Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Vol. IV, No. 32 September 12-18, 2004 Quezon City, Philippines |
Ex-President’s
Son in Congress Row with Peasant Solon The
son of former President Corazon Cojuangco Aquino last week found himself
in a debate with a peasant congressman to defend Hacienda Luisita, whose
management has been accused by organized farm workers of low pay, illegal
retrenchment, union-busting and militarization. By
Gerry Albert Corpuz
Mariano
said that farm workers in Luisita, which is in Tarlac province some two
hours ride north of Manila, receive P9 a day (U.S.$0.16) for a day’s
work - the lowest if not one of the lowest take home pays ever recorded in
world history. Worse,
hacienda workers are now the object of what the party-list representative
said of the Cojuangcos’ ongoing “illegal, unjust and inhumane
retrenchment.” Mariano
said the P9 net pay of workers, under the Cojuangco family’s Stock
Distribution Option (SDO) violated the P280-a-day minimum wage law. The
congressman, who is also the current chair of Kilusang Magbubukid ng
Pilipinas (KMP or Peasant Movement in the Philippines), blamed the SDO as
the main culprit behind the endless poverty and dispossession of farm
workers in Luisita. The SDO allows big hacienda owners, landed estates and
agricultural corporations to skip land distribution and instead give
shares of stocks to farmer worker beneficiaries of any land reform program
of the national government, he said. The
scheme, as stipulated in the Section 31 of Republic Act 6657 otherwise
known as Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL) of 1988, made farm
workers as stockholders of the corporation representing 30 percent of
Luisita shares of stocks instead of virtual beneficiaries and owners of
the agricultural estate. In addition, the 5,339 farm workers will work
twice a week or 80 days a year, a deliberate move, Mariano said, by the
management to deny work to thousands of farm workers in the Cojuangco
sugar estate. “This
modern-day tale of master-slave relationship is absolutely despicable,
deserves national condemnation and hacienda workers’ roaring rampage of
protest,” Mariano told Congress. “It is a political evil.” In
a separate interview with Bulatlat later, Mariano accused the
hacienda owners of deliberately imposing a “no work, no stocks, no
dividends policy.” The SDO is one anti-peasant scheme that would create
“a minute-after-minute nightmare to over 5,000 farm workers in the
Cojuangco sugar land,” he said. After
his speech, Aquino Jr. rose to question Mariano’s report. He said it is
impossible for farm workers to receive a P9 take home pay adding he has
received no complaint against companies giving their employees wages and
salaries way below the minimum wage prescribed by law. Dismissing
the report, Aquino, Jr. said regardless whether farm workers indicated the
debts they had incurred to which they had authorized the corresponding
deductions to their salaries, the take home pay would not net to P9 as
claimed by Luisita workers. He also said that the last collective
bargaining agreement signed by hacienda workers and the management stated
that 423,000 man-days will be divided among 5,000 farm workers in Luisita
or equivalent to not less than 80 days a year or twice-a week working days
for farm workers. Beginning
of agrarian and labor unrest Mariano,
who had been practically involved in the struggle of Hacienda Luisita farm
workers for nearly two decades, recounted how the peasant uprising and
labor unrest started in the Cojuangcos’ sugar lands. In
1988, he said, the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) issued
Administrative Order No.10, which provided the Guidelines and Procedures
for corporate landowners desiring to avail of the SDO plan. The following
year, the Tarlac Development Corporation (TADECO), created a subsidiary in
the name of Hacienda Luisita to operationalize the SDO in the Cojuangco
estate thereby transferring to the SDO scheme parts of its assets. The
Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) pertaining to SDO was signed on May 11, 1989
by TADECO as the first party represented by its Vice-President Ernesto G.
