Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Issue No. 35 October 14 - 20, 2001 Quezon City, Philippines |
Bush
and Blair have already lost BY
ROBERT FISK
Back to Bulatlat.com Alternative Reader Index Messrs
Bush and Blair may tell the world they are going to win the "war against
terrorism" but in the Middle East, where Osama bin Laden is acquiring
almost mythic status among Arabs, they have already lost. Whether
it be a Lebanese minister, a Saudi journalist, a Jordanian bank clerk or an
Egyptian resident, the response is always the same: Mr bin Laden's voice,
repeatedly beamed into millions of homes, articulates the demands and grievances
- and fury - of Middle East Muslims who have seen their pro-Western presidents
and kings and princes wriggling out of any serious criticism of the
Anglo-American bombardment of Afghanistan. Viewing
Mr bin Laden's latest video tape, Western nations concentrated (if they listened
at all) on his remarks about the atrocities in the United States. If he
expressed his approval, though denied any personal responsibility, didn't this
mean that he was really behind the mass slaughter of 11 September? Arabs
listened with different ears. They heard a voice which accused the West of
double standards and "arrogance'' towards the Middle East, a voice which
addressed the central issue in the lives of so many Arabs: the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the continuation of Israeli occupation. Now,
as a long-time resident of Cairo put it yesterday, Arabs believe America
"is trying to kill the one man ready to tell the truth''. Arab
civilians, usually uneasy about identifying themselves when their views conflict
with their government, are now speaking more freely about their anger.
"They say their target is bin Laden,'' Samar al-Naji said in Jordan.
"Then they strike at innocent people in Afghanistan who have nothing to do
with terrorism. "They strike Muslims while ignoring the acts of Israel, the
terrorist state which is demolishing Palestinian homes and killing women and
children.'' Mr al-Naji is only a bank clerk, at 29 hardly a seasoned politician. At
the Ain Shams University in Cairo, prayers were performed for the dead of
Afghanistan and in the Nile delta town of Zagazig, students went to the heart of
the problem in all pro-Western Arab regimes. "Our rulers, why are you
silent?'' they chanted. "Have you got orders from America?'' This is
rubbish, of course. Rulers of what we like to call "moderate" Arab
states don't need orders to give their discreet support to the West. And Mr bin
Laden is, after all, calling for their own overthrow. Only
in the freer Arab countries could ministers speak their minds. The Lebanese
information minister, Ghazi Aridi, regards Mr bin Laden's video tape as "a
stroke of intelligence''. There was, he said, "an international incitement
against one person. If he is killed, he will become a symbol and if he survives
he will become a stronger symbol.'' In
the Gulf, feelings are very fragile. "Look, I know old women who are
staying up late at night to say prayers for Mr bin Laden,'' a Saudi journalist
says. "His appearance on television was very good public relations for him,
especially when he talked about Palestine. In public, people don't praise him;
there has been no comment in the mosques. But in private, they are all talking
about him.'' A
Saudi editor, Jamal Kashoggi, insisted that many Saudis were far more critical
of Mr bin Laden - believing that he is defaming Islam - and ready to see a less
pessimistic outcome in Afghanistan. "Kandahar contains supporters of the
monarchy as well as the Taliban,'' he said. "Afghans who were disappointed
by the anti-Russian mujahedin and turned to the Taliban are now disappointed
with the Taliban and may accept a royalist comeback.'' But this, a view that
would most certainly coincide with Saudi Arabia's own royal family, may be a
minority one. In
countries which have been afflicted by a "terrorism'' far greater in
suffering and death than the crimes against humanity in New York and Washington,
the very language used by President Bush has been a cause for great anger. "I'm
sick of hearing about terrorism, terrorism, terrorism,'' a prominent Lebanese
construction manager shouted at me. "When you have enemies, they are
'terrorists' or 'madmen' or 'evildoers'. When we have enemies, we are asked to
compromise with them. You have bin Laden. We have Sharon - who is your friend
and whose hand Mr Bush shakes". Many Lebanese believe that Israel's Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, should be indicted as a war criminal for his role in the Sabra and Chatila Palestinian camps massacre of 1982, in which up to 1,800 civilians - almost half the number of victims slaughtered in America on 11 September - were killed in three days by Israel's Christian militia allies while Israel's army watched from the camp perimeters. Back to Bulatlat.com Alternative Reader Index We want to know what you think of this article.
|