Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts

Volume 3,  Number 31               September 7 - 13, 2003            Quezon City, Philippines


 





Outstanding, insightful, honest coverage...

 

Join the Bulatlat.com mailing list!

Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Culture

Amado V. Hernandez: People’s Writer

Because of the sharp and stirring literary expression of the social causes he pursued, Amado V. Hernandez is rightly considered a prime example of the writer as agent of social change and purveyor of people’s culture.

By Alexander Martin Remollino
Bulatlat.com


I distinctly remember that in one of our college classes in literature, our professor asked the following question: “Should literature be for its own sake, or should it espouse social causes?” As our professor herself would later on explain, the question was a way of asking whether the writer should be concerned with form or with content.

We can be sure that if the late writer Amado V. Hernandez, whose centennial birth anniversary will be celebrated on Sept. 13, were asked that question, he would have answered—without a moment’s hesitation, without batting an eyelash—that writers have a responsibility to involve themselves in society. As he said in his speech when he accepted the 1964 Manila Cultural Award (which is just one of the many awards he received), “The days are gone when the artist was like Narcissus, adoring his own image. Today the artist is witness to and part of the immediate present.”

As his very writings prove, in the manner that one of his literary idols, Jose Rizal, proved decades before him; and another writer, Eman Lacaba, would start to prove while he was still alive—espousing social causes does not have to diminish the aesthetic quality of one’s literary output.

Society as truth

In his essay “The Filipino and the Man,” which he wrote as a college freshman at the Ateneo de Manila University, Eman Lacaba said: “The responsibility of any writer in the world is to write truthfully and comprehensibly about the world he lives in, the world he remembers and continues to know, the world he experiences.”

Hernandez, who was born decades before Lacaba, also knew this. And his prolific and diverse writings attest to his vast knowledge of the reality of human experience.

Hernandez’s grasp of the scope of human reality was so deep that he was well aware that society and social phenomena, like romantic affairs which comprise the greater bulk of subjects in the world’s body of literature, are also parts of human reality. In fact to Hernandez, society and social phenomena play the most prominent parts in the human drama: he knew perfectly well that all human beings are inevitably affected by society since they are all part of it.

Thus, even as he would sometimes write of a woman wooed with orchids, of a lover’s Rip van Winkle heart, he wrote infinitely more of the battle between the oppressor and the oppressed—and because he knew that rectitude can never side with the oppressor, he in his writings showed unequivocal support for the oppressed and undeniable hatred for the oppressor.

Hernandez wrote clearly and eloquently of enslavement in the hands of a colonial power, of workers in unspeakable penury amidst unimaginable abundance, of peasants stripped of their lands, of children begging on the streets, of people eaten by the prisons for refusing to bow before iniquity, of the heroism of fighters for freedom and justice. His poems, articles, novels, short stories, and one-act plays contained such lucid expositions of the social issues of the times in which he lived (issues that are still very much with us), and were so splendidly written, that he became (and still is) an icon for many a succeeding generation of cause-oriented writers.

Among the people

One of Hernandez’s distinguishing marks is the fact that unlike so many politicians who in their campaign speeches tell sob stories of how as boys they had to catch frogs for supper because there was nothing else to eat, he stayed by the side of the people of whom he was born—and served them to his very last breath.

Hernandez was born on Sept. 13, 1903 but it is not quite clear where; the conventional wisdom is that he was born in the slums of Tondo, where he grew up, but a short story by Jun Cruz Reyes implies that his origins can be traced to a town in Bulacan.

He took his pre-college education in public schools in Manila. After high school he began the study of Fine Arts at the University of Santo Tomas, where fellow cause-oriented writers Bien Lumbera and Rogelio Sicat also studied. However, he did not finish his course, and instead settled for a course under the American Correspondence Schools.

Afterwards he entered the worlds of journalism and literature. He would climb the ladder and eventually become editor of Mabuhay in 1934, a post he held until 1941. Even at the earliest days of his career he was already writing against U.S. imperialism and social injustice.

When the Second World War broke out, he refused offers to collaborate with the Japanese. He took to the hills and became an intelligence officer of a guerilla unit.

In 1945, he co-founded the Philippine Newspaper Guild and the Congress of Labor Organizations (CLO). He would become chairman of the CLO. These organizations were in the forefront of struggles not only for press freedom and better economic conditions for workers, but also against U.S. economic domination and military intervention.

Hernandez was arrested in 1951 amidst a crackdown by the Quirino administration on both legal progressive organizations and the underground Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas-Hukbong Mapagpalaya ng Bayan. For five months he was held in solitary confinement, after which he was charged with “rebellion complexed with murder and other crimes.” He was convicted by the lower court and sentenced to imprisonment for five years and six months. In 1956 he won temporary liberty, and after eight more years was acquitted, with the Supreme Court ruling that there is no such crime as rebellion complexed with murder.

After that, he became editor of the progressive newspapers Makabayan and Ang Masa, and continued to write  poetry, fiction, and short drama. He also resumed active participation in the people’s movement.

Aside from his work as writer and activist, he had a brief stint in teaching, and also served four terms as a Manila councilor.

He died of heart attack in March 1970.

The writer as hero

Amado V. Hernandez definitely has a place in the country’s pantheon of heroes, along with Emilio Jacinto, Apolinario Mabini, and Aurelio Tolentino—like whom he was a brilliant writer with unswerving dedication to the fight for freedom and justice. Like  Mabini and Tolentino, he suffered for his refusal to accept a status quo characterized by a rule of a small elite and their foreign masters, but held fast to his convictions to his last breath.

Because of the sharp and stirring literary expression of the social causes he pursued, he is rightly considered a prime example of the writer as agent of social change and purveyor of people’s culture.

He may not be as well-known as he deserves to be, as activist artist Nanding Josef lamented in a recent press conference, but that does not mean he is unworthy of admiration. In fact he is infinitely worthier of admiration than the celebrities whose antics today’s pop culture is heavily drawn from. Bulatlat.com

Back to top


We want to know what you think of this article.