World Bank Corruption
Ranking Should Widen Debate on Anti-corruption Strategies
The
World Bank, in its recently-released "Governance Matters 2006" report,
gave the country a lower ranking in its control of corruption benchmark,
falling from 50.5% in 1998 to 37.4% in 2005.
BY IBON
FOUNDATION
Posted by Bulatlat
The World Bank, in its
recently-released "Governance Matters 2006" report, gave the country a
lower ranking in its control of corruption benchmark, falling from 50.5%
in 1998 to 37.4% in 2005.
The declining rank indicated that the
ability of the Philippines to improve governance and curb corruption has
declined based on the index for control of corruption, defined as the
extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including
petty and grand forms of corruption and the "capture" of the state by
elite and private interests.
Although the lower ranking is welcome
for pointing out the worsening corruption situation in the country, it
should also be an occasion to deepen the debate on the corruption issue
and how to address it, said IBON research director Antonio Tujan.
For instance, he said that the World
Bank's definition of corruption over-emphasizes government accountability
while failing to acknowledge that privatization, liberalization, and
deregulation policies promoted by multilateral organizations such as the
International Monetary Fund and the World Bank itself create
"opportunities" for corruption by local agents. "These policies breed
corruption, and if these cases are taken into account, we will find that
corruption in the
Philippines is even much worse than what the World Bank reported," said
Tujan.
Under the World Bank framework, the
Arroyo administration's anti-corruption efforts thus focuses only on
administrative reforms such as lifestyle checks and reinforcing the
Ombudsman, and not on strategies that address the most visible forms of
grand corruption, for example, large government contracts and concessions.
Tujan cited the fiasco surrounding the
privatization of the Masinloc coal-fired power plant, which was marred by
graft and corruption involving officials in charge of the privatization of
state-owned National Power Corporation (Napocor). "The privatization of
public services and utilities has been pushed by creditors like the IMF
and World Bank in such a way as to allow impunity and even legality to the
dubious dealings of multinational firms and large-scale national
businesses," he said.
Thus, any effective anti-corruption
strategy must take into account the impact of IMF-World Bank structural
adjustment policies on governance and corruption, Tujan said. IBON
Foundation/posted by Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.