This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. VI, No. 51, Jan. 28-Feb. 3, 2007
Just as
members of the U.S. Congress are now conducting a review of Bush’s war policy in
Iraq, it may well be timely to include a review of the U.S. armed intervention
in the Philippines where the support for the Philippine military operations has
promoted gross and systematic violations of human rights. BY
BOBBY TUAZON The Philippine press is
being taken for a ride by the PR handlers of both the Arroyo and U.S.
governments. For the past several days, there has been media hype about the
so-called exploits of the Philippine military in southern Mindanao regarding the
“neutralization” of Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) leaders Jainal Antel Sali (a.k.a. Abu
Sulaiman) and chieftain Khadafy Janjalani.[1]
Subsequently, President
Gloria M. Arroyo’s defense officials played up U.S. military assistance in terms
of intelligence, surveillance and training that led to the successful
operations. However, they tried to downplay other reports that it was a
million-dollar bounty that led to the killing of Sulaiman. The military operations
also led to the unannounced visits in southern Philippines of FBI and CIA agents
apparently to follow up leads regarding the reported presence of members of the
Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) in Jolo one of whom, Dulmatin, a suspected Indonesian
“bomber,” was reportedly wounded in a clash with Filipino soldiers last week. JI
has links with Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaida, according to U.S. intelligence. Providing some clue to the
air of mystery in this buildup is the visit in the country of U.S. President
Bush’s confidante, Karen Hughes, undersecretary for public diplomacy and public
affairs. Hughes’ job is to sell U.S. foreign policy abroad specifically Bush’s
“war on terrorism” and blunt any negative publicity that may jeopardize the war
efforts in Iraq. Her well-publicized mission last week came at a time when her
own president is facing resistance in the U.S. Congress over his plan to deploy
21,000 more troops to Iraq, which is presently under occupation by 300,000
American forces aside from thousands other troops sent by U.S. coalition
partners. Bush’s ambiguous military
plan in Iraq led to the defeat of the Republican Party in the U.S. November
elections and the new Democratic majority in both houses of the U.S. Congress
has pledged to review the Iraq war strategy. A number of key Democrats have
called for the withdrawal of U.S. troops. Since the March 2003
invasion of Iraq, more than 600,000 Iraqi civilians have been lost. To the
American public, however, more devastating has been the death of more than 3,000
U.S. soldiers amid no tangible signs of victory. Bush’s job approval rating,
which peaked at 90 percent in the wake of 9/11, has slipped to 30 percent with
66 percent of Americans opposed to sending more troops. Jan. 27 march On Jan. 27, tens of
thousands of Americans from 30 states led by the United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ)
along with anti-war U.S. soldiers who have served in Iraq will march to
Washington, DC against the war on terrorism. The march is being organized to put
pressure on the Democrat-dominated Congress to end the war that, many Americans
now believe, began with lies and is both illegal and immoral. They will ask
Congress to “Bring All the Troops Home Now!” Hughes is expected to
drumbeat in America the U.S.-assisted Philippine military “feats” against the
ASG in an effort to dampen Bush’s negative rating attributed to the Iraq
quagmire. The Philippine “success story” will be used to secure decisive votes
in the U.S. Congress that would endorse Bush’s proposal to send additional
troops to Iraq and, if that fails, to use it just the same to justify the
increase of troops with or without the votes of the Congress. The Abu Sayyaf, however,
should be treated as an entirely different case. More deserving of congressional
scrutiny is how U.S. military aid is being used to commit war crimes in the
Philippines. The ASG was founded by
remnants of the Islamist mujahadeen, bankrolled and manipulated by the CIA, the
Pakistani intelligence ISI, and elements of Saudi Arabia’s wealthy elite during
the jihad against the Soviet Union in the 1980s.[2]
Philippine Sen. Aquilino Pimentel, Jr. called Abu Sayyaf a “CIA monster.” John
Cooley, author of Unholy Wars, says the Abu Sayyaf was the last of the seven
Afghan guerrilla groups to be organized late in the war in Afghanistan in 1986
or three years before the Soviets withdrew. Months before 9/11, the
Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) had boasted of having “neutralized” the
ASG, reduced to an insignificant few. Just the same, Mrs. Arroyo’s support for
Bush’s “war against terrorism” led to the proclamation of the Philippines and
the rest of Southeast Asia as the war’s “second front” thus paving the way for
the entry into the country of thousands of U.S. forces in the guise of war
exercises and training support for the Philippine military actions against the
ASG. U.S.-assisted military operations against the ASG have resulted in the
killing of scores of Muslim civilians, massacres, several incidents of torture
and the displacement of tens of thousands of communities. All these could
constitute, under international law, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Center of military
partnership The center of this close
Arroyo-Bush military partnership, however, is the total war against the armed
Left which, reports say, has included the “neutralization” of its “vulnerable”
infrastructure of support – alleged to be communist “front organizations.” The
internal security plan, Operation Plan Bantay Laya, now on its second phase, has
led to the political assassination of 824 activists and the enforced
disappearance of more than a hundred other individuals. The Arroyo
administration’s counter-insurgency campaign has been boosted by increased U.S.
military aid, amounting to some $300 million, special operations trainings and
other types of support. Just as members of the U.S.
Congress are now conducting a review of Bush’s war policy in Iraq, it may well
be timely to include a review of the U.S. armed intervention in the Philippines
where the support for the Philippine military operations has promoted gross and
systematic violations of human rights. The U.S. Congress can start its inquiry
by reviewing the recent report of the U.S. Government Accountability Office
(GAO). Citing the U.S. State Department’s 2004 Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices, the GAO confirmed that elements of the Philippine government’s
security forces “were responsible for arbitrary, unlawful and, in some cases,
extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and torture, and arbitrary arrest and
detention.” The Bush administration may be asked to answer for violating U.S.
laws that restrict the provision of military aid to foreign governments whose
security forces are found to have committed gross violations of human rights.
Various lawyers groups in
the U.S. have earlier called on the U.S. Congress to conduct an investigation of
the alleged use of military funds from Washington by its local counterpart for
political repression in the Philippines. In June last year, the National Lawyers
Guild, Center for Constitutional Rights and the International Association of
Democratic Lawyers, also called for a probe into “the use of U.S. funding for
Philippine military operations against the legal Left that are being conducted
under the guise of the war on terror.” Similar calls were also
issued by Church institutions and human rights watchdogs based in the U.S.
Bulatlat
[1] A DNA
test by the Federal Bureau of Investigation confirmed that a body dug up in
Patikul, Sulu last December was that of Janjalani, who was reportedly killed
in an encounter with Philippine Marines in September last year.
[2] The
CIA, in cooperation with the Pakistani intelligence ISI, trained some 40,000
Muslim recruits from all over the world including southern Philippines for
the guerrilla war against Soviet occupation forces in Afghanistan. © 2007 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
U.S. Congress Should Probe into Military Aid to Arroyo Gov’t
Bulatlat
Since the early 1990s, the ASG which by then had gone back to Mindanao, has been
involved chiefly in criminal operations while maintaining liaisons with both
military and local officials. Just as the U.S. has inflated the al-Qaeda, the
U.S. and Philippine officials are playing up the Abu Sayyaf "monster" and its
alleged connection to al-Qaeda to justify a bigger U.S. military assistance
program and bigger operations in the Asia Pacific region.