Garci Failed to Resolve Search for Truth, Says Bishop
Even the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is not convinced that
former Election Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano's
testimonies have
finally resolved the search for truth on the issues surrounding the
legitimacy of the Macapagal-Arroyo presidency. Caloocan Bishop Deogracias
Iñiguez, who also chairs the CBCP Commission on Ecumenical Affairs, said
in an interview with Bulatlat that, “There are still a lot of
questions that remain unanswered.” And that the search for truth has to be
brought out in the open.
BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
The
testimonies of former Election Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano have not
been able to finally resolve the search for truth on the issues
surrounding the legitimacy of the Macapagal-Arroyo presidency, a Catholic
bishop said in an interview with Bulatlat.
Catholic bishops Oscar Cruz, Angel Lagdameo, and Ricardo Cardinal
Vidal in prayer at a gathering of the Silent Majority Movement, Jan.
30, right after the issuance of the CBCP pastoral letter |
President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has had to confront questions on the credibility
of her victory in the 2004 elections where she is supposed to have
received a fresh mandate three years after being catapulted to power
through a popular uprising. The surfacing in mid-2005 of recorded copies
of conversations in which a woman with a voice similar to hers is heard
instructing an election official, widely suspected to be Garcillano, to
rig the polls further raised questions regarding her mandate. The
recordings of the conversations have since become known as the “Hello
Garci” tapes.
|
Macapagal-Arroyo
admitted also last year that she had talked to an election official during
the vote-counting period, triggering intensification of calls for her
resignation or removal from office. Garcillano, meanwhile, surfaced late
last year after months of hiding to declare in congressional
investigations that he was not the voice in the tapes and that the
elections were clean.
In spite of
Garcillano’s testimonies, the Jan. 29 pastoral statement of the CBCP still
called for a “relentless” pursuit of the truth, through “structures and
processes mandated by law and our Constitution, such as the Ombudsman, the
Commission on Human Rights, the Sandiganbayan, and Congress itself as well
as other citizens’ groups.”
The pastoral
statement, signed by CBCP chairman Angel Lagdameo, Archbishop of Jaro,
Iloilo,
was released after a series of public appearances and statements by
Garcillano. Does this mean that he failed to contribute to the unearthing
of the truth being sought out?
“There are
still a lot of questions that remain unanswered,” said Caloocan Bishop
Deogracias Iñiguez, chairman of the CBCP Commission on Ecumenical Affairs.
“One of our premises is that we the bishops are trying to reflect on what
we have been hearing.”
“You know
what the impression of the press is on these events, and the people are
saying that this is not yet the end of the story, that there is still
something we must strive to pursue,” Iñiguez said.
Asked what
the CBCP perceived as still missing in the search for truth, Iñiguez said
that what really happened in the election had to be brought out in the
open. “We have to probe that,” he said. “What really happened in the
election, and what was the role of Garcillano and others in that? I am
sure there are many other things that will be found out if we work hard at
getting to the core of the matter.”
“The people
themselves are not satisfied about what we have reached in this search so
far,” Iñiguez added.
A number of
the groups opposed to Macapagal-Arroyo have been calling for another EDSA-type
uprising, like those staged in 1986 and 2001 which toppled former
Presidents Ferdinand Marcos and Joseph Estrada, respectively. What is the
CBCP’s stand on this possibility? Does it perceive an EDSA-type uprising
as counter-constitutional or unconstitutional?
While in an
earlier pastoral statement, released July 10, 2005, the CBCP rejected
alternatives that are “counter-constitutional or unconstitutional,”
Iñiguez said that the statement does not bar cause-oriented groups from
staging protest actions as expression of their participation in the search
for the truth. “That is their own decision based on their understanding
and perception of the national situation,” he said.
“We see
public servants struggling for integrity and the authentic reform of the
corrupted institutions they are part of,” the pastoral statement reads.
“We acknowledge groups of dedicated laity, religious and clergy, NGOs and
various associations, including police and military personnel, giving of
themselves to improve the governance, education, health, housing,
livelihood and environmental conditions of our people. These people,
united by a vision of heroic citizenship, are reasons for hope, even in
the midst of the political crisis we find ourselves in.”
What
characteristics does the CBCP look for in a leader or group of leaders
that would be offered as a replacement for the Macapagal-Arroyo regime for
it to be considered as a credible alternative? “Their words, their
character, and their leadership should be believable,” Iñiguez said. “They
should be persons of integrity.” Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.