LABOR WATCH
In
spite of DoLE order:
Bus Workers’
Back Wages Still Unpaid
After staging two
strikes and signing three memoranda of agreement, the employees of the
Philippine Rabbit Bus Line (PRBL) still have unpaid back wages to collect.
This, in spite of a motion of execution issued by the National Labor
Relations Commission (NLRC), an agency under the the Department of Labor
and Employment (DoLE).
BY ALDWIN QUITASOL
Northern Dispatch
Posted by Bulatlat
BAGUIO CITY — After
staging two strikes and signing three memoranda of agreement, the
employees of the Philippine Rabbit Bus Line (PRBL) still have unpaid back
wages to collect. This, in spite of a motion of execution issued by the
National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), an agency under the Department
of Labor and Employment (DoLE).
Philippine Rabbit bus
workers said the management “deceived” them to sign waivers of quit
claims.
“Once we sign the
quit claim, the company can use it against us to avoid paying our wages,”
a worker who requested anonymity said. “They are really hell-bent on
deceiving us and evading their obligations.”
Members of the
Philippine Rabbit Bus Employees Union (PRBEU) said they filed a complaint
at the National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB), DoLE Region III
office for non-payment of employees’ wages. The workers won the case and
the NCMB elevated it to the NLRC.
The company, in its
third memorandum of agreement with the workers, promised to pay their back
wages since last May and implement the second memorandum of agreement, but
the company did not comply. This prompted the NLRC regional arbiter to
issue a writ of execution ordering the DoLE sheriff to seize four PRBL
buses. The buses will be auctioned and the proceeds will be given to the
workers.
PRBEU staged two
strikes in 2003 and 2004. The first strike, union members said, was due to
non-payment of wages and benefits and non-remittance of Social Security
Service (SSS) monthly contributions. The strike lasted from October to the
first week of December 2003. It ended with the signing of a memorandum of
agreement where the workers and the management agreed that the former be
paid.
The workers staged
the second strike because the company refused to implement the MOA and the
provisions in their Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), union members
further said. The strike lasted from March to October 2004 and ended with
the signing of a second memorandum of agreement.
The company, however
failed to implement the memorandum of agreement and instead continued its
“unfair” labor practices, union members said. Northern Dispatch
/ Posted by Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.