![]() |
|
Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Volume 3, Number 30 August 31 - September 6, 2003 Quezon City, Philippines |
Four
9/11 Moms Battle Bush By
Gail Sheehy
Back
to Alternative Reader Index
In
mid-June, F.B.I. director Robert Mueller III and several senior agents in the
bureau received a group of about 20 visitors in a briefing room of the J. Edgar
Hoover Building in Washington, D.C. The director himself narrated a PowerPoint
presentation that summarized the numbers of agents and leads and evidence he and
his people had collected in the 18-month course of their ongoing investigation
of Penttbom, the clever neologism the bureau had invented to reduce the sites of
devastation on 9/11 to one word: Pent for Pentagon, Pen for Pennsylvania, tt for
the Twin Towers and bom for the four planes that the government had been
forewarned could be used as weapons even bombs but chose to ignore. After
the formal meeting, senior agents in the room faced a grilling by Kristen
Breitweiser, a 9/11 widow whose cohorts are three other widowed moms from New
Jersey. "I
don t understand, with all the warnings about the possibilities of Al Qaeda
using planes as weapons, and the Phoenix Memo from one of your own agents
warning that Osama bin Laden was sending operatives to this country for
flight-school training, why didn t you check out flight schools before Sept.
11?" "Do
you know how many flight schools there are in the U.S.? Thousands," a
senior agent protested. "We couldn't have investigated them all and found
these few guys." "Wait,
you just told me there were too many flight schools and that prohibited you from
investigating them before 9/11," Kristen persisted. "How is it that a
few hours after the attacks, the nation is brought to its knees, and
miraculously F.B.I. agents showed up at Embry-Riddle flight school in Florida
where some of the terrorists trained?" "We
got lucky," was the reply. Kristen
then asked the agent how the F.B.I. had known exactly which A.T.M. in Portland,
Me., would yield a videotape of Mohammed Atta, the leader of the attacks. The
agent got some facts confused, then changed his story. When Kristen wouldn t be
pacified by evasive answers, the senior agent parried, "What are you
getting at?" "I
think you had open investigations before Sept. 11 on some of the people
responsible for the terrorist attacks," she said. "We
did not," the agent said unequivocally. A
month later, on the morning of July 24, before the scathing Congressional report
on intelligence failures was released, Kristen and the three other moms from New
Jersey with whom she'd been in league sat impassively at a briefing by staff
director Eleanor Hill: In fact, they learned, the F.B.I. had open investigations
on 14 individuals who had contact with the hijackers while they were in the
United States. The flush of pride in their own research passed quickly. This was
just another confirmation that the federal government continued to obscure the
facts about its handling of suspected terrorists leading up to the Sept. 11
attacks. So
afraid is the Bush administration of what could be revealed by inquiries into
its failures to protect Americans from terrorist attack, it is unabashedly using
Kremlin tactics to muzzle members of Congress and thwart the current federal
commission investigating the failures of Sept. 11. But there is at least one
force that the administration cannot scare off or shut up. They call themselves
"Just Four Moms from New Jersey," or simply "the girls." Kristen
and the three other housewives who also lost their husbands in the attack on the
World Trade Center started out knowing virtually nothing about how their
government worked. For the last 20 months they have clipped and Googled, rallied
and lobbied, charmed and intimidated top officials all the way to the White
House. In the process, they have made themselves arguably the most effective
force in dancing around the obstacle course by which the administration
continues to block a transparent investigation of what went wrong with the
country's defenses on Sept. 11 and what we should be doing about it. They have
no political clout, no money, no powerful husbands--no husbands at all since
Sept. 11--and they are up against a White House, an Attorney General, a Defense
Secretary, a National Security Advisor and an F.B.I. director who have worked
out an ingenious bait-and-switch game to thwart their efforts and those of any
investigative body. The
Mom Cell The
four moms--Kristen Breitweiser, Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie van
Auken--use tactics more like those of a leaderless cell. They have learned how
to deposit their assorted seven children with select grandmothers before dawn
and rocket down the Garden State Parkway to Washington. They have become experts
at changing out of pedal-pushers and into proper pantsuits while their S.U.V. is
stopped in traffic, so they can hit the Capitol rotunda running. They have
talked strategy with Senator John McCain and Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle.
