Commentary
US Interventions
BY ELMER A. ORDOÑEZ
The Other View - Manila Times
Posted by Bulatlat
There were two
reported US interventions in the recent aborted "coup plot" leading to
1017 followed by its lifting a week later but belied by continuing
repressive police/military actions (on party-list members, the media,
leftist and opposition figures and users of cyberspace).
The first version of
the US traditional role (gleaned from a broadsheet column) is that the
plotters were warned by US agents not to go through with their conspiracy,
otherwise 5,000 US Marines already in the country under the Visiting
Forces Agreement would stop them.
The other version,
apparently contradicting the other, was that the coup plot was instigated
by US agents themselves who supposedly called the restive military leaders
"meatheads" for not moving to oust the leadership that had become a
liability to US
interests—like the war on terror.
The first version is
consistent with earlier US official and business statements that any
regime change must be constitutional. It seems that the US has had it with
the present administration whose continuing repression of civil liberties
would be an embarrassment to US professed policy of "spreading democracy"
around the world.
The second version
may be seen in the context of William Blum's Rogue State which gives as a
lurid catalogue of US covert and overt interventions (from 1945 to the
present) into the affairs of other nations during the Cold War, the US
fight against the Soviet Union and other socialist states (like China,
North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba), and national liberation struggles
(particularly in the Third World). Now add Iran and Syria as US targets.
US policy then was
one of "containment" to prevent "developing" nations from falling under
the influence of either Soviet Union or the People's Republic of China.
The US went to war in Vietnam precisely to negate the "domino theory"
inherent in its "national security doctrine" underpinning US foreign
policy. Under the Bush's policy of waging war on terror, the
US
has embarked on ill-advised military incursions in
Afghanistan and Iraq where, as in Vietnam,
US troops are dying and hard put to disengage themselves from the quagmire
of suicide bombings and escalating civil war. Key officials in the
conduct of the US war in Vietnam like Kissinger and Haig, speaking in a
postmortem forum, are either on denial mode or conscience stricken—unable
to see the connection of the
Vietnam debacle with what is
happening in Iraq. As President Johnson said in 1966: "I oughtn't to be in
this country [Vietnam] but I can't get out."
The lessons of
Vietnam have not been grasped by local supporters of the war in Iraq. I
remember nationalist writers here warned about the perils of supporting
the US war in Iraq in the name of fighting terrorists (their slogan after
9/11). Then the US began labeling as terrorist national liberation
forces/personalities—effectively stopping NDF/GRP peace talks.
The history of US
intervention in this country goes back to the turn of the century when revolutionary forces had
practically defeated the Spanish troops—surrounding its remnants in
Intramuros. What followed was a series of US betrayals of Filipino
interests and a ruinous Philippine-American war. The "benevolent
assimilation" or "pacification" drive of the US had so thoroughly
Americanized our way of life and thinking that by the time the country
became nominally independent in 1946 our leaders and most of the people
looked up to the US for practically everything. It would take
nationalist-minded leaders and groups in struggle to regain our humanity
and pride as a people.
William Blum has this
to say about US intervention after EDSA:
"Another scenario of poverty, social
injustice, death squads, torture, etc. leading to wide-ranging protest and
armed resistance. . . time once again for the US military and CIA to come
to the aid of the government in suppressing such movements. In 1987 it
was revealed that the Reagan administration had approved a $10 million,
two-year plan for increased CIA involvement in the counterinsurgency
campaign. The CIA undertook large-scale psychological warfare operations
and US military advisers routinely accompanied Philippine troops during
their maneuvers. The Philippines has long been the most strategic location
for US war-making in Asia, the site of several large American military
bases, which have been the object of numerous protests by the citizens. In
1991 the US Embassy informed the media that embassy polls indicated that
68 percent, 72 percent, even 81 percent of the Philippine people favored
the bases. The polls, however, never existed. 'I made the numbers up,' an
embassy official conceded."
The US bases are gone
(thanks to nationalist protests), but a Visiting Forces Agreement,
gratuitously ratified later by the Senate, has indeed the effect of
enabling US Marines to intervene
militarily in Philippine affairs. Posted by Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.