Culture of
Corruption: The Corruption of Culture
Culture is directly linked with politics and economics. Thus, the
problems that beset artists and cultural workers are not isolated from
those of the people—opportunities for work, decent wages, and basic rights
to education and health.
By Concerned
Artists of the
Philippines
Posted by Bulatlat
The arts as expressions of reality and
hope are indeed potent, and the recognition of these as effective agents
for social transformation is apt. However, the arts serve a master; and
whom it serves is with whom the artists and cultural workers stand,
consciously or unconsciously. Thus, it is important for us to carefully
analyze the messages of our works and the purpose of our being.
The policy direction
of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s administration is inscribed in the Medium
Term Philippine Development Plan 2004-2010 (MTPDP 2004-2010). It opens
with a quote from GMA,
“…We must open up economic opportunities,
maintain socio-political stability, and promote good stewardship-- all to
ensure a better quality of life for all our citizens..."
Right off the bat,
the myth that opening up the economy or globalization will ensure a better
quality of life for the citizens is generated. Even before people power
gave GMA the presidency in 2002, “globalization” has been her mantra. The
long wait for the promise of “a better quality of life…" is driving the
people back to reality.
The MTPDP 2004-2010
dedicates Chapter 20 on Culture. However, the administration’s policies
and practices in the sphere of culture are full of contradictions and
deception.
This chapter
emphasized utilizing culture in poverty alleviation. Using a distorted
sense of “creativity,” the government has “reduced” poverty. NSCB data
showed that, in 2003, there were about 23.5 million Filipinos living below
the poverty line, as compared to 25.4million in year 2000. The government
achieved this by changing the “average family size in its computations to
five members from the previous six.”[1]
In text and in
practice, the government’s use of culture in poverty alleviation means
encouraging the generation of jobs or livelihood from cultural tourism and
cultural industries; and partnering with the Dept. of Tourism on programs
particularly in boosting local cultural tourism.[2]
In line with this,
this section goes on to push for supporting “the production of traditional
and contemporary crafts and products such as weaving, pottery, musical
instruments, basketry, music, films, and performing arts…”
Raw materials for
traditional crafts are now endangered because of environment degradation.
This factor is aggravated by the encroachment of private interest groups
on indigenous people’s ancestral lands.
Moreover, opening up
the country to foreign mining firms and militarization in the countryside
are policies that contradict support for the production of traditional
crafts. Not unless the government means “production” in the capitalist
sense whereby the producers or creators are alienated from the end
products.
“Culture” and
“traditional” means that the “products” (tangible or intangible) are part
and parcel of a people’s way of life. It is relevant and, therefore,
meaningful. This is what gives “culture” and the “traditional” its value.
In terms of
contemporary artistic products, the government leaves the sector to fend
for itself, just like the other service oriented sectors of health,
education, and social welfare. Over the past years, the budget for social
services has declined. Directly or indirectly, these agencies are
encouraged to solicit support from the corporate sector.
Corporate support of
the arts and culture sector gives corporations control of these aspects of
society. Artists are made to feel economically insecure and inhibited if
creations are criticisms directed on corporations. Works that promote
values and work ethics that are investor friendly thus become the epitome
of excellence.
GMA’s
Anti-Corruption Drive and Culture
GMA came to power
with the promise of eradicating corruption, as one of the main issues
against her ousted predecessor, Joseph Estrada, was massive corruption.
Before she ended her first term as president, her administration was beset
by corruption scandals. Among these are the over-priced Diosdado
Macapagal Highway, the preferential treatment given to CODE-NGO bonds, and
the “Jose Pidal” controversy.
GMA officially
embarked on a culture-based anti-corruption campaign on May 2004 when she
issued Executive Order (EO) No. 314, which created the Presidential
Commission on Values Formation (PCVF).
The EO is premised on
“the Filipino’s strong desire to see the establishment and
institutionalization of just and moral governance.” It is important to
note that the EO was signed on April 30, 2004, ten days before the
presidential elections. One of GMA’s campaign platforms was a
“corruption-free” Philippines,[3]
and a serious election issue against GMA was the misuse and abuse of
government resources to fund her campaign.
The EO provides that
the PCVF shall be the lead agency “in the establishment of a strong
foundation for moral value formation in the government bureaucracy”
(Section 3). Here’s the hitch—the PCVF shall be supervised and controlled
by the Office of the President (Section 2).
In the MTPDP
2004-2010, after the chapter on Culture is on Anti-Corruption. Consistent
with its policy direction of globalization, the chapter opens with:
“To create jobs, the country has to
attract investments, and to attract investments, it has to focus on
strategic measures to bring in more investments and to make the domestic
environment more globally competitive. To improve the country’s ability
to attract foreign investments means building an effective government
bereft of graft and corruption…” (emphasis by the author)
This is a clear
statement that the foundation of the government’s anti-graft and
corruption drive is to attract investments. We can therefore deduce that
the “just and moral governance” referred to in EO314 is one that
facilitates free trade, not necessarily one that is concerned with the
plight of the people. Likewise, “incorrigible and undesirable government
personnel” are not necessarily the corrupt officials but more so those who
are opposed to the government’s liberalization policies.
The Anti-corruption
chapter further states that, “The culture of corruption in the country
breeds the vicious cycles of poverty and underdevelopment.” To articulate
this hypothesis, on April 2005, GMA issued Presidential Proclamation No.
828 (Declaring a decade (2005-2015) of good governance and good
citizenship to fight corruption and eradicate poverty), whereby the war
against graft and corruption is expected to “result in poverty eradication
by addressing the …losses in terms of undelivered basic services and
programs.”
