Melo Probe Body a Waste of Money, CHR Exec Says
The Commission on
Human Rights (CHR), Karapatan, an alliance of human rights organizations,
and groups of human rights lawyers agree that the Melo Commission merely
duplicates the functions of the CHR. They also believe that the Melo
commission’s probe will amount to nothing as it lacks prosecutory powers.
Proof of this is that eight more activists have been killed after the
formation of the Melo Commission last August 21.
BY DABET CASTAÑEDA
Bulatlat
Saying that the
newly-formed Melo Commission will duplicate the functions of the
Commission on Human Rights (CHR), an executive of the independent human
rights body said the newly formed Melo Commission might just be “a waste
of money.”
Eduardo Diansuy,
public relations officer of the Commission on Human Rights, said that the
formation of the Melo Commission is contrary to the government’s policy of
retrenchment and streamlining by giving the said body similar functions
with that of the existing rights commission.
The CHR was created
after the Filipino people toppled the Marcos dictatorship through a
popular revolt that culminated in the historic Epifanio delos Santos
Avenue (EDSA). Preceded by a Presidential Committee on Human Rights, the
CHR was formed as an independent office by virtue of the 1987
Constitution.
In fact, Diansuy said
it might not just be duplicating the functions of the CHR but also of the
Presidential Human Rights Commission (PHRC) which has similar functions
but is under the Department of Justice (DoJ).
What Diansuy
suggested, in stead, was for Congress to strengthen the functions of the
CHR by giving it powers to prosecute violators of the civil, political and
human rights of an individual or groups of people. He said they have
lobbied in Congress but to no avail.
In a separate
interview, people’s lawyer Neri Colmenares said one of the primary
problems of any commission investigating human rights abuses is its lack
of powers over the suspected violators. “The military has no fear of any
commission that has no powers to prosecute. They will just shun any
probe,” he said.
Colmenares said it
was even surprising for the president to create a separate investigating
body now that the victims and their families perceive the CHR as an
acceptable investigating body.
Diansuy however said
that the creation of the Melo Commission would not stop the CHR from
performing its tasks. It has in fact concluded two public inquiries in
Central and Northern Luzon where reported violations are concentrated, he
said.
Doubt
The creation of the
Melo Commission has been viewed with skepticism by victims of rights
violations and the human rights community. “We have not been consulted
about its formation and we are not aware of the processes it will follow
in investigating the political killings,” Ruth Cervantes, Public
Information Officer of the human rights watchdog Karapatan (Alliance for
the Advancement of Peoples’ Rights) said in a separate interview.
“At dahil hanggang
ngayon ay hindi nila kami kinakausap, hindi namin alam kung pahahalagahan
ba ng Melo Commission ang mga pahayag ng mga biktima,”
(Up to now they have not even contacted us. That is why we doubt whether
the Melo Commission will value the statement of the victims and their
relatives.) she added.
Diansuy and Cervantes
confirmed that both their groups have not been formally invited to
participate in the investigations. On the other hand, Chief State
Prosecutor Jovencito Zuño said in a telephone interview that the
commission would have its first public hearing on Sept. 12. Philippine
National Police (PNP) Deputy Director Avelino Razon, head of Task Force
Usig, will be the first to testify.
Task Force Usig (TFU
or Task Force Investigate) was the first body created by the president to
investigate the killings of journalists and activists nationwide.
Comprised mainly by the PNP, the task force had difficulties getting the
cooperation of witnesses and relatives of victims as agents of the state
are the main suspects in the killings. It further suffered from problems
of credibility after it made public announcements that reiterated the line
of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) that the political killings
were a result of a “purge” by the communist movement.
Cervantes said recent
events, including the formation of the Melo Commission, are alarming to
the human rights community because it apparently is leading towards a
whitewash that will absolve the military and the Macapagal Arroyo
government. Karapatan has documented at least 752 political killings while
181 have been abducted and remain missing as of Sept. 9. Relatives of
victims as well as survivors blame AFP and PNP forces or military death
squads for the killings and abductions.
Cervantes also said
that since the commission was formed, August 21, another eight activists
have been killed. This, Cervantes said, shows that the commission is
toothless.
Cervantes said the
Melo Commission should first prove its independence and transparency
before Karapatan would agree to participate in its investigations.
Karapatan, she said,
is also demanding for the removal of Zuño and Nestor Mantaring of the
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) from the probe body. “They have
shown nothing as far as investigating the military’s killing spree during
the past five years. They have no place in the Melo Commission,” Cervantes
said.
After more than 700
killings have been reported, the NBI has not presented any suspect to the
public while the DoJ, Cervantes said, has done nothing but file rebellion
cases against progressive members of the Lower House or known leaders of
progressive organizations.
Political will
On the other hand,
National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) chair Joe Torres
said the media has already been cooperating with both the TFU and the Melo
Commission. “What we are looking for is the government’s political will in
solving the cases especially those that have been brought to court,” he
said. “It is not enough to convict the triggermen. The investigators
should also be able to unmask the masterminds,” he said. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.