This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. VI, No. 2, February 12-18, 2006
Batagueños Ask SC to Reverse CA Decision on CARP
Land
Hundreds of
farmers, residents and members of local government units (LGUs) in Nasugbu,
Batangas have trooped to the Supreme Court (SC) to petition for the
nullification of the Court of Appeals ruling granting the petition of Roxas &
Co., Inc., in exempting its entire 2,930-ha. property – situated in Caylaway,
Palico and Banilad villages – from coverage of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform
Program (CARP). The SC is expected to decide on the matter within the first
semester of the year.
BY MARICRISTH MAGALING
Hundreds of farmers, residents and
members of local government units (LGUs) in Nasugbu, Batangas have trooped to
the Supreme Court (SC) to petition for the nullification of the Court of Appeals
ruling granting the petition of Roxas & Co., Inc., in exempting its entire
2,930-ha. property – situated in Caylaway, Palico and Banilad villages – from
coverage of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP). The SC is expected
to decide on the matter within the first semester of the year.
Clarito Caisip, chairperson of the
Alyansa 1520, an alliance of 23 organizations of Nasigbu residents expressed
fears that an SC affirmation of the decision could trigger massive land
grabbing and would affect not only the properties of Roxas & Co., Inc., but the
entire Nasugbu town. "Ibig sabihin nito, hindi lamang kaming mga magsasaka ang
apektado kundi ang lahat sa bayan ng Nasugbu" (This means that we farmers are
not the only ones to be affected but everyone in Nasugbu), he said.
Alyansa 1520 further said that the
CA decision declaring automatic reclassification of the entire Nasugbu town,
penned by Justice Jose Sabio, Jr., grossly misapplied Presidential Proclamation
1520 in the petition of Roxas for CARP exemption. The said proclamation dated
Nov. 28, 1975 by then President Ferdinand Marcos has declared only "certain
areas in the sector comprising the municipalities of Maragondon and Ternate in
Cavite Province and Nasugbu in Batangas" as eco-tourism development areas.
Following the CA application of
Presidential Proclamation 1520, the alliance feared that it will also amount to
massive landgrabbing on a nationwide scale, for other places declared as tourist
zones: Brgy. Patag in Silay City in Negros Occidental, the municipalities of
Laurel, Balete, Agoncillo, San Nicolas and Talisay, and Limasawa Island in
Southern Leyte, the municipalities of Boac, Buenavista and Torrijos in
Marinduque, municipality of Peñablanca, and the provinces of Cagayan, Bataan,
Ilocos Norte and others.
Memorandum Circular No. 07 of the
Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), provides guidelines on the effect of
declarations of general areas in the country as "tourist zones" to the coverage
of lands devoted to or suitable for agriculture within the said areas under
CARP. It recognizes that "proclamations declaring general areas such as whole
provinces, municipalities, barangays, islands or peninsulas as tourist zones
that merely recognize certain still unidentified areas with potential tourism
value and recognize the potential value of identified spots located within the
general area declared as tourist zones could not be regarded as effecting an
automatic reclassification of the entirety of the land declared as tourist
zones. "
The memorandum further said it
would be "unreasonable" to see these kinds of proclamation as a reclassification
for non-agricultural purposes of entire provinces, municipalities, barangays,
islands or peninsulas as it amounts to an "automatic and sweeping exemption from
CARP in the name of tourism development.This would also undermine the land use
reclassification powers vested in local government units (LGUs) in conjunction
with pertinent agencies of government."
Caisip maintained that the CA
decision ignored the certifications issued by the Philippine Tourism Authority
(PTA) and the Mayor's Office that they have yet to identify the specific
geographical areas with tourism potential in Nasugbu. It likewise ignored the Nasugbu Sangguniang
Bayan (People’s Council) Resolution attesting to the fact that no ordinance or
comprehensive land use plan has converted Roxas properties or portions thereof
to non-agricultural use.
What has deeply alarmed the
farmers and the LGU, Caisip said, is the fact that while the Supreme Court
Second Division has given due course to the petition of aggrieved farmers in
Nasugbu and ordered the consolidation of their petition with a similar
petition filed by the Department of Agrarian Reform pending before the Supreme
Court Third Division, the Supreme Court Third Division ignored the order of
consolidation and dismissed the petition in a one-sentence paragraph Minute
Resolution, for supposed failure to show reversible error committed by the
appellate court.
"Moreover, while the Supreme Court
has yet to determine with finality whether or not the entire property of Roxas
in Nasugbu is exempt from CARP coverage, several petitions for cancellation of
certificate for land ownership award (CLOAs) have already been filed by Roxas
involving various portions of their property,” Caisip added. "In addition,
several duplicitous petitions for CARP Exemption have also been filed with the
DAR involving various portions of the Roxas property."
Alyansa 1520 also stated all these
petitions were granted by the DAR through “midnight” decisions penned by former
DAR Secretaries Hernani Braganza and Roberto Pagdanganan, which are now the
subject of various cases pending with the SC in different Divisions, the Court
of Appeals, the Provincial Adjudication Board and the DAR Secretary's Office.
Alyansa 1520 is fully supported by
the local government unit (LGU), Sangguniang Bayan, Liga ng mga Barangay
Captains (village captains’ league), Liga ng mga Homeowners Associations (league
of homeowners associations), and Liga ng mga Barangay Agrarian Reform Committees
(league of village agrarian reform committees). Bulatlat © 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Contributed to Bulatlat