High Time For Bayan Muna—
Or Why It Topped the May Party-List Polls

The last Congress made history of sorts in November last year when it passed impeachment proceedings against then President Joseph Estrada—the first of its kind in the Philippines. But it was People Power 2 that completed Congress’ job by ousting Estrada from power through a bloodless people’s uprising. In the thick of that struggle was Bayan Muna, the Leftist party-list group which four months later would top the party-list elections. It will be a new kind of struggle that the party will wage when its three nominees occupy their House seats come July. But first, a look at how Bayan Muna did it.

By Edmundo Santuario III
Bulatlat.com

Voter awareness of the party-list system remains in the main low even if it slightly increased in the recent elections. If the recent poll results are any indication, however, the prospects for an issue-oriented politics—represented by the Left’s Bayan Muna—making a dent in the electoral system traditionally blazed by personalities with guns, goons and gold are brighter. The end of traditional politics has begun.

Based on the election results, more Filipinos voted in the party-list system than in 1998: 14.01 million (or 45 percent of the total votes cast) as against 9.15 million (or 33 percent).

The increase in the party-list votes (PLVs) can be partly attributed to the fact that the total votes cast (TVC) in the last elections went up to 31.98 million out of a total number of registered voters (TRVs) of 36.59 million, as against 27.30 million from a TRV of 34.16 million in 1998. The Social Weather Station (SWS) exit polls survey registered an 89 percent voter turnout in the May elections.

However, with 162 aspirants this year, the number of party-list groups who made it to the winner’s circle was smaller by 3 compared to 1998: 10 as against 13. While the winning parties in 1998 needed at least 182,000 votes to gain a seat, those in the recent elections needed 280,000 votes each.

Topping the list was Bayan Muna, with 1.7 million votes or 11.71 percent of PLVs, with 3 seats in tow. (Technically, the group’s total votes could have given it a total of 6 seats.)  Next, was the controversial Mamamayan Ayaw sa Droga (MAD or People Against Drugs), with 1.5 million or 10.43 percent, also 3 seats.

Representing Bayan Muna in the next Congress are former National Democratic Front (NDF) chief negotiator Satur Ocampo, labor leader Crispin Beltran and Liza Maza of Gabriela. MAD, reportedly a quasi-government party that under the 1987 Constitution should be disqualified, will be represented by matinee idol Richard Gomez. Gomez was a former youth adviser of ousted president Joseph Estrada.

Trailing far behind the two topnotchers were APEC (726,974 votes or 5.10 percent, 2 seats), VFP (564,196 votes or 3.96 percent, 1 seat), PROMDI (428,366 or 3.01 percent, 1 seat), Akbayan (357,274 or 2.51 percent, 1 seat), NPC (346,274 or 2.43 percent, 1 seat), Butil (321,062 or 2.25 percent, 1 seat), LakasNUCD-UMDP (321,013 or 2.25 percent, 1 seat) and CIBAC (311,027 or 2.18 percent, 1 seat).

The VFP (Veterans Federation of the Philippines) is reportedly government-funded, CIBAC is the pro-Arroyo party-list group of the Jesus is Lord Movement while PROMDI, NPC (Nationalist People’s Coalition) and LakasNUCD-UMDP are actually major traditional political parties (trapos, a Philippine colloquial).

Losers

APEC, a well-funded electric cooperatives’ party, topped the 1998 party-list polls. Among the “alternative” parties trounced in the last May polls were Abanse!Pinay, which garnered only 125,041 votes, Sanlakas and others. Had not Sanlakas put up another party-list group, Partido ng Manggagawa (PM) in the May elections, their total combined votes of 336,684 would have earned them at least one seat. It was yet another blunder for Sanlakas, a self-styled leftist group that bolted from the mainstream national democrats in the early ‘90s.

Bayan Muna’s showing in the May polls is acknowledged to be unprecedented. It emerged the topnotcher despite smear campaigns that it was a “communist front.” The total number of votes it got was three times bigger than that of the 1998 leader (APEC) and was almost equivalent to the combined votes of the top five placers during the same year. It was also way past the total garnered by the three major political parties, the combined votes of five “leftist” party-list groups (Akbayan, Sanlakas, PM, Amin and Atin) and those of seven reformist groups (Butil, ABA, Abanse!Pinay, Ako, BagongBayani, Bandila and PDSP).

The Leftist party-list group’s impressive showing had been in the political barometers of three major national surveys: the pre-poll ratings of Pulse Asia (early March) and SWS (late April) and in the SWS/ABS-CBN exit polls (May 14). The three surveys showed Bayan Muna’s high ratings among the young and old, rich and poor, educated or not, employed and jobless as well as among all shades of political and religious beliefs.

The party’s relatively well-organized grassroots machinery delivered the votes from the regions. Its total votes would have been bigger had not the party been reportedly defrauded of its votes in many provincial precincts and black propaganda unleashed against it in the campaign homestretch by Akbayan, Sanlakas and other party-list claimants. Bayan Muna reported 32 incidents where its campaigners including leading nominee Ocampo were intimidated. In these incidents, at least 10 were killed. One incident involved Sanlakas members beating up some Bayan Muna volunteers with steel baseball bats.

Oust-Estrada struggle

Bayan Muna sources trace their party’s electoral performance to the fact that from the moment the call was sounded for Estrada’s ouster until his fall, it was among organized forces in the forefront. Surprisingly, however, it was able to win votes even from individuals and groups who remained loyal to Estrada. Similarly, while projecting itself as the party of the poor it also gained sympathizers from among the progressive middle forces and the elite.

Further, many individuals who voted for reformist and “leftist” groups in 1998, went for the neophyte Bayan Muna this time. Some of them said that having seen the mediocre performance of many of the 1998 party-list winners, the new party-list group holds the greatest promise of living up to its electoral platform.

But the election turnout does not appear to be Bayan Muna’s only source of strength. Its entry in the electoral arena has also infused some sense of hope in the country’s hopeless political system as many individuals, particularly among the youth and students in Metro Manila and in the provinces, have signified their interest in joining Bayan Muna.

Still, the dominance of the elite and traditional politicians in the next Congress remains intact, as the election results show. Bayan Muna, together with the other party-list groups will, quantitatively speaking, remain a minority. That is not to say however that their participation won’t create a ripple one way or the other.

Listen to Ocampo: “Our immediate objective as radical opposition in Congress is to articulate, argue and demonstrate the urgent need for basic economic, political and social change. Bayan Muna will oppose anti-people and anti-national legislation and push a progressive legislative agenda, which can mitigate the harsh plight of our suffering people."

The new Congress is indeed worth watching because it won’t be the same again. To quote a recent newspaper editorial, “Legislators can now ignore the party-list representatives at their peril.” Bulatlat.com

 


We want to know what you think of this article.