Government Uses
Employment Figures to Paint Rosy Picture
The President’s past,
present and future state-of-the-nation addresses (SONAs) have something in
common: Government is wont to use statistics as basis for claiming
economic growth, particularly how it results in job generation. The same
statistics, however, can be interpreted to prove the exact opposite.
BY DANILO ARAÑA ARAO
Bulatlat
The President’s past,
present and future state-of-the-nation addresses (SONAs) have something in
common: Government is wont to use statistics as basis for claiming
economic growth, particularly how it results in job generation. The same
statistics, however, can be interpreted to prove the exact opposite.
Differences in
interpretation are not just rooted in the framework one uses. It is not
just an issue of a half-filled glass of water being seen as either
half-empty or half-full, depending on one’s mindset. In the case of
government officials, it appears that they tend to highlight only the
aspects that are useful to bolster their claims of a good labor situation.
An advertisement of
the Philippine Information Agency (PIA) titled “Let the Numbers Speak: Our
Economy is on the Upswing” gives one the impression that Filipinos have a
lot of reasons to celebrate, particularly on the issue of job generation.
Press Secretary Ignacio Bunye reinforced this optimistic outlook when he
said last July 21 that while the country is facing challenges, “the
bullish outlook is undiminished.”
In the PIA
advertisement, the Arroyo administration is said to have created 4.9
million jobs as of December 2005, already “nearly half-way” the
government’s target of 10 million jobs by 2010. Investments in the
Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) worth P68 billion ($1.3 billion,
based on an exchange rate of P52.165 per US dollar) reportedly created
70,000 new jobs in 2005. Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) jobs, examples
of which are call center agents, reportedly increased to 162,250 jobs for
Filipinos also in 2005.
These figures have
hardly made a dent in the country’s labor situation. According to the
Labor Force Survey, there are still 2.9 million jobless Filipinos and 8.4
million underemployed (working less than 40 hours weekly) as of April
2006. In the same way that no work means no income for the unemployed
Filipinos, less hours of work means less pay for the employed ones.
Of the 2.9 million
unemployed, a little more than one million of them cited as reasons for
not looking for work their being “tired/believed no work is available
(607,000)” and “waiting for rehire/job recall (394,000).”
It is clear that even
government figures reflect the pessimism of the country’s labor force with
regard to jobs available in the country. The sheer number of those who are
tired and believe that there is no work available cannot be conveniently
dismissed as mere insolence. The similarly sizable number of those waiting
for rehire or job recall reflects the prevalence of labor
contractualization nationwide. This simply means that workers are slowly
being deprived of benefits that regular ones should be entitled to,
especially security of tenure.
For the 33 million
employed Filipinos, however, having a job does not guarantee that they can
already provide for their family’s needs. This figure includes those
classified as unpaid family workers, mostly in agriculture, and own
account workers. Employment in construction and manufacturing, where most
wage and salary workers are, decreased. Moreover, not all workers receive
the minimum wage. Small factories normally apply for exemption from
implementing the minimum wage.
Even those receiving
the minimum wage still have to make do with low wages amid high cost of
living. In the National Capital Region (NCR), the daily minimum wage
amounts to only P350 ($6.71) while the daily family living wage (family
income necessary to provide for the needs of a family of six) is pegged at
P749 ($14.36).
Given the domestic
labor situation, it comes as no surprise that going abroad becomes a
worker’s primary objective. This is, after all, not an issue of choice but
a situation of force majeure.
The growing number of
documented and undocumented Filipino migrants may be gleaned from the
astronomical increase in remittances of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs)
since Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo became President. Data from the Bangko
Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) show that OFW remittances increased by 77% from
$6.0 billion in 2001 to $10.7 billion in 2005.
Given these figures,
there is cogent reason to be pessimistic about the country’s employment
situation, and one wonders what ever happened to the claim that government
has generated 4.9 million jobs. For those who are poor, this was hardly
felt as they try to survive the daily grind. Beyond the statistics, their
plight serves as proof that the claims of an improved labor situation are
nothing but government propaganda. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.