Ex-Comelec Exec Says 2004 Poll Fraud Not Yet Closed
A former commissioner
of the Commission on Elections said that the issue of alleged fraud in the
2004 presidential election is not yet closed as documents on the alleged
cheating were shown at a Senate hearing.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN
REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
A former commissioner
of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) said that the issue of alleged
fraud in the 2004 presidential election is far from being a closed issue,
as documents of cheating in the 2004 presidential elections were presented
at the Senate last week.
“It’s difficult to
close such an issue,” lawyer Mejol Sadain told Bulatlat in an
interview. Sadain retired from the Comelec in February.
President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo has been hounded by allegations of electoral fraud even
before she was proclaimed winner of the 2004 presidential election. The
surfacing in mid-2005 of the so-called “Hello Garci” tapes further fuelled
these allegations. In the tapes, a woman with a voice similar to Arroyo’s
instructed an election official, widely believed to be former Comelec
Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano, to rig the polls in her favor.
Comelec Chairman
Benjamin Abalos dismissed the allegations of poll fraud in 2004, saying
the issue is a closed book.
“So many questions
are still unanswered, and I think it’s not for the Comelec to immediately
say that there has been no cheating,” Sadain said. “It is for the Comelec
to investigate whether or not there was really cheating. Only thereafter
can we say whether or not there was cheating.”
No investigation
of cheating allegations
When the “Hello Garci”
tapes surfaced, Sadain issued a memorandum to the commission en banc
to refrain from talking to the media about the issue pending an
investigation. The en banc commission then created a committee to
look into the allegations.
“The problem was,
Chairman Abalos’ position was that we needed to authenticate the tapes
first before we can use them for the investigation,” Sadain disclosed.
Sadain said that
Comelec could have done the investigation even without an authentication
of the tapes.
“Why wait for the
authentication of the tapes when they themselves mention people –
officials of the Comelec? We are in official possession of documents which
were the ones allegedly used in the cheating. Why don’t we start there?
Let’s ask our people, let’s check our documents, get affidavits,” he said.
Nothing came out of
the investigation even as Sadain left the Comelec. “In so far as the
documents are concerned, they didn’t look into any of these,” he said.
It is these
documents, Sadain said, that are now surfacing in the ongoing Senate
investigation on the “Hello Garci” controversy.
Indications of
“election manipulation”
During the Senate
hearing last week, Comelec Commissioner Resurreccion Borra admitted that
the 2004 election was marred by irregularities.
Sadain said that
while he did not see the documents presented to the Senate, he still
believes what Borra said. “I’m inclined to believe him because he knows
the documents and he knows what he’s talking about. There are really
indications that there was election manipulation particularly in the
Muslim areas.”
Borra, however, said
the cheating was not done by one party or candidate alone, but was
“endemic.”
Sadain agreed,
however, saying that the candidates most capable of cheating are usually
those who are incumbent. “They command a vast array of resources. They are
the ones who have people, who have money, who have power, they’re the ones
with the advantage,” he said.
This is the reason
the 1987 Constitution prohibits a second term for a sitting president, he
added. “Because the president controls a vast array of resources,” he
said. “So if he or she runs for reelection, he or she can always use this
array of resources against his or her opponents.”
A technicality
circumvented the constitutional provision seeking to prevent this, Sadain
added.
Criticism not
destabilization
Asked to comment on
Abalos’ recent statement that the renewed allegations of fraud in the 2004
election “could be part of another destabilization plot,” Sadain chose to
give a general statement.
“There
can be no destabilization if there is no weakness in the foundation of the
government,” he said. “Besides, when you criticize certain institutions
and institutional processes, it is unfair to almost always label these
criticisms as destabilization. There are criticisms which are constructive
and are aimed to improve the system. So how could you differentiate
constructive criticism from other forms of criticism if you immediately
say that these are destabilization moves?” Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.