Stories of Hunger,
Landlessness and Armed Struggle
Asia Pacific
farmers, advocates meet in Negros conference
Stories of hunger, oppression, government neglect, landlessness,
greediness of agro-chemical transnational corporations, to democratic
protest movements and armed struggle for genuine land reform and social
change in Asia-Pacific are narrated by farmers and advocates of agrarian
reform in the region during a recent conference in Negros Occidental.
By Ranie Azue
Bulatlat
TALISAY
CITY, Negros Occidental - Farmers and advocates of agrarian reform in
Asia-Pacific countries now attest to how they have been victimized by the
World Trade Organization’s (WTO’s) neo-liberal policies and programs of
re-concentrating vast agricultural lands in the hands of the big landlords
and TNCs, destroying local agricultural production and producers, and
making them mere dumping grounds of agro-industrial imports.
Stories of
hunger, oppression, government neglect, landlessness, WTO and World Bank
destructive policies, greediness of agro-chemical transnational
corporations, to democratic protest movements to armed struggle for
genuine land reform and social change in various parts of Asia-Pacific,
were narrated in a two-day research conference on agrarian reform
sponsored by the Asia-Pacific Research Network (APRN) and Pesticides
Action Network-Asia Pacific (PAN-AP) in this city, central Philippines.
Farmer-leaders, NGOs, land reform advocates and social researchers from
Philippines, India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Mongolia, Pakistan, Indonesia,
Thailand and Japan participated in the conference held Oct. 17-18.
Neo-liberal offensives
Neoliberal
policies in agriculture have wreaked havoc on ASPAC economies, and
displaced millions of farmers and agricultural workers, conference
speakers said.
Gilbert Sape
of the PAN-AP and member of Coalition of Agricultural Workers
International (CAWI) noted that “globalization” driven by WTO,
transnational corporations (TNCs), international financial institutions
and supported by national elites, have ruined the lives and devastated
food sovereignty, resources and the environment. As a result, millions
have lost their livelihoods, rights to food, shelter, land, water, seeds,
forests and other resources.
Millions are
now faced with increasing unemployment, the increasing use of child labor,
bonded form of labor and forced migration, Sape also said. These adverse
forces have reduced peasants and agricultural workers of Asia Pacific to a
form of redundant labor, making them more vulnerable to exploitation,
oppression and subordination.
Sape also
said giant corporations like Syngenta and Monsanto in collaboration with
local landed elites have monopolized and promoted productive resources and
means of production through corporate agriculture. This form of
agriculture is ecologically unfriendly, externally dependent and promotes
hazardous technologies including pesticides and chemicals that threaten or
pose danger to health, food safety and the environment.
Marlo Abaja
of the APRN, on the other hand, added that the global economic, political,
social, and cultural spheres are controlled by neo-colonist forces that
are well positioned and entrenched. Through its power and influence, the
State it is able to violently suppress people's movements and resistance,
and to criminalize and imprison movement leaders.
There is
also the increased use of force through militarization to break up strikes
and workers mobilization, Abaja said. Agricultural worker leaders are even
being killed, kidnapped or detained and tortured under the bogey of the
“war on terror.” It is used to dismantle all mechanisms that protect and
promote the universal rights of people, he added.
Sape raised
the alarm over the scheme of TNCs in the Philippines to use NGOs, people’s
organizations (POs) and local government units (LGUs) to promote social
acceptability for their corporate agriculture and disastrous technologies
among the farmers and farm workers.
In some
countries in the region, including the Philippines, he revealed,
agro-chemical TNCs are not only pouring in millions in advertisements to
promote themselves with a “benign image,” but also support for LGUs, NGOs
and POs in promoting their products in the guise of sustainable
agriculture, nature-friendly organic technologies, and food security.
Land reform
Participants
in the conference agreed that land reform programs in Asia Pacific have
grossly failed because they did not alter existing skewed class structure.
Dr. Azra
Talat Sayeed, founder of Roots for Equity, a development NGO in Pakistan,
said land reform programs in most Asia Pacific countries, including in her
country, are dismal failures because they have been designed and
implemented in response to international capitalist pressures to avert
revolutionary responses by peasantry, and to legitimize oppressive
regimes.
Land reform
laws in these countries have taken a market-led orientation, i.e.,
“letting the market forces dictate the value, production and management of
lands,” she said.
Citing
Pakistan’s
own experience, Dr. Azra after the British colonizers left the country
following independence in 1947, military rule took over. Most agricultural
lands were never given to peasants and farm workers but were usurped by
big landlords while others were sold to transnational corporations. Most
Pakistanis, she said, do not even know that a Land Reform Law exists.
Biplap Halim
of the Institute for Motivating Self-employment in Governments in
Calcutta, India, said that the land reform program in his country that
begun in the 1970s failed because it was very much a compromised program,
loophole-ridden. Ownership ceilings and prices of lands were
disadvantageous to poor farmers. The absence of farm support system,
coupled by pressures from big landlords and TNCs, have forced millions of
supposed recipients of land reform sell their lands to big landlords and
private corporations.