Teopaco, Don Pedro Cojuangco for Hacienda Luisita Inc. (HLI) as the second
party and the farm worker beneficiaries under CARP as third party. The
MoA states that 33 percent of the outstanding capital stock of the HLI
equivalent to P356 million or 355,531,462 shares of stock will go to the
farm workers at no cost within 30 years. By implication, hacienda’s farm
workers became co-owners of the HLI. But
the day before the signing of MoA on May 11, 1989, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the application of HLI to raise its
authorized capital stock to P400 million where P150 million were
classified as Class A or shares of SDO beneficiaries. This was not however
stipulated in the MoA signed the following day. Mariano
said the deliberate exclusion of the authorized increase in the value of
capital stock was another scheme to maintain the dominance of the
Cojuangco family over the sugar estate and its capital shares representing
ownership of HLI. Illegal
actions Last
year, the Alyansa ng mga Manggagawang Bukid sa Asyenda Luisita (AMBALA-
Alliance of Farm workers in Hacienda Luisita) complained before DAR the
alleged illegal actions taken by the HLI management involving the sale and
conversion of lands to other commercial purposes. Farm workers said 300
hectares were sold to Luisita Industrial Park Corp. for the construction
of an industrial estate. This was done through assigning of parcel of land
to a new subsidiary in exchange for P12 million representing 12 million
shares of stock. Some
500 hectares of land also became object of land use conversion with the
sale of 200 hectares to Luisita Realty Corporation for the construction of
residential enclave About
a week ago, the Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that around 300 farm
workers and seasonal workers in Luisita will be laid off, according to
leaders of AMBALA and the United Luisita Workers Union. A protest had been
conducted but brutally dispersed by Tarlac police and army troops deployed
inside the 10,000 hectare sugar estate. Union officials said 300 workers
would be the first to be retrenched by the HLI management in a series of
illegal termination of hacienda workers. Since
1989, 1,009 farm workers have lost their jobs due to management’s
alleged manipulative schemes and imposition of job displacement against
Luisita workers. Yellow
Army Hacienda
workers also complained of the Yellow Army employed by HLI to harass them
and subject their families to violations of human rights. They said aside
from company security guards, the Yellow Army operates as a private army
of the Cojuangcos to terrorize workers and residents inside the sugar
estate. Mariano
also scored the presence of military and police detachments in four out of
10 barangays (villages) in Hacienda Luisita. The Army’s 69th Infantry
Battalion in Barangays Texas and Pando, the Kabayan police center in Brgy.
Mapalacsiao and a patrol base in Brgy. Cutcut virtually transformed the
sugar estate into a military and police garrison. The
military and police personnel, together with more than 100 members of the
Citizens Armed Forces Geographical Unit (Cafgu), subject workers and
residents to almost daily surveillance, military and police abuse, Mariano
added. Dangerous
place But
Congressman Aquino said Mariano was giving an impression that Hacienda
Luisita was a dangerous place to live in. The Tarlac legislator also
criticized media reports comparing alleged human rights violations in
Luisita to those being committed in Southern Tagalog and the Mindoro
provinces. He said he has yet to hear human rights violations inside the
hacienda itself. Mariano
told Aquino that all military, police and Cafgu personnel should be pulled
out from Luisita to restore peace and order, avoid violations of workers
rights and welfare and allow HLI laborers to assert their rights for land,
higher wages, better compensation and humane working conditions. Retrenchment
ahead of new CBA Meanwhile,
nine union leaders of United Luisita Workers Union were retrenched while
327 farm workers have already received notice of termination, according to
documents obtained by Bulatlat. The termination was done ahead of
the scheduled CBA this month. Leaders
of AMBALA, the alliance of farm workers in Luisita, called the lay-off as
a clear act of union busting to weaken the bargaining position of HLI
workers. But Aquino said the remaining 11 officials at the CBA could still
represent the union so there was nothing to worry about. Regarding
the immediate economic relief asked by the Anakpawis peasant
representative for the terminated farm workers, Aquino said it was not
necessary since the workers would still receive salaries and wages at the
end of the month. “The
Aquino family don’t even recognize these farm workers as co-owners of
Hacienda Luisita and they even treat them like slaves in concentration
camp,” Mariano lamented. “Now it wants them to lose their jobs and
wallop further to the deepest quagmire of poverty.” “Fifteen
years of SDO is 15 years,” Mariano added. “Look what happened to farm
workers in Hacienda Luisita. They are fighting for their survival while
the Cojuangcos are making huge money from their hard labor. It is
politically and socially necessary to change the system of relations in
favor of our farm workers.” Gaining
ground Meanwhile,
House Resolution No. 155, filed by Mariano to investigate the impact of
SDO on land reform, is reportedly gaining ground. The resolution is
co-authored by House Minority Floor Leader Francis Escudero (NPC, First
District, Sorsogon). Danilo Ramos, KMP secretary general, told Bulatlat that aside from Escudero, other congressmen have expressed support to Mariano’s inquiry on SDO including Reps. Benansing Macarambon, Roseller Barinaga and Del de Guzman and party list representatives Crispin Beltran (Anakpawis) and Gabriela Women Party’s (GWP) Liza Maza. Bulatlat We want to know what you think of this article.
|
|||