They once caught Congressman Porter Goss hiding behind his office door to avoid
them. And they maintain an open line of communication with the White House. But
after the razzle-dazzle of their every trip to D.C., the four moms dissolve on
the hot seats of Kristen's S.U.V., balance take-out food containers on their
laps and grow quiet. Each then retreats into a private chamber of longing for
the men whose lifeless images they wear on tags around their necks. After their
first big rally, Patty's soft voice floated a wish that might have been in the
minds of all four moms: "O.K.,
we did the rally, now can our husbands come home?" Last
September, Kristen was singled out by the families of 9/11 to testify in the
first televised public hearing before the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry
(JICI) in Washington. She drew high praise from the leadership, made up of
members from both the House and Senate. But the JICI, as the moms called it, was
mandated to go out of business at the end of 2003, and their questions for the
intelligence agencies were consistently blocked: The Justice Department has
forbidden intelligence officials to be interviewed without "minders"
among their bosses being present, a tactic clearly meant to intimidate
witnesses. When the White House and the intelligence agencies held up the
Congressional report month after month by demanding that much of it remain
classified, the moms rallying cry became "Free the JICI!" They
believed the only hope for getting at the truth would be with an independent
federal commission with a mandate to build on the findings of the Congressional
inquiry and broaden it to include testimony from all the other relevant
agencies. Their fight finally overcame the directive by Vice President Dick
Cheney to Congressman Goss to "keep negotiating" and, in January 2003,
the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States known as the
9/11 Commission met for the first time. It is not only for their peace of mind
that the four moms continue to fight to reveal the truth, but because they
firmly believe that, nearly two years after the attacks, the country is no safer
now than it was on Sept. 11. "O.K.,
there's the House and the Senate which one has the most members?" Lorie
laughed at herself. It was April 2002, seven months after she had lost her
husband, Kenneth. "I must have slept through that civics class." Her
friend Mindy couldn't help her; Mindy hadn't read The New York Times since she
stopped commuting to Manhattan, where she'd worked as a C.P.A. until her
husband, Alan, took over the family support. Both women's husbands had worked as
securities traders for Cantor Fitzgerald until they were incinerated in the
World Trade Center. Mindy
and Lorie had thought themselves exempt from politics, by virtue of the constant
emergency of motherhood. Before Sept. 11, Mindy could have been described as a
stand-in for Samantha on Sex and the City. But these days she felt more like one
of the Golden Girls. Lorie, who was 46 and beautiful when her husband, Kenneth
van Auken, was murdered, has acquired a fierceness in her demeanor. The two
mothers were driving home to East Brunswick after attending a support group for
widows of 9/11. They had been fired up by a veteran survivor of a previous
terrorist attack against Americans, Bob Monetti, president of Families of Pan Am
103/Lockerbie. "You can't sit back and let the government treat you like
shit," he had challenged them. That very night they called up Patty
Casazza, another Cantor Fitzgerald widow, in Colt's Neck. "We have to have
a rally in Washington." Patty,
a sensitive woman who was struggling to find the right balance of prescriptions
to fight off anxiety attacks, groaned, "Oh God, this is huge, and it's
going to be painful." Patty said she would only go along if Kristen was up
for it. Kristen
Breitweiser was only 30 years old when her husband, Ron, a vice president at
Fiduciary Trust, called her one morning to say he was fine, not to worry. He had
seen a huge fireball out his window, but it wasn t his building. She tuned into
the Today show just in time to see the South Tower explode right where she knew
he was sitting on the 94th floor. For months thereafter, finding it impossible
to sleep, Kristen went back to the nightly ritual of her married life: She took
out her husband's toothbrush and slowly, lovingly squeezed the toothpaste onto
it. Then she would sit down on the toilet and wait for him to come home. The
Investigation Kristen
was somewhat better-informed than the others. The tall, blond former surfer girl
had graduated from Seton Hall law school, practiced all of three days, hated it
and elected to be a full-time mom. Her first line of defense against despair at
the shattering of her life dreams was to revert to thinking like a lawyer. Lorie
was the network's designated researcher, since she had in her basement what
looked like a NASA command module; her husband had been an amateur designer.
Kristen had told her to focus on the timeline: Who knew what, when did they know
it, and what did they do about it? Once
Lorie began surfing the Web, she couldn't stop. She found a video of President
Bush's reaction on the morning of Sept. 11. According to the official timeline
provided by his press secretary, the President arrived at an elementary school
in Sarasota, Fla., at 9 a.m. and was told in the hallway of the school that a
plane had crashed into the World Trade Center. This was 14 minutes after the
first attack. The President went into a private room and spoke by phone with his
National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, and glanced at a TV in the room.
