Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Volume 3, Number 23 July 13 - 19, 2003 Quezon City, Philippines |
CultureThe State of Culture and the Arts is the State of the NationWe
cannot depend on the government to promote culture and arts that will liberate
us. How can we when people in
government themselves desire to: change the Constitution to save their own
positions? privatize utility companies instead of maintaining these in the
service of the people? welcome U.S. troops to ridicule our sovereignty? By
the Concerned Artists of the Philippines July
is State of the Nation (SONA) month. Allow
us, artists and cultural workers, to be the first to give an assessment of what
the government did for the culture sector. It is easy. There was none. It
was the executive branch itself that has declared that there is no need for a
department of culture because culture cannot be regulated. Indeed, a revelation
that affirms the perception that bureaucracies exist to “regulate,”—like,
the Department of Labor is there to regulate labor; the Department of
Agriculture to regulate farmers; the Department of Education to regulate what is
to be taught. We would like to
think that these organizations exist in order to promote the interests and
develop the potentials of their specific sectors. Oops,
but there’s the Department of Tourism, with a whooping P1B budget, which is
supposed to promote Philippine culture—unfortunately, to tourists.
Back to base one. So, aside from the largest salad bowl, the longest longaniza,
the biggest shoes, where is our culture coming from? In
the economic scene, the trend is liberalization. And liberalization it is too for cultural products. In films,
local production dove from a high of more that 400 per year in the 1980s to a
low of less than 100 in 2001. Looking
at cinema billboards displaying two local productions out of 10 movies, it is
easy to deduce that year 2002 was no better.
From here, it can also be deduced that what is ailing the industry is not
just piracy. In fact, anti-piracy
drives actually serve giant foreign (mostly American) producers because they
have many more products to protect. And that’s on us, meaning, the protection
of foreign film producers comes from public funds– the people’s money, part
of which comes from the artists’ 10% VAT. Ironic–
we protect those that kill us. It
is common knowledge that, today, more and more people are poor and money (power)
is more and more concentrated on a few. This
concentration of money (power) is also in the realm of culture. A majority and
big time cultural productions are controlled by media conglomerates.
It is a lucrative business after all; incomes of major media networks
show that. But productions require multi-million budgets and shrewd capitalists
would not risk experimentation, much more, encourage the production of profound
stories that examine social problems (because they are much of the problem). At
present, it is apt to say that we cannot depend on the government to promote
culture and arts that will liberate us. How
can we when people in government themselves desire to: change the constitution
to save their own positions? privatize utility companies instead of maintaining
these in the service of the people? welcome U.S. troops to ridicule our
sovereignty? We
will not be surprised if many will say, “Why not?” That is the effect of the kind of arts that dominate in our
society. These are the arts that
promote a culture of conformity. The
culture that says that protest and resistance are automatically acts of
“terrorism.” Given
the situation, some honest artists are just too petrified to produce anything,
not a few sell out, but there are many who resist. There are those who are not
mesmerized by the personal rewards that conformity guarantee. There are artists
and cultural groups who make their art speak for the people; who teach art so
that the people can express themselves through the arts; and, most importantly,
who live the dictum of their art. Something
is terribly wrong with the political and economic order. (We will not be an
impoverished country if it were otherwise.)
Artists and cultural workers have a choice: to just live with it and sink
with it; or be part of the protest and resistance movement toward rebuilding the
nation. The latter is a hard choice
to make. But, for the CONCERNED ARTISTS OF THE PHILIPPINES, it is the right one. Reference: JULIE L. PO, secretary general, CAP We want to know what you think of this article.
|
|