|
Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to
search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts
Vol. VI, No. 31 Sept.
10 - 16, 2006 Quezon City, Philippines |
|
HOME
ARCHIVE
CONTACT
RESOURCES
ABOUT BULATLAT
www.bulatlat.com
www.bulatlat.net
www.bulatlat.org
|
READER FEEDBACK
(We encourage readers to dialogue with us.
Email us
your letters complaints, corrections, clarifications, etc.)
|
|
|
DEMOCRATIC SPACE
(Email us your
letters statements, press releases, manifestos, etc.) |
|
|
For
turning the screws on hot issues, Bulatlat has been awarded
the Golden Tornillo Award.
Iskandalo
Cafe
|
|
Copyright 2004 Bulatlat bulatlat@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
alternative reader no. 142
UN Rights Experts Watch Pendulum Swing in 'War on
Terror'
By Agence
France Presse
Posted by Bulatlat
GENEVA — UN human rights experts saw torture, Military prisons and
deprivation of civil liberties rear their ugly head in the post-Sept. 11
anti-terrorism drive, including in the very countries where they least
expected to see such steps.
"After Sept. 11, 2001 there was an alarming trend of the Western world
closing its eyes when anything was done in the name of fighting
terrorism," explained Martin Scheinin, the UN special rapporteur on the
protection of human rights while countering terrorism.
"States are taking measures that bit-by-bit cut our established human
rights. That affects everybody, all citizens in every country."
Five years on, the US government is suddenly facing a string of negative
Supreme Court verdicts at home, pressure from Congress and condemnation by
key United Nations human rights watchdogs for some of the measures it took
in its "war on terror."
And the spotlight is also shining more intensely on other countries where
efforts to tackle a terrorist threat are invoked as a justification to
weaken human rights protection, Scheinin said.
"The story of human rights and counter-terrorism is not simply a nightmare
that's getting worse," he told AFP.
"We are dealing with a pendulum," Scheinin added, highlighting the
"promising" swing produced by recent national judicial rulings and
international human rights bodies.
In a report to the UN's top human rights forum earlier this year, the
Finnish law professor identified five worrying "trends" in
counter-terrorism efforts.
They include the "compromising" of an international ban on torture and
degrading or inhuman treatment, and a resurgence of states clamping down
on political opponents, ethnic groups or "people they simply don't like."
Scheinin also highlighted tightened immigration controls that resort to
racial, ethnic or religious profiling, the softening of legal safeguards
for suspects in police investigations, and attempts to prosecute people
for "apology" of terrorism.
But the torture issue stands out for the human rights community.
"Nine-eleven was a major change," said Manfred Nowak, the UN special
rapporteur on torture.
"For the first time in the history of human rights protection, the
absolute prohibition of torture has been put in question not only by
dictatorships but also by those democracies that are most directly
targeted by the terrorist threat."
In June, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour warned that
secret detention centers for terror suspects alleged to have been set up
by the United States abroad "have a corrosive effect on the rule of law."
"There the danger is greater that people are subjected to torture than in
a known place of detention such as Guantanamo Bay," Nowak explained.
A month later the UN Human Rights Committee, which oversees the world's
core treaty on civil and political rights, concluded after examining US
arguments that Washington must abolish those centers.
In May, the UN Committee on Torture told the US to eradicate abuses by its
personnel, shut the Guantanamo Bay detention center, and stop handing
detainees over to countries where they could be at risk.
That legal scrutiny underlined clear limits to what can be done, according
to the UN experts.
Yet, Western countries still seem ready to overstep the mark, according to
Nowak.
He highlighted British moves to expel suspects to Algeria, or to Jordan,
Libya and Lebanon based on a pledge that they would not be mistreated.
"In Jordan my fact-finding confirmed that it is not safe to send people
back there, even on the basis of diplomatic assurances," the Austrian
expert said.
Many "less democratic states" hold up US measures as a justification for
their approach to fighting terrorism, he added.
Scheinin has detected more repression in Central Asian republics.
Nowak expects Russian authorities to raise similar justification for their
conduct of more than a decade of conflict with Chechen and Islamist rebels
during his mission there in October. AFP / Posted by Bulatlat
Sept. 8, 2006
BACK TO
TOP ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
|
|
|
|