Exit from Parliamentary Arena Would Be Victory for Persecutors – Satur
Bayan Muna (People
First) Rep. Satur Ocampo admits that for a while, amid what he describes
as “political persecution” of representatives from progressive party-list
groups, there were those within their ranks who raised questions on
whether it is still worth it to participate in the parliamentary arena.
“If we leave the parliamentary arena, the anti-people leaders in
government will easily have their way,” he told Bulatlat in an
interview.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN
REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
Bayan Muna (People
First) Rep. Satur Ocampo admits that for a while, amid what he describes
as “political persecution” of representatives from progressive party-list
groups, there were those within their ranks who raised questions on
whether it is still worth it to participate in the parliamentary arena.
But those favoring assertion of the right of progressives to participate
in the parliamentary arena won, he told Bulatlat in an interview.
“They were convinced
that giving up this arena would be victory for the persecutors, who want
us out of Congress in the first place,” Ocampo said.
Ocampo is one of five
representatives now known as the Batasan 5. The others are Teddy Casiño
and Joel Virador, also of Bayan Muna; Rafael Mariano of Anakpawis (toiling
masses), and Liza Maza of the Gabriela Women’s Party (GWP).
The Batasan 5 had to
seek the protective custody of the House of Representatives after eluding
attempts to arrest them without warrant at a press conference in Quezon
City on Feb. 25, a day after Arroyo issued Proclamation No. 1017 declaring
a state of national emergency.
The Arroyo government
purportedly issued Proclamation No. 1017 to prevent a coup attempt by
elements of the “extreme Left” and the “extreme Right.” The said
proclamation was issued hours after the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
claimed to have thwarted a mutiny to be led by Brig. Gen. Danilo Lim and
Col. Ariel Querubin of the Philippine Marines.
The issuance of
Proclamation No. 1017 led to the arrests of a number of progressive
leaders and other opposition personalities – including Anakpawis Rep.
Crispin Beltran, who is still in detention. Authorities likewise tried to
arrest the representatives now known as the Batasan 5.
Beltran and alleged
Magdalo officer 1Lt. Lawrence San Juan were charged with rebellion. The
DOJ subsequently filed an amended information that included the Batasan 5
and 49 others in the charges. The amended information cited, among others,
a chain of events beginning from the reestablishment of the Communist
Party of the Philippines (CPP) in 1968 and included the Plaza Miranda
bombing in 1971.
The amended
information was junked by Judge Jenny Lind Delorino, who handled the
rebellion case which was filed at the Makati City Regional Trial Court, on
May 4, and only Beltran and San Juan remain as defendants in the rebellion
case filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
A few days after the
junking of the amended information, the DOJ recalled a standing order to
the Philippine National Police (PNP) to arrest the Batasan 5. This
signaled their exit from the House of Representatives.
Delorino inhibited
herself from the case against Beltran and San Juan on May 10. In her
decision to inhibit, Delorino cited accusations from the DOJ that she
handled the case with partiality, which she denied.
Delorino’s decision
to inhibit herself from handling the rebellion case against Beltran and
San Juan prompted the filing of a new case against the Batasan 5 and the
49 other personalities charged in the amended information, Senior State
Prosecutor Emmanuel Velasco told media on May 12.
On May 12, the
amended information to the case against Beltran and San Juan was filed as
new information, thus making a new case against the Batasan 5 and the 49
others charged together with them.
When asked if the
plight of the Batasan 5 is comparable to the 1946 experience of the
Democratic Alliance (DA), a broad formation of leftist elements and
progressive liberals united on the program of assertion of sovereignty and
advancement of nationalist industrialization, Ocampo said yes.
That year the U.S.
supported moves to unseat from Congress six elected members of the DA.
Staunch opponents of
the Bell Trade Act which granted U.S. corporations equal “rights” with
Filipino businessmen in exploiting the country’s economic resources, the
DA’s representatives constituted a block to a two-thirds vote on the said
bill. With aid from the U.S., President Manuel Roxas and his political
allies filed ouster cases against the DA representatives on spurious
grounds of electoral “terrorism.” They succeeded in unseating the DA
representatives and the Bell Trade Act was able to pass in Congress.
