HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
Philippines’ Compliance with UN Reporting Tasks Poor,
Says AI
It does not look
good. This was how the Southeast Asia Team of the Nobel Peace
Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International (AI) assessed
the Philippines’ record on reporting obligations to United Nations (UN)
treaty bodies.
BY ALEXANDER MARTIN
REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
It does
not look good. This was how the Southeast Asia Team of the Nobel Peace
Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International (AI) assessed
the Philippines’ record on reporting obligations to United Nations (UN)
treaty bodies.
Ryan
Schlief of the AI Southeast Asia Team based in London made this
observation in an e-mail interview with Bulatlat. Schlief gave
Bulatlat the following figures on the Philippine government’s
compliance with reporting obligations to UN treaty bodies:
Total overdue reports |
5
years overdue |
10
years overdue |
Initial reports |
15 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
The
fulfillment of these reporting obligations is one of the demands
carried by AI’s ongoing global campaign against political killings in
the Philippines, Schlief said.
Aside
from that, Schlief said, the campaign will also try to realize several
of the recommendations made in AI’s recent report,
Philippines: Political Killings,
Human Rights and the Peace Process. Released on Aug. 15,
the report makes the following recommendations: reassertion of respect
for human rights, guaranteeing of the administration of justice,
government with its Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights
and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) with the National
Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP), and the mobilization of
other human rights mechanisms.
“At the
UN, in particular, the Philippines has committed – in presenting its
candidature to the newly established Human Rights Council – to
supporting the UN special procedures at the international level, and to
encourage civil society in the Philippines to utilize
UN human rights mechanisms,”
Schlief added.
“In light
of these commitments, and the fact that the Philippines has already
agreed to visits by the special rapporteurs on poverty and on housing,
AI urges the government to also facilitate visits by special
rapporteurs on issues of particular relevance to the current human
rights situation in the Philippines – in particular the Special
Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, the Special Representative on
Human Rights Defenders and the representatives of the Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention. Such experts play a constructive, positive role
and draw on their experiences from different contexts around the world
to analyse and propose solutions to enhance effective respect for human
rights.”
Karapatan
(Alliance for the Advancement of People’s Rights) has documented a
total of 744 extra-judicial killings during President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s
five years thus far in office – or an average of 149 every year. This
is higher than the average for the 20-year rule of the late strongman
Ferdinand Marcos, for which various human rights groups recorded 1,500
extra-judicial killings all in all or an average of 75 a year.
Of the
victims of extra-judicial killings under the Arroyo administration, at
least 300 are confirmed to have been affiliated with cause-oriented
groups.
“In the
series of AI reports issued about the Philippines over the years, a
common message has come through: a gap exists between the human rights
protection provided for by law and what is actually delivered in
practice,” Schlief said when asked what led AI to take up the issue of
political killings in the Philippines.
“Individuals and organizations, including faith-based communities,
non-governmental organizations, journalists, lawyers, families of the
victims and survivors and many others had been reporting these
political killings,” Schlief added. “AI began to analyse and monitor
these reports and several commonalities came out of the analysis. The
results became the recent campaign and report.”
In the
light of all these, what are AI’s observations on the Philippine
government’s failure to transmit to its Senate for ratification the
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which it signed
on Dec. 28, 2002 – due to pressure from the U.S.?
“The
Prosecutor of the ICC can only initiate an investigation where the
crime has been committed in the territory of a state party to the
Statute or the accused person is a citizen of a state party to the
Statute, unless the Security Council refers a situation to the Court,”
Schlief said. “The reluctance of the Security Council to establish
ad hoc international criminal tribunals suggests that it is not
likely to refer many situations to the Court. Therefore, to a great
extent, the Court’s effectiveness will be measured by how many states
ratify the Statute.”
The AI
recently hogged the headlines after issuing a report on the
extrajudicial executions in the Philippines citing cases where the
Arroyo government’s security forces were involved. The rights
watchdog’s office in the United States (or AI-USA) has also asked
President Bush to pressure Arroyo to stop the killings. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.