Analysis
Politicization of the AFP
The
problem with the AFP and PNP is not its politicization. The problem is
that it is being used for the wrong ends.
By BENJIE OLIVEROS
Bulatlat
The escape of
Captain Nicanor Faeldon on Dec. 14, and Capt. Nathaniel Rabonza and 1st
Lts. Lawrence San Juan, Sonny Sarmiento and Patricio Bumindang on Jan. 17,
sparked rumors of a brewing coup d’etat. Faeldon and the Oakwood mutineers
have been calling on the Filipino people, including on other men and women
in uniform, to remove President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo from Malacañang.
These incidents
and the persistent question on the legitimacy of the Arroyo administration
compel the latter to conduct regular loyalty checks on the Armed Forces of
the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police (PNP). The Arroyo
administration is insecure regarding the loyalties of soldiers and police
officers in spite repeated assurances from AFP chief of staff Gen.
Generoso Senga and PNP chief Dir. Gen. Arturo Lomibao that the AFP and PNP
are fully in support of the administration.
To
ensure her hold on the military, Macapagal-Arroyo appointed two
controversial generals whose loyalty to her is unquestionable: Rear
Admiral Tirso Danga, military’s intelligence chief during the period the
Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (ISAFP) was
accused of wiretapping the opposition, and Maj. Gen. Gabriel Habacon, who
was mentioned in the “Hello Garci” tapes. The two were appointed
commanding officers of the Southern and Western Commands of the AFP,
respectively. But moves such as these, say military analysts, contribute
to the growing restlessness within the AFP, which is already smarting from
accusations of corruption and assisting Arroyo to cheat in the elections.
The
Arroyo administration is calling on the AFP and PNP members to act like
“professional soldiers” by not interfering in politics and defending the
Constitution and democracy against the “enemies of the state”. The
administration blames the so-called politicization of the AFP for the
constant threats of coup d’etat.
Political and military analysts believe it was former President Marcos who
politicized the AFP and PNP. But they were political even before Marcos.
They were trained to protect the status quo. They suppress the rights of
workers for the benefit of capitalists. They attack the struggling
peasants to preserve the ownership of big landlords, agri-businesses and
multinational corporations. They repress dissent in the name of
anti-subversion and anti-communism.
What
Marcos can be blamed for is that he unleashed the AFP and PNP and gave
them power by declaring martial law. During the dark days of martial law,
the AFP and PNP acted with impunity, without fear of being investigated
and made to account for their acts. It was former President Fidel Ramos,
on the other hand, who started appointing retired military and police
officials to civilian positions.
The
problem with the AFP and PNP is not its politicization. The problem is
that it is being used for the wrong ends. And soldiers and police officers
follow orders without question.
The good
thing about a crisis, as what the country is experiencing now, is that it
awakens people from complacency.
Confusion has seeped in even within the ranks of soldiers and police
officers. Issues of corruption and usurpation of power have reached
intolerable levels. The ventilation and exposé of issues in public make
every citizen, including men and women in uniform, think and question. The
polarization is forcing everyone to take side.
The
chain-of-command is no longer sacrosanct even to the ordinary soldier.
Doubts are raised over orders, which before were followed without
question.
Members
of the military and police must discern who among the contending forces
represent tyranny and who represent democracy; who are fighting for
selfish interests and who are fighting for the common good.
For in
the final analysis, the soldier’s loyalty should be to the Filipino people
and not to any usurper of power. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.