“Our plight and the
DA experience are similar in the sense that like what the Roxas regime did
to the DA representatives, the Arroyo administration is using legal
maneuvers and filing trumped-up charges against us in a bid to prevent us
from performing our duties as elected representatives,” he said.
Before the rebellion
charges were lodged against them, Ocampo said, Bayan Muna and the other
progressive party-list groups had experienced other forms of political
persecution.
In particular, Bayan
Muna – which went into the electoral arena three years ahead of Anakpawis
and GWP – experienced Red-smearing as early as 2001, Casiño told
Bulatlat in an earlier interview.
In 2004, National
Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales came out with what he called an expose
branding six progressive party-list groups – Bayan Muna, Anakpawis, GWP,
Anak ng Bayan (Sons and Daughters of the People) Youth Party, Migrante
Sectoral Party (MSP), and Suara Bangsamoro (Voice of the Moro People) – as
“front organizations” of the clandestine CPP and its armed wing, the New
People’s Army (NPA). A year later, the six party-list groups would appear
among other groups as “enemies of the state” in a powerpoint presentation
of the Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (ISAFP),
titled Knowing the Enemy.
The so-called
“enemies of the state” included such groups as the Catholic Bishops
Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), the United Church of Christ in the
Philippines (UCCP), the Iglesia Filipina Independiente (IFI or the
Philippine Independent Church), the Association of Major Religious
Superiors of the Philippines (AMRSP), the Philippine Educational Theater
Association (PETA), IBON Foundation, the Philippine Center for
Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), and the National Union of Journalists of
the Philippines (NUJP).
And now, they have
the DOJ lodging rebellion charges against them – two cases in a span of
less than three months.
Aside from the
political persecution, members and supporters of the three progressive
party-list groups are being killed with impunity.
Based on the latest
data from the human rights group Karapatan (Alliance for the Advancement
of People’s Rights), there has been a total of 601 political killings
since 2001, the year President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was catapulted to
power through a popular uprising. Of the 601, Karapatan data further show,
257 were confirmed to be affiliated with cause-oriented groups.
Ninety-three of the
victims were Bayan Muna members while 20 were from Anakpawis.
The highest number of
political killings under the Arroyo administration occurred in 2005 with
172 victims. Since 2005, there is at least one political killing every
two days.
“With that there is
always the danger that even we who represent these groups in Congress be
physically eliminated,” Ocampo said. “The only thing that could be
preventing them from annihilating us is the historical reality that when
they hit national figures, the public response is intense, as shown by the
cases of Ninoy Aquino, Ka Lando Olalia and Lean Alejandro.”
Benigno “Ninoy”
Aquino Jr. was a prominent opposition politician who was assassinated on
August 21, 1983 upon his return to the Philippines. He was viewed as the
chief political rival of the late dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos.
Rolando “Ka Lando”
Olalia was the chairperson of Partido ng Bayan (People’s Party), a
left-leaning political party that participated in the 1987 congressional
elections, and chairperson of the Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU or May 1st
Movement). Ka Lando, together with his driver Ka Leonor Alay-ay, was
assassinated on November 13, 1986. Lean Alejandro was the
secretary-general of the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan or New
Patriotic Alliance) at the time he was assassinated on September 19, 1987.
“They are really bent
on getting us out of Congress,” he added.
Even then, he said,
it is worth it to continue participating in the parliamentary arena,
Ocampo said. “In this arena we are able to amplify the concerns of the
mass movement and intensify pressure on the government to hear these,” he
pointed out.
Likewise, Ocampo also
said, there have been a number of laws authored by progressive legislators
that were intended to benefit the common people. He also said there have
been several instances where the progressive legislators were able to
block anti-people provisions in the administration’s legislative agenda,
or at least lessen the impact of these on the people.
“If we
leave the parliamentary arena, the anti-people leaders in government will
easily have their way,” he said. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.