The 80,000 strong fisherfolk alliance predicted that Japanese tuna investors will gain at least P 43 billion ($1,004,907,688 at an exchange rate of $1=P42.79) in total profits in tuna trade, while local tuna producers will face the consequence of losing P 18 B ($420,650,032) in industry profits once JPEPA becomes a treaty.

Pamalakaya said a single 3,000-gross ton Japanese factory ship is capable of harvesting 50,000 metric tons of tuna a year or 150 metric tons of tuna per day. Based on industry standards, a single factory ship could earn as much as $ 32.5 million in gross profits from the sale of skipjack tuna (50,000 metric tons x 65% yield x $1,000 landed price per ton in Japan).

Pamalakaya said the bulk of the profit will come from the remaining 35 percent of the 50,000 metric ton tuna catch, which is $ 210 million ( 50,000 metric tons x 35% x 80% meat yield x 1,000 kgs. x $ 15 per kg).

“A single medium size factory ship thus will earn $242.5 million a year, and since Japan at the very least, employs four factory ships in its regular tuna fishing expedition per country, we expect them to earn a total of $ 970 million or P 43.5 B per year,” the group said.

Pamalakaya said the devastating impact of JPEPA to the local tuna industry include the loss of 100,000 jobs provided by the local tuna fishing companies in South Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, Sarangani, General Santos City and the Davao regions.

At present the local tuna industry yearly produces 400,000 metric tons of tuna, 15 percent of the production goes to domestic market and 85 percent are for exports. The European Union accounts 40 percent of the country’s fresh and canned tuna exports or roughly 64,000 metric tons per year. The rest of the exports are shipped to tuna markets of Japan and the United States.

Pamalakaya said efforts of local tuna producers to upgrade their operations to world class standards will be put to waste once Japanese factory ships invade the country’s tuna rich fishing waters courtesy of the one-sided agreement.

“The gains the Philippine government would derive from JPEPA in the form of taxes and profit sharing would be minimal compared to what Japan will get from this economic pact. The fisheries, particularly the tuna aspect of JPEPA is meant for the survival of Japan’s tuna industry to the detriment of Filipino tuna producers,” the fishers group said.

According to Pamalakaya, the entry of Japanese factory ships to Philippine waters, including the country’s excusive economic zones is guaranteed under JPEPA as provided in Articles 28 and 29, Section 2 of JPEPA which covers the Rules of Origin and the manner by which goods are obtained by any party like hunting, tripping, fishing, gathering, capturing, goods produced on board factory ships, sea-fishing and from the seabed or subsoil.

The group said under Article 88, every kind of asset owned and controlled directly and indirectly by a Japanese investor which includes factory ships and fishing vessels shall be maintained by the investor,as well as the right to operate the same through lease or by any other form of arrangement.

“It may include a situation where a Japanese owned entity will merely secure a fishing contract from the Philippine government,” Pamalakaya said.

The anti-JPEPA group said article 93 of the agreement allows Japanese fishing investors to invest in deep sea fishing and prohibits the Philippine government from requiring Japanese investors to hire Filipino fish workers, stops the government from setting a quota or certain volume for export and from requiring certain percentages of domestic content in products produced.

Under the same article, Japanese owners of factory ships will not be required to source fuels, supplies and raw materials from the Philippines. It also prevents the government from setting conditions for transfer of technology.

Potential funders?

While the No Deal group was having their public launching at the UP Diliman campus, a group of pro-JPEPA business groups led by the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) called a hastily-staged press conference in Makati City to renew their call for the ratification of JPEPA.

Donald Dee, PCCI President said business groups were anticipating the benefits from JPEPA, adding that the cost of not ratifying the treaty and the resulting trade and investment diversification are quite high for the country.

Quoting data from PCCI-backed think tank group Universal Access to Competitiveness and Trade (U-Act), Dee said the JPEPA would translate to increased exports of between $ 988.61 million to $ 1.4 B for the four sectors namely automotive, semiconductor, furniture and garments.

As for job creation, Dee said the U-Act predicts a yearly growth rate of 20 percent, representing the jobs to be created by JPEPA or about 100,000 to 150,000 additional jobs for the same number of workers.

“Are we hearing the potential funders of the 2010 presidential elections?” Pamalakaya’s Hicap asked. (Bulatlat.com)

 Save as PDF