ANALYSIS
5 years after 9/11
A State of
Siege, a
Reign of Fear
Today, the number of
political activists and critics killed and missing has surpassed several
times over the number of suspected ASG members killed or captured. The
“war on terror” has given the government an excuse to go after legal
people’s organizations, to suppress legitimate political dissent and
threaten the citizens’ civil and political rights.
BY BOBBY TUAZON
Bulatlat
U.S. troops alight form a ship for the
Balikatan military exercises |
Rather than peace and
security, an escalating state of siege. A war against terrorism that has
mutated into a reign of terror and what is increasingly becoming Asia’s
“killing fields.”
This is what has
befallen the Philippines five years after President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
backed U.S. President George W. Bush, Jr.’s Operation Enduring Freedom
that led to the attack and occupation of Afghanistan and of Iraq a year
later. Arroyo welcomed Bush’s declaring the Philippines as the “second
front” in the U.S.-led global “war on terror” in a bid to wipe out the Abu
Sayyaf, then tagged as having links with Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda which
is alleged to be behind the 9/11 bombings in the U.S.
|
Before 9/11, the
Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) had triumphantly declared that they
had reduced the ASG (or “Bearer of the Sword”) into just 100 hard-core
bandits with a few hundreds of sympathizers mainly concentrated in Basilan,
southern Philippines. The group had by then degenerated into a
kidnap-extortion gang with even a few military and police officials
believed to be coddling them.
But making the
Philippines as the “second front” in the “war on terror” led to the entry
of U.S. troops under the reactivated Balikatan (shoulder-to-shoulder) war
exercises including special operations forces (SOFs) who began to train
the AFP in counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency. The SOFs gave
intelligence, air and combat support to Philippine soldiers who were
running after the defiant and slippery ASG.
Five years later,
after the killing and/or capture of a number of ASG members, the
U.S.-backed AFP remains locked in battles with the remnants of the group
whose number, based on latest reports, remains at 250 with hundreds of
supporters. Police reports – often unverified – continue to fly about ASG
plots to bomb Metro Manila and other cities. Meanwhile, the continuing
siege in Basilan, Sulu and other parts of Mindanao has left unimaginable
scars: hundreds of civilians or suspected ASG supporters killed, hundreds
of others arrested without warrants and the lives of thousands of simple
folks permanently disrupted.
Denounced
Then and today, the
“war on terror” which was launched in the aftermath of the 9/11 bombings,
has been denounced in many countries as nothing but a pretext by the U.S.
to toughen its global supremacy and widen the sphere of the
corporate-driven free trade. It was going to pursue this by redrawing the
map of the Middle East, extending its military presence across the globe
and bringing down states that refuse to toe the geopolitical and
geo-economic objectives of the superpower.
In the Philippines,
Macapagal-Arroyo’s unflinching support to Bush’s armed aggression opened a
close military cooperation that saw the increase in U.S. military aid, the
entry of hundreds and thousands of U.S. troops and military logistics. The
Philippine president also served as the U.S.’ spokesperson in Southeast
Asia for the projection of U.S. military power and interventionism in the
guise of fighting terrorism.
Backed by U.S.
military aid, Macapagal-Arroyo’s counter-insurgency campaign against the
communist-led New People’s Army (NPA) assumed preeminence in the “war on
terror.” Once again, Marxist guerrillas became “terrorists” and, following
intense diplomatic efforts by the Philippine government, the U.S. and
other foreign governments listed their underground infrastructures as
“foreign terrorist organizations.” A year after the “war on terror” in the
Philippines was launched the AFP came up with an internal security plan
that seeks to crush the communist armed struggle in a few years and, to
quote some generals, “neutralize” its “front organizations.”
From that year on,
the counter-insurgency campaign that was renewed by Macapagal-Arroyo in
her first year of presidency began to escalate with reports of
assassinations and abductions of activists reportedly perpetrated by death
squads. To date, the number of victims of extra-judicial killings has
reached 752; 181 others have been declared missing.