"That's some bad pilot," the President said. Bush then proceeded to a
classroom, where he drew up a little stool to listen to second graders read. At
9:04 a.m., his chief of staff, Andrew Card, whispered in his ear that a second
plane had struck the towers. "We are under attack," Mr. Card informed
the President. "Bush's
sunny countenance went grim," said the White House account. "After
Card's whisper, Bush looked distracted and somber but continued to listen to the
second graders read and soon was smiling again. He joked that they read so well,
they must be sixth graders." Lorie
checked the Web site of the Federal Aviation Authority. The F.A.A. and the
Secret Service, which had an open phone connection, both knew at 8:20 a.m. that
two planes had been hijacked in the New York area and had their transponders
turned off. How could they have thought it was an accident when the first plane
slammed into the first tower 26 minutes later? How could the President have
dismissed this as merely an accident by a "bad pilot"? And how, after
he had been specifically told by his chief of staff that "We are under
attack," could the Commander in Chief continue sitting with second graders
and make a joke? Lorie ran the video over and over. "I
couldn't stop watching the President sitting there, listening to second graders,
while my husband was burning in a building," she said. Mindy
pieced together the actions of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. He had been
in his Washington office engaged in his "usual intelligence briefing."
After being informed of the two attacks on the World Trade Center, he proceeded
with his briefing until the third hijacked plane struck the Pentagon. Mindy
relayed the information to Kristen: "Can
you believe this? Two planes hitting the Twin Towers in New York City did not
rise to the level of Rumsfeld's leaving his office and going to the war room to
check out just what the hell went wrong." Mindy sounded scared. "This
is my President. This is my Secretary of Defense. You mean to tell me Rumsfeld
had to get up from his desk and look out his window at the burning Pentagon
before he knew anything was wrong? How can that be?" "It
can't be," said Kristen ominously. Their network being a continuous loop,
Kristen immediately passed on the news to Lorie, who became even more agitated. Lorie
checked out the North American Aerospace Defense Command, whose specific mission
includes a response to any form of an air attack on America. It was created to
provide a defense of critical command-and-control targets. At 8:40 a.m. on 9/11,
the F.A.A. notified NORAD that Flight No. 11 had been hijacked. Three minutes
later, the F.A.A. notified NORAD that Flight No. 175 was also hijacked. By 9:02
a.m., both planes had crashed into the World Trade Center, but there had been no
action by NORAD. Both agencies also knew there were two other hijacked planes in
the air that had been violently diverted from their flight pattern. All other
air traffic had been ordered grounded. NORAD operates out of Andrews Air Force
Base, which is within sight of the Pentagon. Why didn't NORAD scramble planes in
time to intercept the two other hijacked jetliners headed for
command-and-control centers in Washington? Lorie wanted to know. Where was the
leadership? "I
can't look at these timelines anymore," Lorie confessed to Kristen.
"When you pull it apart, it just doesn't reconcile with the official
storyline." She hunched down in her husband's swivel chair and began to
tremble, thinking, There's no way this could be. Somebody is not telling us the
whole story. The
Commission The
9/11 Commission wouldn't have happened without the four moms. At the end of its
first open hearing, held last spring at the U.S. Customs House close to the
construction pit of Ground Zero, former Democratic Congressman Tim Roemer said
as much and praised them and other activist 9/11 families. "At
a time when many Americans don't even take the opportunity to cast a ballot, you
folks went out and made the legislative system work," he said. Jamie
Gorelick, former Deputy Attorney General of the United States, said at the same
hearing, "I m enormously impressed that laypeople with no powers of
subpoena, with no access to insider information of any sort, could put together
a very powerful set of questions and set of facts that are a road map for this
commission. It is really quite striking. Now, what's your secret?" Mindy,
who had given a blistering testimony at that day's hearing, tossed her long
corkscrew curls and replied in a voice more Tallulah than termagant,
"Eighteen months of doing nothing but grieving and connecting the
dots." Eleanor
Hill, the universally respected staff director of the JICI investigation, shares
the moms' point of view. "One
of our biggest concerns is our finding that there were people in this country
assisting these hijackers," she said later in an interview with this
writer. "Since the F.B.I. was in fact investigating all these people as
part of their counterterroism effort, and they knew some of them had ties to Al
Qaeda, then how good was their investigation if they didn't come across the
hijackers?" President
Bush, who was notified in the President's daily briefing on Aug. 6, 2001, that
"a group of [Osama] bin Laden supporters was planning attacks in the United
States with explosives," insisted after the Congressional report was made
public: "My administration has transformed our government to pursue
terrorists and prevent terrorist attacks." Kristen,
Mindy, Patty and Lorie are not impressed. "We
were told that, prior to 9/11, the F.B.I. was only responsible for going in
after the fact to solve a crime and prepare a criminal case," Kristen said.
