Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts

Volume 2, Number 11              April 21 - 27,  2002           Quezon City, Philippines







Join the Bulatlat.com mailing list!

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Analysis:
The Myth of ‘Holiday Economics’

Bulatlat.com presents new computations on purchasing power and cost of living based on the March 2002 consumer price index and analyzes the Arroyo administration’s thrust to increase consumer spending through its so-called “holiday economics.”

By DANILO ARAÑA ARAO
Bulatlat.com

A lukewarm response from workers. That was all the Arroyo administration got when it introduced the scheme to prolong weekends this summer.

Under Administrative Order No. 32, there is currently an optional four-day workweek in government offices. Malacañang has also declared dayoffs either on a Monday or Friday whenever a nonworking holiday falls between Tuesday and Thursday.

The government claimed that this is a way to promote domestic tourism during summer which would hopefully result in increased consumer spending. Since the order only applies to government employees, Malacañang encouraged the private sector to also follow suit.

Analyzing the low wages and high cost of living, however, leads one to ask if poor families during prolonged weekends think of visiting tourist sites or finding more ways to survive. After all, the perennial problem of low wages amidst high cost of living still persists.

As of March 2002, Bulatlat.com pegs the daily cost of living for a family of six in Metro Manila at P528.75. On the other hand, families living outside Metro Manila need P394.91 (agriculture) and P415.49 (non-agriculture) per day to meet food and nonfood requirements.

These figures represent a 34% to 36% increase from the daily cost of living in 1997.  (See Table 1)

Table 1
Daily Cost of Living for a Family of Six
(as of March)

 

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Philippines

322.00

349.31

379.51

392.38

418.65

433.88

Metro Manila

387.61

420.93

452.05

466.51

502.98

528.75

Areas outside Metro Manila

   Agriculture

294.50

319.30

348.68

360.48

383.35

394.91

   Non-agriculture

309.85

335.94

366.85

379.26

403.33

415.49

Bulatlat.com computations based on NSO data

Indeed, daily minimum wage rates ranging from P140 (CARAGA region in Mindanao) to P280 (Metro Manila) cannot meet current cost of living requirements. To make things worse, wages have been eroded by as much as 46% due to the low purchasing power.

This means that compared to situation in 1994, the buying power of one peso today is much lower due to increased prices of goods and services. As of March 2002, one peso in Metro Manila is worth 59 centavos in real terms, while one peso in areas outside Metro Manila is worth only 61 centavos.

Computed in terms of the daily minimum wage rates, there now exists a wage erosion of 39% nationwide. (See Table 2)

Table 2
Nominal and Real Value of Wages (non-agriculture)
as of March 2002

 

Nominal
Value

PPP

Real
Value

Wage
Erosion (%)

Philippines

229.92

0.6053

139.17

39%

Metro Manila

280.00

0.5945

166.46

41%

Areas outside Metro Manila

179.83

0.6098

109.66

39%

 

 

 

 

 

CAR

185.00

0.6418

118.73

36%

Region I (Ilocos)

190.00

0.6207

117.93

38%

Region II (Cagayan Valley)

180.00

0.6242

112.36

38%

Region III (Central Luzon)

208.50

0.6238

130.06

38%

Region IV (Southern Tagalog)

217.00

0.5952

129.16

40%

Region V (Bicol)

182.00

0.5711

103.94

43%

Region VI (Western Visayas)

170.00

0.6418

109.11

36%

Region VII (Central Visayas)

190.00

0.5695

108.21

43%

Region VIII (Eastern Visayas)

177.00

0.5914

104.68

41%

Region IX (Western Mindanao)

165.00

0.6150

101.48

39%

Region X (Northern Mindanao)

180.00

0.6075

109.35

39%

Region XI (Southern Mindanao)

180.00

0.6345

114.21

37%

Region XII (Central Mindanao)

160.00

0.6536

104.58

35%

CARAGA

140.00

0.6270

87.78

37%

ARMM

173.00

0.5400

93.42

46%

Bulatlat.com computation based on DOLE and NSO data
PPP - Purchasing power of the peso; computed using the equation (PPP=1/CPI x 100)

As these figures show, holiday economics remains a myth as the government fails to solve the problem of low wages and high cost of living.

If its objective is to increase consumer spending, government should do two things: (1) provide a substantial wage hike; and (2) institute price controls to ensure that goods and services are affordable to the marginalized sectors of society. But, as many Filipinos would put it, that is just a “punch in the air.” Bulatlat.com


We want to know what you think of this article.