Only a Solution Beyond the Political
Will Solve the Crisis of 2005
By the Center for Empowerment in Governance (CENPEG)
Posted by Bulatlat
THE current political
crisis demands a solution. But it would be absurd if the solution were to
replicate the “solution” to the crisis of 2000-2001. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo,
who was then Vice President, was the supposed solution then, but turned
out to be nothing of the sort. Mrs. Arroyo has in fact turned out to be
part of the same Philippine problem specifically that of this country’s
flawed elite leadership.
Filipinos had hoped
then that despite their doubts over Mrs. Arroyo’s capacities and
principles, she would govern not only competently and transparently, but
also with the country’s interests rather than the usual familial, class
and foreign interests in mind. Mrs. Arroyo, it was also hoped, would
abandon traditional politics and nurture the new.
Her failure to
address the most pressing Philippine problems, the runaway corruption that
has characterized her watch, as well as her singular focus on the
elections of 2004, were the key and interconnected issues that created a
situation of constant crisis, and which has led to the present one. The
twin allegations that her husband and son have been taking jueteng
pay-offs in the manner of former President Joseph Estrada, and that Mrs.
Arroyo cheated in the last elections as supposedly proven by the infamous
“Garci tapes” are in truth merely the most recent expressions of the same
From the very first
months of 2001 Mrs. Arroyo’s policies divided the country and dismayed
those who had helped put her in power. Only mass resistance, for example,
prevented her from blocking the plunder charge against Joseph Estrada that
year so she could curry favor with the Estrada camp for the sake of 2004.
Her unconditional support for the so-called “US War on Terror” in the
latter part of the same year was equally premised on improving her chances
of being elected in 2004.
From 2002 to 2003
Mrs. Arroyo worked less at governance and more on assuring her victory in
2004 through, among other means, total subservience to US strategic and
economic interests, and the usual political wheeling and dealing.
Declaring in 2002 that she would not run in 2004, she reversed herself in
2003. She then cobbled together alliances based on nothing more than
self-interest. Using her supposed dedication to governance for cover, she
proceeded to use government funds to further her candidacy. Before this,
however, she appointed the likes of Virgilio Garcillano to the Commission
on Elections in early 2004 to help assure her victory.
canvassing of the votes for Presidential elections, in which millions were
disenfranchised, even as there were widespread allegations of fraud, voter
coercion and military partiality, was a blatant display of majority
tyranny in which questions were merely noted and protests ignored.
The Filipino people
were not blind to these events. Fifty-five (55) percent of them thus
believe that Mrs. Arroyo stole the elections of 2004, even as her obvious
incapacity to address such problems as poverty and unemployment, and
inflation and hunger, drove her approval ratings to an unprecedented -33
The present crisis is
thus only a continuation, albeit a high point, of a crisis that Mrs.
Arroyo’s brand of governance and politics has made inevitable. What is
obvious is that the crisis, though created and fed by the corruption and
incompetence of the Arroyo government and the fraudulent elections over
which it presided in 2004, is the result of a system as bankrupt and as
flawed as its beneficiaries and protectors. The corruption of the
political and electoral system, for example, has made Philippine elections
no more than a farce, even as the centers of power in this country have
been exposed as nothing more than centers of greed and incompetence.
circumstances the solution to the present crisis must be sought
elsewhere—beyond putting Mrs. Arroyo’s vice president, or the Senate
President or the Speaker of House in power should and once Mrs. Arroyo is
ousted. The quest for a solution beyond the parameters of a fatally
flawed political system is the single most critical task facing the
emerging coalition of forces seeking the resignation or removal of Mrs.
Arroyo and her coterie.
The solution could be
a Council of Leaders, or a Provisional Revolutionary Government or any
democratic coalition of forces that would decisively address the urgent
problems of this country by putting in place pro-people policies and
programs of governance. Whatever it is, the one thing it should not be is
a repeat of the same illusory “solution” that we saw applied in 2001, and
which turned out be merely part of the problem.
Policy Study, Publication & Advocacy (PSPA) Program
June 20, 2005
Contact Person: Prof
Luis V. Teodoro
The Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG) is a public
policy center set up shortly before the May 2004 elections to help promote
people empowerment in governance and democratic representation of the
marginalized poor against an elitist and patronage-driven electoral and
political system. It conducts poll watch trainings and voters’ education
in the grassroots and, helps monitor and document cases of fraud during
elections. In December, it published the book, “Subverting the People’s
Will” amidst findings that massive cheatings marred the last elections. It
is undertaking another research on electoral fraud to be published soon.
To pursue its programs in research and education-training, CenPEG taps a
wide pool of political analysts, public policy experts and academic
scholars for their expertise and experience in public governance as well
as in grassroots empowerment.
to Alternative Reader Index
BACK TO TOP ■
© 2004 Bulatlat
■ Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.