"Here we are, 22 months after the fact, the F.B.I. has received some
500,000 leads, they have thousands of people in custody, they're seeking the
death penalty for one terrorist, [Zacarias] Moussaoui, but they still haven t
solved the crime and they don t have any of the other people who supported the
hijackers." Ms. Hill echoes their frustration. "Is this support
network for Al Qaeda still in the United States? Are they still operating,
planning the next attack?" Civil
Defense The
hopes of the four moms that the current 9/11 Commission could broaden the
inquiry beyond the intelligence agencies are beginning to fade. As they see it,
the administration is using a streamlined version of the tactics they
successfully employed to stall and suppress much of the startling information in
the JICI report. The gaping hole of 28 pages concerning the Saudi royal family's
financial support for the terrorists of 9/11 was only the tip of the 900-page
iceberg. "We
can t get any information about the Port Authority's evacuation procedures or
the response of the City of New York," complains Kristen. "We're
always told we can't get answers or documents because the F.B.I. is holding them
back as part of an ongoing investigation. But when Director Mueller invited us
back for a follow-up meeting on the very morning before that damning report was
released we were told the F.B.I. isn't pursuing any investigations based on the
information we are blocked from getting. The only thing they are looking at is
the hijackers. And they're all dead." It's
more than a clever Catch-22. Members of the 9/11 Commission are being denied
access even to some of the testimony given to the JICI on which at least two of
its members sat! This
is a stonewalling job of far greater importance than Watergate. This concerns
the refusal of the country's leadership to be held accountable for the failure
to execute its most fundamental responsibility: to protect its citizens against
foreign attack. Critical
information about two of the hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi,
lay dormant within the intelligence community for as long as 18 months, at the
very time when plans for the Sept. 11 attacks were being hatched. The JICI
confirmed that these same two hijackers had numerous contacts with a longtime
F.B.I. counterterrorism informant in California. As the four moms pointed out a
year ago, their names were in the San Diego phone book. What's
more, the F.B.I.'s Minneapolis field office had in custody in August 2001 one
Zacarias Moussaoui, a French national who had enrolled in flight training in
Minnesota and who F.B.I. agents suspected was involved in a hijacking plot. But
nobody at the F.B.I. apparently connected the Moussaoui investigation with
intelligence information on the immediacy of the threat level in the spring and
summer of 2001, or the illegal entry of al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi into the United
States. How
have these lapses been corrected 24 months later? The F.B.I. is seeking the
death penalty for Mr. Moussaoui, and uses the need to protect their case against
him as the rationale for refusing to share any of the information they have
obtained from him. In fact, when Director Mueller tried to use the same excuse
to duck out of testifying before the Joint Committee, the federal judge in the
Moussaoui trial dismissed his argument, and he and his agents were compelled to
testify. "At
some point, you have to do a cost-benefit analysis," says Kristen.
"Which is more important--one fried terrorist, or the safety of the
nation?" Patty was even more blunt in their second meeting with the F.B.I.
brass. "I don't give a rat's ass about Moussaoui," she said. "Why
don t you throw him into Guantánamo and squeeze him for all he's worth, and get
on with finding his cohorts?" The
four moms are demanding that the independent commission hold a completely
transparent investigation, with open hearings and cross-examination. What it
looks like they'll get is an incomplete and sanitized report, if it's released
in time for the commission's deadline next May. Or perhaps another fight over
declassification of the most potent revelations, which will serve to hold up the
report until after the 2004 Presidential election. Some believe that this is the
administration's end game. Kristen sees the handwriting on the wall: "If we have an executive branch that holds sole discretion over what information is released to the public and what is hidden, the public will never get the full story of why there was an utter failure to protect them that day, and who should be held accountable." August
21, 2003 Bulatlat.com We want to know what you think of this article.
|