ANALYSIS
Macapagal-Arroyo’s Wage Hike Proposal is `Anti-Poor’
Any wage hike
results in increased purchasing power for workers. However, it can be
anti-poor if it does not take into account the interests of those who
are getting less and benefits those who are getting more. On the other
hand, any mandated increase in the salary of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs)
is done in the name of the almighty dollar.
BY DANILO ARAÑA ARAO
Bulatlat
While the Macapagal-Arroyo
administration opposed the P125 ($2.55) across-the-board increase in the
minimum daily wage of the 12.46-million private sector workers, it is,
however, pushing for the salary increase of 1.5-million government
employees. At the same time, it wants home caregivers abroad to have an
increase in salary from $200 to $400 monthly. How does one make sense of
this contradiction?
Budget Secretary
Rolando Andaya, Jr. last week said President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is
ready to certify as urgent a bill that would “increase the salaries of
about 1.5 million government workers this year.” He also said that P10.3
billion ($210.4 million) is needed for the wage hike bill in 2007.
The entire wage
hike plan that extends up to 2010, however, will require between P90
billion to P100 billion ($1.8 billion to $2.0 billion). Clearly, the
planned salary increase for government employees will be done not only
this year but in the following years until 2010.
This may sound like
welcome news at least for government employees, but the Macapagal-Arroyo
administration is targeting a 10-percent, across-the-board salary
increase for them this year. The increase, therefore, will not be in
absolute figures (for example, the P3,000 or $61.29 monthly increase
being demanded by organized government employees) but according to one’s
basic rate.
Under the Salary
Standardization Law’s (SSL) salary scale which was last revised in July
2001, the lowest-paid government employee covered by SSL has a basic
monthly salary of P5,082 or $103.82 (Salary Grade or SG 1, Step 1).
Government employees whose positions fall under SG 1-1 like utility
workers will only get an additional P508.20 ($10.38) monthly if their
pay were increased by 10 percent.
On the other hand,
the highest-paid government employee covered by SSL is the Philippine
President who gets a monthly salary of P57,750 or $1,179.77 (SG 33). A
10-percent increase will therefore translate to an additional P5,775
($117.98) in the monthly salary of Mrs. Macapagal-Arroyo.
The planned
10-percent salary increase therefore discriminates against those who are
currently getting less and is inherently biased for those belonging to
the higher salary grades. The militant workers’ demand to increase
salaries in absolute terms – P125 ($2.55) in the daily wage of private
sector workers, P3,000 ($61.29) in the monthly salary of government
employees – seeks to remove this discrimination and bias by giving equal
amounts to all workers.
Increase for home caregivers abroad
Meanwhile, the
Philippine Overseas Employment Administration’s (POEA) governing board
increased the minimum salary of departing Filipino home caregivers to
$400. According to news reports, the POEA “also raised the minimum wage
requirement to 25 years old, prohibited the collection of placement fee
and required a prequalification certificate.”
POEA Chair
Rosalinda Baldoz said that through this new policy, Filipino caregivers
would “upgrade their skills and eventually graduate from their grueling
24/7 work week.”
Despite the
Department of Labor and Employment’s (DoLE) projection that the new
policy will result in a 40-percent drop in yearly deployment, Labor
Undersecretary Danilo Cruz said that the new requirements “would bring
in more benefits for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) in the domestic
sector.”
He added that the
drop “could be easily compensated by new markets that need skilled and
professional workers.” Cruz said that new labor markets have opened in
Canada, Libya, Spain and Taiwan, while Australia and New Zealand are “on
the pipeline.”
Analyzing data on
migrant labor, the new policy proves to be a good solution for the
Macapagal-Arroyo administration to ensure a steady increase in OFW
remittances. POEA data showed that in 2006, the number of deployed
workers totaled 1.09 million of which around 300,000 were domestic
helpers.
Given that the
300,000 caregivers currently earn an average of $200 monthly, they
therefore earn a combined total of $60 million monthly. Even assuming a
worst-case scenario that 40 percent of them would be laid off as a
result of the new policy, a $400-monthly salary for the remaining
180,000 caregivers means an accumulated $72 million.
OFW remittances –
amounting to $14 billion in 2006 – are therefore expected to further
increase as more Filipinos strive to become domestic helpers abroad due
to the promise of higher pay.
One can therefore
expect that the male-female ratio of OFWs –59.26 percent, female; 40.74
percent, male – will remain. Women, after all, would prefer to go abroad
as caregivers where they can earn 56 times more than a minimum wage
earner in Metro Manila.
The
institutionalization of labor migration is detrimental to the local
economy since economic growth becomes dependent on revenues from abroad
like OFW remittances and people are wont to go abroad instead of work
for domestic industries.
The Macapagal-Arroyo
administration’s current policies on wage hike show that it does not
have the interest of the rank-and-file in government agencies in mind,
but only the officials who are already getting higher salaries. While
overseas Filipino caregivers can benefit from an increased salary of
$400 monthly, their interests are merely incidental to the overriding
concern of propping up OFW remittances in the years to come. Bulatlat
(Computation of
dollar equivalents is based on a peso-dollar exchange rate of P48.95 per
U.S. dollar.)
Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2007 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.