While it is true that
a considerable amount of public funds is lost due to corruption,
corruption aggravates, but is not the cause of the lack of social
services. To start with, of the P907 billion national budget for 2005,
33% goes directly to debt interest payments and 32% to salaries of
government employees. This leaves very little for development programs
and social services.[4]
Linking corruption with poverty is
deception in the highest degree. Any
anti-corruption campaign by the government will result in merely
superficial (pakitang tao) effects, because it is contradictory to
the nature of existence. With the present system, how political and
economic power is gained and maintained is at the root of corruption.
While in power, they use sophisticated (“cultured”) schemes to rent
seek and/or lobby for MOAs, executive orders, administrative orders or
republic acts which are favorable to their vested interests.
At this point, it will be safe to state
that some government policies and laws are the fruits of corruption. This
is an affirmation of the saying that “not all that is legal is just and
moral.”
Much as it
is ironic for anybody in government to be preaching about graft and
corruption, it is in line with its policy direction of globalization.
At the APEC conference held at Santiago, Chile
on November 2004, the U.S. Press Secretary, issued a fact sheet entitled,
“U.S. Actions at the APEC Leaders' Meeting:
Expanding Trade and Fighting Corruption.” The opening sentence reads:
“Today, President Bush and
other APEC Leaders took action to increase global and Asia-Pacific trade,
promote policies that spur economic growth, and fight corruption.”
The GMA
administration’s anti-corruption initiatives must also be for practical
intents, as the U.S.
government, USAID and the World Bank has announced funding for corruption
mitigation. In short, there’s money in anti-corruption drives!
Nonetheless, corruption
allows the political and economic elites to sell-out and exploit our
country’s human and natural resources. This dynamics make the Filipino
masses the victims of corruption. This should be the reason behind our
persistence in countering corruption.
Thus, our efforts should
extend to actively resist unequal treaties, foreign dictates, the
exploitative political and economic system, or policies and structures
that keep the country underdeveloped. This is the concretization of a
holistic anti-corruption/poverty eradication drive.
The Arts and Culture and
Media
Culture encompasses worldview, habits, attitudes, beliefs and tastes. The
arts are creative expressions of culture which dominate everyday lives and
transmitted from generation to generation. Thus, it is correct to state
that art and culture are potent tools to fight corruption and effective
catalysts for change.
A lot
of creative works (and its messages) are now transmitted through media.
Media’s reach and its power to form concepts of what is good or bad
(values) and what is right or wrong (morality) is obvious. In the same
light, this power makes media an effective merchandizing tool-- to show
and sell products to the market (the general public).
In
recent years, globalization has facilitated the concentration of media
ownership to five conglomerates worldwide. Monopoly of content by
mega-corporations will reinforce corporate values-- money is supreme;
profit is the goal and disabling the competitor is the strategy.
Alarming to note is the final chapter of the MTPDP is the Constitutional
Reform section, whereby the GMA administration plans to push for changes
in the restrictive provisions on national economy and patrimony. One item
beneficiaries of this provision are salivating for is media.
IPR and the Filipino artists
Related to the
technological developments in media is the anti-piracy Optical Media
Bill. This was enacted to ensure the protection of the rights of artists
to their creations versus unlicensed duplication. At first glance, this
seems advantageous to artists. In fact, not a few (artists) laud this
move.
But artists and the
public should view this matter in the wider context of globalization. The
imbalance of trade and opportunities between developed and underdeveloped
countries includes the objective conditions of the global commerce on
cultural products. If Filipino artists concentrate on asserting the
protection of their rights through Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
laws, the credits would actually accrue more on the global media
conglomerates’ books (—because they dominate the market).
Moreover, actors do
not own the “rights” to their audiovisual performances. Hence, the IPR law
will not expropriate the profits garnered from the implementation of this
law to the actors and other creators; but it will collect more profits for
the producers or capitalists.
Anti-piracy policies
without laws that promote and protect local arts and culture will put
artists deeper into the pit.
Challenges
Culture is directly
linked with politics and economics. Thus, the problems that beset artists
and cultural workers are not isolated from those of the
people—opportunities for work, decent wages, and basic rights to education
and health. It is therefore not enough for artists and cultural workers
to just be observers and documentors of reality, facilitators of messages
and preachers of things-to-do. We are a part of society and if,
therefore, we seek change, we should be part of the movement for change.
In particular, our
challenge is to be in the forefront of the movement for nationalist arts;
the arts that are agents for the formation of a liberating and progressive
culture. The correct formula is ensuring that the foundation of our
creativity is in our exchanges, shared moments and solidarity with
struggles of the basic sectors of society.
The arts as
expressions of reality and hope are indeed potent; and the recognition of
these as agents for social transformation is apt. However, the arts and
the culture it generates serve a master; and whom it serves is with whom
the artists and cultural workers work for, consciously or unconsciously.
As activist artists, it is important to carefully analyze the messages of
our works and the purpose of our being so that we will effectively serve
the interests of our master-- the Filipino masses. Posted by Bulatlat
*This paper was presented by the Concerned Artists of the Philippines to
the conference on corruption in culture sponsored by the National Council
on Culture and the Arts on May 23-25, 2005 in Manila.
======================
Yu, Joseph. 2005. To cut the number of poor
Filipinos, government redefines poverty. IBON
Features Vol XI No 14. April 21.
Culture: “Goals, Strategies and Action Plans.” MTPDP 2004-2010.
http://www.news.ops.gov.ph/archives2004/mar19.htm
2005. Stratbase Public Affairs and Research Consultancy Group. Bad
governance, corruption and new taxes. BusinessWorld. Vol. XVIII, No.
199. May 4. Manila.
http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/p/tp-20041124-12.html
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.