Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Volume 3, Number 36 October 12 - 18, 2003 Quezon City, Philippines |
Protesting
Against U.S. President George W. Bush is Sanctioned by History, and the Filipino
People's Struggle Against Imperialist Oppression and Exploitation Privileged
speech delivered by Bayan
Muna Rep. Crispin B. Beltran Mr. Speaker,
officials and key leaders of the entire House of Representatives as well as key
national security, police and military agencies in the government are currently
falling all over themselves in preparation for the visit of United States
President George W. Bush this coming Oct. 18. President Bush is the most
powerful man in the entire world, the leader of the undisputed superpower; and
based on the preparations the public is now witnessing, his visit is seen by the
Philippine government as an event of national import. The Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo government is drumbeating this visit as an expression of the
strengthening of the supposed friendship between the U.S. and the Philippines.
Leaders of both countries are wont to say that RP-US relations have come a long
way since it began in 1898 when the U.S. declared a genocidal war against the
Filipino people, killing over 600,000 in the course of the Fil-American war.
Now, the two countries are supposedly allies in the war against terrorism. Mr.Speaker, there
are many similarities and commonalities between these two presidents. They are
both the children of two former presidents. They were both sworn in to the
presidency on Jan. 20, 2001. They both became presidents not through victory in
the polls. Mr. Bush became president through a decision of the United States
Supreme Court. Mrs. Arroyo ascended to the highest office because of People
Power 2 and also on the say-so of the Supreme Court. Both have been hounded by
election-related scandals - Bush was haunted by the contributions made by Enron,
while Mrs. Arroyo is being linked to money laundering charges through the
"Jose Pidal" accounts. But
among the biggest similarities between them, Mr. Speaker, are their die-hard
commitment in pushing the so-called war against terrorism, their perennial
problem of plunging popularity and approval rates in the wake of this die-hard
commitment, and, most crucial at this point, is their intent to remain in power
beyond 2004. This,
then, Mr. Speaker, is where the similarities end. Let us make no mistake Mr.
Speaker, and think that these commonalities are indicative of equality in their
stature, or equality in the power they wield as leaders of governments. This
representative would like to firmly register the position that Mr. Bush' s
upcoming visit is not the sort a friend makes to another. Rather, the nature of
this visit is one a master does to the home of his slave, an emperor surveying
the territories of his empire, and inspecting the lay of the land. President
Bush's arrival in the country exemplifies the strengthening of the unequal,
one-sided and exploitative relations between the Philippines and the U.S. since
1898. But
before this representation delves further into that discourse, Mr. Speaker, it
would be best to give a background on the current leader of the Philippines'
supposed closest ally. Allow this representation to share a short background on
the personal history of the man the House leadership wants sorely to feel
welcome and honored, U.S. President George W. Bush. Bush
Junior is the 43rd president of the United States. He was born on July 6, 1946
to Barbara Pierce Bush and George Herbert Walker Bush. Bush Sr. accumulated the
bulk of his wealth by mining oil in Texas. He then used his economic power to
build political power and enter the system of governance. He eventually became
the 41st president of the U.S. As
for Bush Jr, it was earlier determined that he was not made of the stuff that
makes academic achievers. As his own teachers would testify, Bush Jr's
intellectual powers were limited, but on the influence of his surname, Bush was
able to get into Yale University and get his bachelor's degree in 1968. As the
joke goes, he finished in the top 80% of his class. After
Yale, Bush joined the Texas Air National Guard. He became a 2nd lieutenant, but
again, as his instructors would point out, it wasn't because he possessed any
extraordinary flying ability but because of his influential surname. After
getting his rank, Bush went AWOL for more than a year. Closing
that phase in his life, Bush entered Harvard University to get his MBA. After
that, he returned to Texas to become a CEO in a company he himself established,
the Bush Exploration Oil and Gas Company. This company lasted 11 years before
going belly up. The failed experience, however, taught Bush that the oil
industry was very important to the U.S. economy, and, more importantly, to
private American corporations seeking to expand their wealth. With
the backing of his father and every ounce of influence his surname could exert,
Bush Jr. was elected governor of Texas. He is the first governor to be elected
in two consecutive terms. It's not surprising because his candidacy was
bankrolled by the biggest oil companies in Texas. Bush
Jr. attracted the attention of the Republican Party. Despite the limits posed by
his intellect, lack of political acumen and experience, the Republicans made him
their standard bearer. He proved to be malleable candidate, apart from
possessing the name of Bush. He also had behind him the strong support of the
giant oil and energy monopolies in the country whose economic interest he
shared. He got for his running mate a former CEO of energy monopoly Halliburton
and a major defense contractor of the U.S. government, Dick Cheney. Mr.
