Arafat, Father of the
Palestinian Cause
By Miguel Angel
Moratinos
The Independent
12 November 2004
Back to Alternative Reader Index
President Arafat is
History. And I do not mean that he belongs to the past because he has
died. Quite the contrary: his tireless efforts over so many years, since
1949, when he founded the Palestinian Students' League and started his
political career, today represent the hope of the Palestinian people.
Quite simply, today the Palestinian State is more on the cards than ever
thanks to Arafat.
Abdel Raouf, born in
1929, the fifth child of a merchant, will be remembered by the
Palestinians as the embodiment of their struggle to achieve nationhood.
Under his other names, Yasser Arafat or Abu Amar, he will also be
remembered for his smiling expression, nearly always good-humoured despite
the hard times he had to live through. With his traditional keffieh -
black and white, as were the first images of conflict in the Middle East,
and chequered, reflecting the geography of his Palestine - and with his
ever-present olive-green military uniform, his figure has become indelibly
established in the public eye and imagination as an indefatigable warrior
who dedicated himself body and soul to his cause.
The fervour he
aroused in his people at difficult, significant moments in his career is
an enduring bastion to the legitimacy of his cause. I knew him very well,
as I did other actors in the tremendous conflict between Palestinians and
Israelis, and from the heart, I acknowledge and bear witness to his brave,
honourable struggle. We shared many, many hours at different stages of the
recent history of Palestine. He was a warm-hearted man, as people tend to
be in those lands, regardless of their nationality or culture. He was also
a good friend to Spain, and our country never failed to reciprocate, as
was recorded for posterity in that historic photograph of the sincere
embrace between Arafat and the then President of the Spanish Government,
Adolfo Suarez, in 1979, during his first visit to Spain. Fifteen years
later, on the occasion of the Prince of Asturias Awards, we showed the
world that our country was steadfast in its commitment to peace between
Palestinians and Israelis by awarding the Prize for International
Cooperation to President Arafat and to Prime Minister Rabin. I recall,
too, that the Rais referred to His Majesty King Juan Carlos I very
affectionately as "the King of Jerusalem".
Shortly before this,
the two leaders had received the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of their
untiring resolve to obtain a just and lasting peace. Both men believed
that Jerusalem was a special, unique city and wanted to make it a centre
for hope and for peaceful co-existence. Both men signed the Oslo Peace
Accords, the foundations of a peace for the brave, as Arafat referred to
it so insistently. It was at the Madrid Peace Conference, in 1991, that
the first great step towards attaining that peace was taken, with the
international community looking on as witness. Even today, many are still
opposed to that groundbreaking leap, which meant, for the first time
abandoning the dynamics of confrontation. The seeds sown by Rabin and
Arafat in those historic agreements are still alive and represent, in the
form of the Road Map, a hope for reconciliation and a lasting peace for
all.
Arafat, who was
democratically elected their President, has been a great leader for his
people. He was tenacious and was entrusted with a clear mandate to defend
the interests of the Palestinian people, which he did valiantly. He was
aware that for the Palestinians to enjoy peace and freedom among
themselves, they must be in a position to freely elect their
representatives and parliamentary deputies, by means of elections
supervised by international observers. Thus, the legitimacy of his actions
was backed up by popular support, as evidenced by democratic election.
Arafat survived many
experiences that most persons will never undergo: decades of exile and
banishment, bombardments, an aeroplane accident that left him with
permanent health problems, missile attacks (one of which we underwent
together, two years ago) and the searing pain of incomprehension and, at
times, isolation. In the last few years, his life was darkened by
confinement within his Mukata headquarters, reduced almost to rubble, but,
nevertheless, he continued fighting to defend his people, inspiring
negotiations and seeking alternative routes towards peace. Fundamentally,
this is his legacy, i.e. negotiation as the way to peace.
Not everything in
Arafat's record was unblemished. He was unable to politically channel
Palestinian frustration after Camp David and to control the second
Intifada. As I personally had the opportunity to point out to him, more
than once, he was unable or unwilling to cast off the cloak of
revolutionary leader in order to rise to the occasion and assume the
institutional solidity of a genuine Head of State. He could also be
criticised for not being firm enough with some persons of his entourage
who were more concerned with their ambitions and personal interests than
with the cause of the Palestinian people.
Arafat's legacy
obliges us to look to the future. He had faith that those who went into
exile but who kept their house keys with them, together with those who
remained in the Palestinian territories, would one day receive, in
compensation for their sacrifices, the rewards of return and freedom. Many
endings are, in fact, the beginnings of something else, and what is really
important is to realise this. Arafat's should enable us to reach peace. We
must move the clock hands forward, overcoming the temptation to look back,
where pain and suffering abounded.
Under the difficult
circumstances that the Palestinian people have endured and, indeed, are
still suffering, some may opt for inertia, alleging their destiny to be
inevitable. Such was not the case of Yasser Arafat. History should judge
him with intelligence and with honesty. In his life, there was no shortage
of action, or of vision or of political courage. Rest in peace, and may
the Palestinian people, based on their unity as a nation, honour him by
achieving a future as an independent State, based on good relations with
its neighbours, mutual respect, peaceful co-existence and co-operation
with Israel.
Bulatlat
Past Alternative Readers
BACK TO TOP ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■ Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified. |