The extra-judicial
killings and abductions have triggered worldwide indignation with concerns
expressed by international organizations and a number of governments
criticizing the Macapagal-Arroyo government for its failure to rein in its
armed forces and stop the executions.
Bigger and
systematic
These cases highlight
a bigger and systematic pattern of atrocities that include massacres,
torture, forced evacuation and displacement, illegal arrest and detention,
and other violations constituting crimes against humanity. From January
2001 to June 2005, some 4,207 cases of human rights violations believed to
be committed by Macapagal-Arroyo’s security forces were reported. The
cases affected 232,796 individuals, 24,299 families and 237 communities
throughout the country.
So far, however,
these cases have been denied by government or, at the most, dismissed as a
“necessary collateral damage” in the anti-insurgency campaign, to quote
Justice Secretary Raul Gonzales. Yet evidences and testimonies gathered by
many Philippine and foreign fact-finding missions attest to a policy of
political repression that does not differentiate a civilian – be s/he a
rights worker, peasant, church leader, party-list organizer, student
activist – from an armed combatant. These underline an unwritten policy of
suppressing political dissent or the advocacy of social and economic
reform or the mere articulation of a Macapagal-Arroyo resignation due to
electoral fraud – either by physical elimination or other measures.
The physical
elimination of active critics of the Macapagal-Arroyo administration has
coincided with other measures like the anti-terrorism bill, the
declaration of emergency rule (in February this year) and the calibrated
preemptive response which is a reinvented Marcosian edict against the
freedom of expression and assembly.
Once again, the media
has come under attack with the closure of an oppositionist newspaper and a
radio program early this year. Under Macapagal-Arroyo’s watch, 47
journalists have been slain – more than the number killed under Aquino,
Ramos and Estrada combined. The media killings have made the Philippines
as the most dangerous country for journalists, second to Iraq. Instead of
coming to the rescue of the besieged media, government through National
Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales, recently warned that media is under
surveillance because of “communist infiltration.” A number of media
outlets and personalities have been in fact included in the military’s
“terrorist” hit list.
It is the same
Gonzalez who led, and continues to lead, government’s policy of demonizing
legitimate people’s organizations and political parties as “fronts” of the
underground left and hence, by affiliation, are a fair target of the
state’s national security apparatuses. Gonzalez’s watchlist has apparently
become the military’s hit list.
Those calling for the
impeachment of Macapagal-Arroyo became “destabilizers” or are probably
influenced by the “communist terrorists.” Maj. Gen. Jovito Palparan, who
has earned the notorious title of “butcher” for allegedly having the
biggest number of civilians killed or abducted, has been further promoted
by Macapagal-Arroyo to the National Security Council which he will assume
after retiring on Sept. 11. She had earlier praised the general for his
anti-insurgency record.
Failed in other
aspects
In other ways, the
U.S.-Arroyo “war on terror” and the U.S. military aid that finances it was
supposed to make the AFP in fighting form and united in the fight against
terrorism, yet it has failed in other aspects. It has not been an antidote
to repeated coup attempts nor has it calmed the unrest that continues to
hemorrhage the AFP amid reports of endemic corruption in the top hierarchy
and a commander-in-chief who has questionable constitutional legitimacy.
Some officers who
took part in the July 27, 2003 Oakwood mutiny spoke out to reveal secret
missions inside the military to bomb parts of Mindanao and blame these on
the Abu Sayyaf or other Moro rebels. An alleged CIA operative almost
killed himself when a bomb went off prematurely inside his hotel room in
Davao. He was hastily spirited out of the country. A group of U.S. navymen,
who were supposed to participate in war exercises, is now on trial in a
Philippine court for raping a Filipina.
Today, the number of
political activists and critics killed and missing has surpassed several
times over the number of suspected ASG members killed or captured. The
“war on terror” has given the government an excuse to go after legal
people’s organizations, to suppress legitimate political dissent and
threaten the citizens’ civil and political rights. It has also allowed
Macapagal-Arroyo to stay in power courtesy of continued U.S. and AFP
support.
There’s no end to all
these. After all, according to the Pentagon, the “war on terror” is a
“permanent war.” Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.