The New York Times Publishes Roadmap for Taliban Talks

The problem with the reconciliation process, officials say, is that it demanded that the Taliban lay down their arms in return for security guarantees, which they did not trust either the government to enforce or the Americans to honor.

BY ROBERT NAIMAN
Truthout/Perspective
INTERNATIONAL
Posted by Bulatlat

If you’re interested in a “way forward” in Afghanistan that’s not built around killing a bunch of innocent people for no reason, then I strongly encourage you to read every word of Carlotta Gall’s report in Wednesday’s New York Times, “As US Weighs Taliban Negotiations, Afghans Are Already Talking.”

Some key points, based on conversations with Afghan officials and Western diplomats in Kabul:

• Far from being “pie in the sky,” discussions with the Taliban leadership are already underway and could be developed into more formal talks with the support of the US. The ongoing talks were actually initiated by an overture from the Taliban: The Taliban leadership council first approached the government about peace talks last year.

• Officials with contacts within the Taliban said the current discussions had been productive.

• The peace process might have made greater progress already if the Afghan government and the US had pushed it more forcefully.

• Afghan parliamentarians involved in the talks said they were waiting for President Karzai to secure guarantees of support for the process from foreign governments – in particular the United States – before they could go further.

• Negotiations should be expanded to a broad spectrum of Taliban leaders; a policy of talking only to “moderates” is doomed to failure; negotiations have to be conducted with broad consultation among the Taliban leadership and through Pashtun tribal leaders and elders.

• As part of the ongoing negotiations, the Taliban are demanding an end to house searches and arrests, and the release of Taliban detainees from Afghan jails and the US detention centers at Guantánamo and Bagram. [Those seem like negotiable demands, don’t you think? It’s not as if they’re insisting that “The official language of Afghanistan will now be Swedish” or “Everyone has to change their underwear three times a day, and they have to wear them on the outside, so we can check.”]

Share This Post