Prosecution ends presentation in celebrated Subic rape case
Evidences,
Testimonies, Point to Accused U.S. Marine
As the prosecution
panel in the Subic rape case trial ends its presentation of witnesses and
evidence, its lawyers are confident that they have pieced out the puzzle
showing the four accused U.S. Marines guilty.
BY JHONG DELA CRUZ
Bulatlat
Prosecution
lawyers in the Subic rape case ended their presentation on Aug. 17, with a
police expert confirming that the DNA sample found in the Filipina
victim’s underwear indeed belonged to principal accused Lance Corporal
Daniel Smith.
Lead
prosecutor Evalyn Ursua expressed confidence their evidences and the
witnesses’ testimonies had pieced out the puzzle of the fateful Nov. 1,
2005 when four U.S. Marines allegedly raped a 22-year-old Filipino woman.
Also accused
with Smith are Lance Corporals Dominic Duplantis and Keith Silkwood and
Staff Sergeant Chad Carpentier.
23rd
witness
The
prosecution presented its 23rd witness, Sr. Inspector Edmar
dela Torre who conducted the matching of both DNA samples extracted from
the victim’s panties and Smith’s blood.
Tested at
the Philippine National Police Crime Laboratory, Dela Torre said the
samples were of “primary match,” resulting in a 10 percent accuracy rate.
The DNA sample obtained from the victim’s underwear had not been
contaminated, bearing no such indication during the test, dela Torre told
the court.
The analyst
received the samples on June 26 from the evidence custodian. His findings,
he told the court, revealed that the “DNA is that of Daniel Smith.” The
defense refused to further ask questions during the cross-examination.
Meanwhile,
before the police analyst took the witness stand, the Makati Regional
Trial Court Branch 139 recalled Dr. Rolando Ortiz, medico-legal officer at
the James L. Gordon Hospital who examined “Nicole” on Nov. 3, 2005.
The court
had ordered Ortiz to testify again to explain the history-taking procedure
he had conducted with “Nicole.” The procedure involves inquiring about
past and present sexual relationships of victims of sexual assault.
Ursua
opposed this saying having sex in the past would not indicate that there
was no rape because the assault could happen even inside a marriage. She
cited section 6 of the Rape Shield Law which said
that “in prosecutions for rape, evidence of complainant's past sexual
conduct, opinion thereof or his/her reputation, shall not be admitted
unless, and only to the extent that the court finds that such evidence is
material and relevant to the case.”
Fishing
expedition
The victim,
a Zamboanga native, told the doctor she last had a consensual sexual
intercourse with her boyfriend two years ago, Ortiz said.
The defense
argued old-healed lacerations in both sides of the labia minora, if proven
there had been such activity before the alleged rape, the findings might
change in the medico-legal procedure.
But Ursua
asked the court to reconsider the question saying the defense panel is
engaged in a “fishing expedition” because the answer might have no
boundaries and that this would only “humiliate” the complainant.
Asked why
there was no spermatozoa found in the vagina by Judge Benjamin Pozon
during the court’s clarificatory questions, Dr. Ortiz answered because
there might have been no ejaculation at all, or that the accused had used
condom during the alleged sexual assault.
Earlier,
Ortiz had testified the reddish contusions on both sides of the labia
minora were caused by “a blunt object applied with force.” He re-affirmed
the findings when asked by Pozon whether it might have been caused by
illness, and:
“Contusions
may be caused when a woman’s private part is not lubricated, or [if her]
thighs are closed injury could occur during the penetration,” he said.
Corroborated
After 23
witnesses, the prosecution concluded they were very satisfied with how the
proceedings for their evidences and witness testimonies corroborated the
claim of the complainant.
The victim
had earlier testified she was too drunk to fight Smith during the sexual
assault. She described him as heavy when she gained consciousness and
found out he was on top of her.
She was having a vacation with her
two sisters at the former U.S. naval base when, according to her, she was
intoxicated by alcoholic drinks.
She only
remembered refusing Smith’s insistence to get out of the Neptune Club, a
popular nightspot at the Freeport. Later she knew she was taken inside the
van where she claimed to have been raped at the backseat.
On July 11,
leading forensic expert Dr. Raquel Fortun confirmed that the injuries
sustained by Nicole indicate that rape and not consensual sex took place
on the night of Nov. 1 last year. This is because in a normal consensual
sexual activity, injuries in the genitalia are unusual, she said.
Less than 10
The court
will resume hearing on Sept. 11 when the defense panel will present its
side.
Last June, Ursua filed a petition for
certiorari seeking full custody of the four U.S. servicemen involved in
the rape case. If granted, this would prevent the soldiers from “getting
off the hook,” since the case would no longer follow the one year
allowable case hearing for U.S. soldiers in the country. The prosecution
is battling the December 29 deadline of the court proceedings.
If proven guilty, the accused would be
meted out a 40-year imprisonment. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.