The
implementation of liberalization of India’s agriculture in the 1990s has
only worsened the inequitable land structure of the country, Halim said.
TNCs with government support have seized vast tracts of land and promoted
corporate farming, contract growing, oriented and massive production of
cash crops for exports, he said.
He also said
that the growing problem of poverty and hunger in India is linked to the
basic problem of landlessness. “A growing number of people are hungry
because they don’t have access to food producing resources, no access to
lands,” he said.
Agnes Vimala
of Society for Rural Education and Development India agreed with her
colleagues, stressing however that women are often the worst victims of
government’s land reform policies. She said, in India’s patriarchal
system, women are either not allowed to own the lands or are forced to
work in the farms like slaves the rest of their lives.
She said,
women work longer than men, receive low wages, and more vulnerable to
hazards of work. These conditions often forced women to leave farms and
migrate to urban centers only to end up as slaves in commercial stores and
prostitution dens.
She also
said that the failure of land reform program in the countryside has direct
correlations with the growing cases of crimes and social unrest not only
in the rural areas but in urban centers as well. In farms operated by TNCs
where big plantations of flowers for perfumes are produced, women’s groups
affiliated with Vimala’s group uncovered a number of women farm workers
that have developed deceases in their ovaries.
Siva of
Human Development Organization of Sri Lanka said that the neo-liberal
policies in agriculture in his country have not only rendered government’s
agrarian reform inutile, but also undermined the country’s food security
and the social security of most agricultural workers.
In
Indonesia
it’s even worse, said Erfan Faryadi, Secretary General of the Alliance of
Agrarian Reform Movement (AGRA). The mere talk or issues about genuine
land reform have been long considered a taboo in Indonesia. The lack of
programs for genuine land distribution has been the root for growing
unrest in the country, he said.
The land
reform problem in Indonesia is no different from countries in the Asia
Pacific. It is also market-led, giving more bias to big landlords and TNCs
now swarming Indonesia’s countryside.
In Mongolia,
revealed Delgermaa of the Center for Human Rights and Development, the
land reform program of their government has retaken all lands given to
farmers and farmworkers since the 1990s in favor of the implementation of
Land reform policy paper of IMF-WB setting prices for lands at higher
value, and giving priority to TNCs and big landlords and capitalists to
own lands for commercial ventures.
She said
this has threatened the food security of her country.
Carl Anthony
Ala, public information officer (PIO) of KMP, said that the growing
dissatisfaction of farmers and agricultural workers toward government land
reform programs, is a common trend in Asia Pacific. But this is a good
sign, for it means, peasants are looking for better alternatives, he
added.
Philippine experience no different
The
Philippines
is no different, said Danilo Ramos, KMP secretary general. “All the land
reforms in the country since 1960s to the present’s Comprehensive Agrarian
Reform Program (CARP), have all been failures because they were crafted by
big landlords, compradors and bureaucrats,” he said.
Ramos said
the main problem in the Philippines is still landlessness. Citing official
data, he said, out of every 100 farmers 21 are agricultural workers, 28
are unpaid family workers, 26 are under some form of tenancy relation and
only 25 own land. Seven out of 10 do not own the land they till. On the
other hand, only few families control vast tracks of lands; 60 percent of
the agricultural lands are owned by 13 percent of landowners. The biggest
landlords, only 9,500 people, own more than 20 percent of all agricultural
lands in the country.
The CARP,
said to be former President Corazon Aquino’s centerpiece program, turned
out to be a huge graveyard for Filipino peasants, Ramos said. It’s clearly
pro-landlords and pro-TNCs as evidenced by all sorts of exemptions and
conditions for evasion in the course of its implementation.
Jennifer
Malonzo of IBON Databank and Research Center explained that
market-oriented land reform program being implemented by the GMA
administration is a direct assault on farmers and agricultural workers
because it is nothing but “a land transaction between willing buyers and
sellers.”
These take
the forms of voluntary offer to sell, stock distribution option, joint
venture agreements, and numerous other land distribution evasion schemes,
she stressed.
Truth is,
she said, there is no actual expropriation of private lands for
distribution, only voluntary land transaction, using property as
collateral in the credit market.
Karl Ombion
of the Center for Investigative Research and Multimedia Services (CIRMS)
expounded on Malonzo’s report by citing the case of Eduardo Cojuangco,
Jr’s Joint Venture Agreement cum Corporative Scheme in Negros Occidental,
where instead of transferring his 1,200 hectares of lands to farmworker
agrarian beneficiaries he offered them stocks to his corporate venture
company. ECJ still controls the “financing, production, development and
management of the venture,” Ombion said.
Ombion also
cited several SDO schemes being implemented in Negros, and similar other
programs of land reform sans land transfer.
More displacements and killings
Ramos added
that Macapagal-Arroyo’s full implementation of neoliberal policies
particularly her adherence to “WB’s market-assisted land reform program”
and her agriculture modernization program, have further displaced millions
of already landless and poor peasants.
Peasants
resisting these neoliberal onslaughts have been brutally suppressed by the
President’s state security forces. To date, peasants still bear the worst
records of human rights violations, Ramos said. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2005 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.