation, without any written request from the beneficiaries. Ealier, Richard Sarrosa,
chairman of KMP-Negros told Bulatlat that what happened to HLI in Tarlac
may also happen to the farmers and farmworkers in Hacienda Balatong and other
SDO farms in Negros because “the elements of land control, deceptions, and the
suppression of agrarian reform beneficiaries’ right to land, are deeply
intertwined.” Sarrosa said that “the
Cojuangcos in Negros may appear benign and philanthropic because of their
enormous donations and pledges to civic actions, schools, teachers, and church
programs, but they cannot hide their dirty hands as far as records of repression
in their land properties are concerned.” Cojuangco’s security
guards, reportedly in cahoots with the military and members of the RPA-ABB have
been linked by farmers groups and rights watchdogs to the massacre of children
spider hunters as well as to land expansion schemes in Negros. Bulatlat /
With CIRMS News Service
© 2005 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
SPECIAL REPORT
After Luisita, Now It’s
Sugarlandia
Negros farmers groups demand similar SDO cancellation
First of two parts
Bulatlat Referendum
JVA, another name for SDO scheme
Requests for SDO cancellation
Violent confrontations feared in Negros
Conclusion