Speaker, it would be interesting to note that Bush Jr. accepted and utilized a
record $190 million in campaign contributions from giant oil and energy
companies. Because of this, it comes as no surprise that he will be forever
beholden to these monopoly business interests because it was through their
financial backing that he was able to reach the White House. This also
strengthens the assertion of millions of anti-war activists that Bush pushed
hard for war against Afghanistan and Iraq because he and his allies in the
monopolies wanted to take control of these countries' oil deposits; that the war
he waged against humanity were wars in the name of oil and profit. When
his biggest campaign contributor, the Enron company, was exposed to have
facilitated the biggest stock market fraud in American history, Bush and his
vice president Cheney washed their hands off the scandal. Let
us now proceed to Mr. Bush's achievements as president. In
the U.S., he cut federal spending on libraries by $39 million, cut $35 million
in funding for doctors to get advanced pediatric training, cut by 50% funding
for research into renewable energy sources, cut funding by 28% for research into
cleaner, more efficient cars and trucks. He also suspended rules that would have
strengthened the government's ability to deny contracts to companies that
violated workplace safety, environmental and other federal laws. Bush
also cut $200 million of work force training for dislocated workers. He repealed
workplace ergonomic rules designed to improve worker health and safety. He cut
$700 million in capital funds for repairs in public housing. He also closed the
White House Office for Women's Health Initiatives and Outreach. Bush also
proposed and imposed a $2 trillion tax cut, of which 43% will go to the
wealthiest 1% of Americans. He signed a bill making it harder for poor and
middle-class Americans to file for bankruptcy, even in the case of daunting
medical bills. Finally, he is also seeking the dismissal of class-action
lawsuits filed in the U.S. against Japan by Asian women forced to work as sex
slaves during WWII. But
beyond the damage he has wrought on the lives of the American poor and working
people, Bush was also able to wreak direct death and destruction in two nations.
He ordered the military attack and take-over of Afghanistan and Iraq. He ignored
and overturned the authority of the United Nations, and single-handedly swept
aside international law. He also holds the record of accumulating the biggest
budget deficits, allocating the biggest fractions of the U.S. budget to
military, and bringing down the standards of living of millions of Americans. As
a result of all this, Bush became the public official most targeted by political
protests in the United States and in other nations. On Feb. 15, 2003, over 15
million citizens of the world came out into the streets to denounce Bush and his
war-mongering against Iraq. Mr.
Speaker, it's only recently that Bush has been exposed to the world as having
used falsified intelligence reports to justify the attacks against Iraq and the
take-over of the once sovereign nation. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
has also admitted that its reports on the supposed weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq were not water-tight and completely credible. Even as this
Representation delivers this speech, not a single weapon of mass destruction has
been unearthed in Iraq. On the other hand, over 400,000 Iraq civilians have been
rendered homeless, arrested by occupying forces, and killed in the attacks and
continuing operations. Given
all this, Mr. Speaker, it becomes very morally unconscionable to welcome such an
official, such a person to the country. The outrage this Representation feels at
the idea of the Philippine government rolling out the red carpet for such an
individual is barely containable. Mr.
Bush is going to spend eight hours in the Philippines, but this is already more
than enough for his government to conduct a loyalty check and secure guarantees
that the Philippines continues to abide by the orders, dictates of the U.S.,
including the program and plan of action regarding the "war against
terrorism" and the complete liberalization of the economy. Mr.
Speaker, allow this Representation to make a few well-thought out predictions.
It's easy to determine the contents of Bush's speech. First he will thank
President Arroyo for her “invaluable support” to the campaign against
terrorism, never mind the escape of the terrorist Fathur Al Ghozi. Then he will
repeat his attempts at flattery, and remind the Philippine government of the
label he granted it - that of being a “major non-NATO ally." Then,
after all the pleasantries and platitudes have been done away with, Mr. Bush
will begin making his government's exactions on the Arroyo administration. On
the matter of the so-called war against terrorism, the U.S. is demanding more
expansive access arrangements for U.S. military forces. This through the Mutual
Logistics Support Agreement (MLSA) and the Balikatan Exercises. The Philippines
is a virtual military base because of the constant and sustained presence of
U.S. troops in the country in the guise of joint exercises. Even before talks of
Bush's arrival to the country were finalized, there have been several confirmed
reports of the entry of U.S. military officials and psy-war experts in areas
such as Panay, Bicol and General Santos. Meantime,
President Bush will also not neglect to thank the Macapagal-Arroyo government
for its quick response to the U.S.' "request" that U.S. troops in the
country be given immunity from criminal prosecution. Upon the U.S.' prodding,
the Arroyo government has not only refused to ratify the country's membership in
the International Criminal Court (ICC), but it has forged an executive agreement
exempting U.S. military personnel from any criminal liability while in the
country. For
its part, the U.S. government through Bush will flaunt the military aid it has
given the Philippines. Mr. Speaker, this so-called military aid has made the
Arroyo administration fluff its own feathers and preen, never mind that in
truth, the aid was in the form of old, much-used equipment. The American
military even has an interesting name for these - Excess Defense Articles. Doubtless,
too, Bush will thank President Arroyo for the support she continues to give to
the U.S. war against the people of Iraq. Despite the widespread local and global
protests against the war, President Arroyo has even sent a motley crew of
"peacekeeping forces" in Iraq. This,
again, favors the U.S. who constantly sees multilateral support for its troops,
and added finances to sustain its occupation of Iraq. President Arroyo believes
that the U.S., in turn, will show its gratitude by providing overseas Filipino
workers with employment in Iraq. After all, the strategic industries in Iraq are
now being controlled by American monopoly firms. In
the economic arena, the U.S. will push for trade arrangements that fell through
in the last World Trade Organization (WTO) ministerial conference in Cancun,
Mexico. Bush will attempt to push on with these arrangements by demanding
bilateral trade agreements. These will entail the increased liberalization of
the economy, liberalization in the areas of finance and ownership rights of
foreign businesses in the Philippines. It's
highly unlikely that new jobs will be created in the wake of Bush's visit. It's
the U.S.' dictate-policy of Liberalization that kills employment in the country.
