Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Volume 2, Number 9 April 7 - 13, 2002 Quezon City, Philippines |
Israel's
State Terrorism BY
Lev GrinbergJOHN PILGER Back to Alternative Reader Index What
is the difference between State terrorism and individual terrorist acts? If we
understand this difference we'll understand also the evilness of the US policies
in the Middle East and the forthcoming disasters. When Yassir Arafat was put
under siege in his offices and kept hostage by the Israeli occupation forces, he
was constantly pressed into condemning terror and combatting terrorism. Israel's
State-terrorism is defined by US officials as "self-defense", while
individual suicide bombers are called terrorists. The
only small difference is that Israeli aggression is the direct responsibility of
Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Ben Eliezer, Shimon Peres and Shaul Mofaz, while the
individual terrorist acts are done by individuals in despair, usually against
Arafat's will. One hour after Arafat declared his support of a cease fire and
wished the Jews a Happy Passover feast, a suicide bomber exploded himself in an
hotel in Netanya, killing 22 innocent Jews celebrating Passover. Arafat was
blamed as responsible for this act, and the present IDF offensive has been
justified through this accusation. At
the same time, Sharon's responsibility for Israeli war crimes is being
completely ignored. Who should be arrested for the targeted killing of almost
100 Palestinians? Who will be sent to jail for the killing of more than 120
Palestinian paramedics? Who will be sentenced for the killing of more than 1,200
Palestinians and for the collective punishment of more than 3,000,000 civilians
during the last 18 months? And who will face the International Tribunal for the
illegal settlement of occupied Palestinian Lands, and the disobedience of UN
decisions for more than 35 years? Suicide
bombs killing innocent citizens must be unequivocally condemned; they are
immoral acts, and their perpetrators should be sent to jail. But they cannot be
compared to State terrorism carried out by the Israeli Government. The former
are individual acts of despair of a people that sees no future, vastly ignored
by an unfair and distorted international public opinion. The latter are cold and
"rational" decisions of a State and a military apparatus of
occupation, well equipped, financed and backed by the only superpower in the
world. Yet
in the public debate, State terrorism and individual suicide bombs are not even
considered as comparable cases of terrorism. The State terror and war crimes
perpetrated by the Israeli Government are legitimized as
"self-defense", while Arafat, even under siege, is demanded to arrest
"terrorists." I
want to ask: Who will arrest Sharon, the person directly responsible for the
orders to kill Palestinians? When is he going to be defined a terrorist too? How
long will the world ignore the Palestinian cry that all they want is freedom and
independence? When will it stop neglecting the fact that the goal of the Israeli
Government is not security, but the continued occupation and subjugation of the
Palestinian people? As Israelis in the opposition, we are fighting against our
government, but the international support that Sharon receives is constantly
jeopardizing our struggle. The whole international public opinion must be
reverted, and the UN must deploy intervention forces in order to stop the
bloodshed and the imminent deterioration. Israelis and Palestinians desperately
need the awakening of the international community's public opinion and a
reversal in the global attitude. These are needed both in order to save our
lives (literally), and preserve our hope in a better future. Bulatlat.com *
Dr. Lev Grinberg is a political sociologist, and Director of the Humphrey
Institute for Social Research at Ben Gurion University Back to Alternative Reader Index We want to know what you think of this article.
|