This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. VII, No. 1, Feb. 4-10, 2007
In Honor of Ernesto ‘Popoy’ Valencia We
hope that our testimony in honor of Popoy can help to define the legacy that he
has bequeathed to his people. He had a tender soul and was troubled by the
unkind world that he lived in but he sought to understand it and welcomed the
revolutionary efforts to change it. BY
JOSE MARIA SISON
I wish to express
sincerest condolences to the family of Ernesto “Popoy” Valencia and join his
comrades and friends in honoring him for his achievements as a patriotic,
anti-imperialist and democratic journalist, economist, teacher and activist. His
best works inspire us to fight for the national and democratic rights and
interests of the Filipino people.
I have always been
deeply grateful to him for having published Philippine Crisis and Revolution
(the original title of Philippine Society and Revolution) in 1970 when he was
editor-in-chief of the Philippine Collegian. He made the work available to the
thousands of students at a time they were in social ferment and were in urgent
need of revolutionary enlightenment and direction.
I have admired
Popoy for making the Philippine Collegian and the College Editors Guild of the
Philippines (CEGP) as major instruments of the student movement in the First
Quarter Storm of 1970 and the general upsurge of the mass movement from 1970
onward. He did everything he could to help educate and activate his generation
along the general line of the Filipino people’s struggle for national liberation
and democracy.
I came to know
much about Popoy throughout the 1970s through his fellow members of Samahang
Demokratiko ng Kabataan (SDK or Democratic Youth Association) who became my
comrades in the revolutionary underground. They spoke highly of him. They were
grateful for the support that he extended to them.
He was elated by
the revolutionary work of his friends and he deeply grieved the martyrdom of
those close to him.
In the early
1980s, while I was still under military detention, I was happy to read the
research article of an accomplished economist like Popoy, showing the extent of
landlordism and proving that the Philippine economy was still semi-feudal. I
considered his article important because it served to counter the false notion
that the foreign loan-dependent big comprador economic program of the Marcos
fascist regime had turned the Philippines into a highly urbanized and industrial
capitalist country.
He published his
article before Julie and I could finish our own joint work on the Philippine
mode of production against the attempts to mislead people about the character of
the Philippine economy and to undermine the political line of
national-democratic revolution against foreign monopoly capitalism, domestic
feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism.
Because of his
firm anti-imperialist and anti-feudal stand and his clear understanding of the
Philippine economy, the Working Committee on Social and Economic Reforms of the
Negotiating Panel of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines invited
Popoy to be a consultant. He readily agreed and contributed greatly to the
outlining and initial writing of the NDFP Draft Comprehensive Agreement on
Social and Economic Reforms.
We hope that our
testimony in honor of Popoy can help to define the legacy that he has bequeathed
to his people. He had a tender soul and was troubled by the unkind world that he
lived in but he sought to understand it and welcomed the revolutionary efforts
to change it. Posted by Bulatlat © 2007 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Posted by Bulatlat