Iraq
Sgrena Shooting: Hit or
Message Sent?
By Kurt Nimmo
From
AxisofLogic.com
Italian journalist
Giuliana Sgrena has provided more details on her near murderous ordeal.
“There was no checkpoint and we were going at a normal speed,” Sgrena told
Radio Free Europe. “We were going
about 50-60 kilometers an hour—which for a place like this was completely
normal. We were not traveling along the normal road for the airport
we were traveling on a privileged road that is less
dangerous than the normal one where every day bombs explode.” (Emphasis
added.)
Obviously, a “privileged road” road in
Baghdad is one controlled by the U.S. military, in other words it is
extremely unlikely the resistance would have access.
Further details emerged in an account
Sgrena wrote for Il Manifesto (subsequently translated and posted on the
CNN site):
“The car kept on the road, going under
an underpass full of puddles and almost losing control to avoid them. We
all incredibly laughed. It was liberating. Losing control of the car in a
street full of water in Baghdad and maybe wind up in a bad car accident
after all I had been through would really be a tale I would not be able to
tell. Nicola Calipari sat next to me. The driver twice called the embassy
and in Italy that we were heading towards the airport that I knew was
heavily patrolled by U.S. troops. They told me that we were less than a
kilometer away…when…I only remember fire. At that point, a rain of fire
and bullets hit us, shutting up forever the cheerful voices of a few
minutes earlier.”
Note the “driver twice called the
embassy” and Sgrena’s description of the road as one “heavily patrolled by
U.S. troops,” negating the probability of a resistance attack. As for the
calls to the embassy, these were obviously monitored by the U.S. military
as it can be assumed all calls, especially from cells phones, are
monitored in Iraq.
Meanwhile,
ABC News, referring to Sgrena as a
“left-wing journalist” —and yet William Kristol is never called a
“right-wing journalist” when he writes for the “conservative” Weekly
Standard—concentrated on the ransom component of Sgrena’s release. “The
fact that the Americans don’t want negotiations to free the hostages is
known,” Sgrena told Sky TG24 television. “The fact that they do everything
to prevent the adoption of this practice to save the lives of people held
hostage, everybody knows that. So I don’t see why I should rule out that I
could have been the target.”
As well, ABC News gave wide play to the
Bushcon version of events. “As you know, in a situation where there is a
live combat zone, particularly this road to the airport, has been a
notorious area for car bombs, that people are making split-second
decisions, and it’s critically important that we get the facts before we
make judgments,” said White House counselor Dan Bartlett.
Either Bartlett is unaware of Sgrena’s
claim her vehicle was traveling on a “privileged road” or he is confident
most people are unaware of this—or at least Americans who tune into ABC
and Fox News may be unaware of it unless they follow the European
media—and thus can brazenly dismiss the Sgrena shooting as an “accident”
occurring in a “combat zone” where “split-second decisions” are made, in
other words, according to Bartlett, Sgrena fell victim to yahoo soldiers
with trigger fingers.
It is interesting to read accounts of
the Italian government attempting to salvage its relationship with the
Bushcons as thousands of Italians fill the streets, outraged by the
shooting of Sgrena and the murder of Nicola Calipari. “An Italian cabinet
member urged Sgrena, who writes for a communist newspaper that routinely
opposes U.S. policy in Iraq, to be cautious in her accounts and said the
shooting would not affect Italy’s support for the administration of
President George W. Bush,” a relationship at odds with the wishes of many
if not most Italians, who opposed Berlusconi’s sign-off on the illegal and
immoral invasion and occupation of Iraq. “The shooting has fuelled
anti-American sentiment in a country where people have deeply opposed the
war in Iraq, but it did not this weekend provoke mass protests like those
that have drawn tens of thousands of people into the streets,” reports
CBC News.
Naturally, over on the right, the idea
that the U.S would fire on a car unprovoked—or even intentionally—is
considered something bordering on sacrilege. “Mainstream media is beyond
disgusting on this one,” writes
Little Green Footballs. “They are
doing everything possible to indict our troops based on the words of
dissembling anti-war Italian communists.” Of course, if not for the
dissembler par excellence Bush—who lied in his way into an invasion and
occupation that has killed more than 100,000 Iraqis—there would be no
“anti-war Italian communists.”
Finally, as others have noted, including
the right-wing green football guy, if the U.S. military had wanted to kill
Sgrena, she would be dead now, as would everybody in the car carrying her
to the airport. I believe the U.S. did not want to kill Giuliana Sgrena so
much as send a message to independent journalists in Iraq—reporting the
truth may get you kidnapped, killed, or both. It should be obvious by now
that the Pentagon is not only at war with the Iraqi people, they are also
at war with the truth, as the murder of an extraordinary number of
journalists (more
than 50 as of early February) and attacking
hospitals—considered propaganda centers—amply demonstrate.
SECOND ARTICLE. Link to
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/21427/
Mar 7, 2005
BACK TO TOP ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■ Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.