Already, joblessness rates have registered an all-time high in the last year. If
the U.S. does give anything resembling an “economic package," it's dead
certain that there will not just be strings attached but strong ropes tied to
them. If the U.S. will grant any "trade concessions," for sure they
are concessions that will heavily favor the U.S. The U.S. remains the
Philippines' biggest trading partner, it is where 40% of the country's exports
go. In
the area of politics, hands down, Mr. Speaker, President Arroyo and her
remaining supporters are waiting with bated breath for Bush to declare its
support for President Arroyo's ambitions to remain in power beyond 2004. In the
history of this country, the U.S. has always played a key role in the
determination of who will become president. There's
a big fly in this ointment, however. President Arroyo cannot depend on Bush's
support. It's not a done deal yet. Why, Mr. Speaker? Because Bush himself is
planning to run for a second term next year. It will be to his disadvantage if
he allows himself to be too closely associated with a neocolonial government
that is steeped in corruption scams, political controversies, and military
instability. The
Arroyo administration, doubtless, knows all this. This is then the reason why it
is breaking its back bending over backwards to ensure that Bush's visit will be
a success. Already, the administration has already spent P10 million beautifying
and fortifying security measures of the Ninoy Aquino International airport (NAIA).
Malacañang (the presidential palace) itself is also under renovation, and who
knows how much the administration is shelling out for that. Mr.
Speaker, millions of citizens all over the world - poor and working people,
professionals, academics and religious, denounce the U.S. as the No. 1 terrorist
government in the world. There is strong basis for this, because behind very
bloody, violent and brutal war in the world, the U.S. is behind it. The U.S.
holds the bloodiest war record in the world, and it has added to its list of the
wars it backed or waged this recently introduced century. Under
no circumstances should the almost one million Filipino killed during the Fil-Am
war be forgotten. Neither should the people forget those who were poisoned and
killed by the toxic wastes from the American bases, or those shot when caught
allegedly trespassing the area around the bases. Neither should the leaders of
the Philippines be allowed to ignore and deny the last 100 years of colonial and
neocolonial relations between the two economies that have resulted in the
stunted, mutilated development of the Philippines. Mr.
Speaker, members of this august chamber, the impending visit of Bush all the
more exposes the subservient character, the colonial character of the current
administration. This visit will all the more isolate the swiftly weakening
Arroyo regime. This is also evidenced by the intensifying acts of repression the
government's police and military forces are perpetrating against the people. The
"No permit, no rally" policy has caused shocking police brutality;
execution of youth activists, the most recent being the four Maco activists from
Anakbayan and an SK chairman from Compostela Valley; and the numerous vicious
police attacks on striking workers. Finally,
Mr. Speaker, it should be understood that the protests against Bush are actions
sanctioned by history, enforced by the collective, political will of the
Filipino people as they struggle to free this nation from the shackles of
oppression and exploitation. Bush
as an individual and as a leader of imperialist nation has committed grave
crimes against humanity, and he does not deserve the respect much less the
emulation of this nation's leaders. The crimes he has perpetrated against the
people of the world should not be swept under the rug for the sake of propriety,
hospitality, politeness. The infamous, brutal role of the government he
represents in subjugating other nations in the world should be exposed. So
should be the one-sided, and exploitative relations between the US and the
Philippines. For
the Filipino people, the only alternative to the hopeless, backward and
anti-people economic and political set-up is an independent system of economics
and politics. Now more than ever the nation should forge an independent foreign
policy, unchained, unfettered by the dictates of foreign powers. All this can
only be achieved by ending the unjust relations of slave and master between the
United States and governments it places in power in the Philippines. Mr.
Speaker, beyond the demand of the officers of this august chamber for the
representatives to observe protocol, the challenge for us lawmakers is to take a
stand for national interest and dignity. In
the end, Mr. Speaker, it is the Filipino people who will make all this come to
pass. Thank you very much and good evening. Oct.
6, 2003 We want to know what you think of this article.
|
|