Complaint Filed Against Team of Doctors, Engineer Who Exposed Hazards of Aerial Spraying


In an attempt to derail the campaign to ban the aerial spraying of pesticides in Southern Philippines, a complaint was filed against those who conducted a scientific study commissioned by the Department of Health (DOH) on the impact of aerial spraying in an adjacent banana plantation on the residents’ health.

Dr. Romeo Quijano, a professor at the University of the Philippines Manila and president of the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Philippines, ten other doctors and one engineer were slapped with a complaint of alleged unethical conduct before the regional office of the Professional Regulatory Commission (PRC) by two local officials claiming to represent several residents of Sitio Kamukhaan in the town of Hagonoy, Davao del Sur province.

The DOH study, conducted in 2006, found that 82 percent of respondents from Kamukhaan were indirectly exposed to aerially sprayed pesticides; 52 percent of whom exhibit symptoms of acute pesticide poisoning. It was used as a basis for the DOH to recommend in 2009 a ban on aerial spraying of pesticides. Earlier, the Davao City council passed a resolution to enact the ban, but banana companies led by the Philippine Banana Growers and Exporters Association (PBGEA) opposed this in court, and the matter is now pending with the Supreme Court.

The complainants alleged that the DOH team of doctors did not inform them of the intent of their medical investigations, and disputed that they and their families were adversely affected by pesticides exposure. Specific complaints were also directed against Quijano, who they accused of falsely publishing information that first came out in a Philippine Post report in 2000, and for which Dr. Quijano and his journalist daughter Ilang-Ilang have been sued by Lapanday Agricultural Development Corp (Ladeco). They said both reports “put the people of Camocaan to shame.”

The company has used and continued to use several pesticides (such as Diazinon, Paraquat, Glyphosate, Carbofuran, Chlorothalonil, Mancozeb, etc.) scientifically known to cause adverse effects that have been observed to occur in Kamukhaan. Some pesticides have been classified by international bodies to be “highly hazardous” or have been reported to cause cancer, reproductive disorders, congenital diseases, disorder of the immune system, blood diseases, skin diseases, and other ailments.

“The complaint against Dr. Quijano is a rehash of a dismissed libel suit and a civil case for damages. Now the companies want to destroy the professional life and reputation of Dr. Quijano and the other doctors who were merely fulfilling their moral and social obligations to the community-at-large,” said Sarojeni Rengam, PAN Asia Pacific (PAN AP) executive director.

In his counter-affidavit, Quijano said that since the release of his initial report, the company has stepped up efforts to win over or buy off residents. “[S]everal of the interviewees were summoned by Ladeco and were made to sign statements contradicting their previous statements, which were recorded on video. Some of those summoned reported that they were intimidated by the company, and that the company gave certain favors to obtain the signed affidavits which do not reflect the truth,” he said.

“That banana companies have dared to falsely accuse these health rights defenders of unethical behavior using the very same residents that they have served shows how low and dirty these companies can be at their game,” said Rengam.

In the counter-affidavits of the DOH team led by Doctors Allan Dionisio and composed of Lynn Panganiban, Carissa Dioquino, Nelia Cortes-Maramba, Joselito Pascual, Jose Paciano Reyes, Lurenda Westergaard, Erle Castillo, Nerissa Dando and Engr. Ana Francisco-Rivera, they said that the health assessment was done with the knowledge of all stakeholders and the consent of pre-selected residents. They also pointed out that two of the complainants are minors, putting into question the voluntariness of the execution of their affidavits.

“[T]his is a public issue with far-reaching implications. The shame, if there is at all, belongs somewhere else and not to the people of Camocaan,” the DOH team said.

Dr. Quijano, aside from being president of PAN Philippines and a member of PAN AP’s steering council, is also the former co-chair of International POPs Elimination Network, Bureau member of the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development and Standing Committee member of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety. He is an admired and well-respected member of the international scientific community and was a recipient of the Jennifer Altman Award for Science and Public Interest.

His co-respondents in the PRC complaint are also well-esteemed in the Philippine scientific community. For example, Dr. Maramba is Professor Emeritus of the UP Manila and a multi-awarded medical doctor and scientist both at the national and international levels. Dr. Panganiban is the head of the National Poison Information and Management Center; Dr. Dioquino is the president of the Philippine Society of Clinical and Occupational Toxicology; and Dr. Dionisio is a professor at the UP Manila College of Medicine.

“Dr. Quijano and a community organizer in Kamukhaan have in fact received death threats. Despite these, they have not been deterred from initiating or participating in public awareness activities, lobbying, and campaigning for a ban on aerial spraying, together with local people’s organizations and non-government environmental organizations,” said Rengam.

PAN AP reiterates that the ban on aerial spraying of pesticides is the most just and rightful response of the Philippine government to the protracted suffering of affected communities, of which Kamukhaan is only one example. Aerial spraying of pesticides is totally banned in Denmark, Estonia, Slovenia, and are partially banned in Italy, Cyprus, Austria and Belgium. The call to ban aerial spraying is a worldwide trend, with calls resonating in the US, Canada, New Zealand, India, and some countries in Europe. PAN AP is in the forefront of this campaign as well. (Ronalyn V. Olea /

Share This Post

3 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. · Edit

    i am presently working in a company using intellicare card for hmo.
    i was admitted in marian hospital in tagapo sta. rosa, lag. chief comlaint – uti. i used my company health card (intellicare) upon admission. i was admitted this may 2,2012 and was discharged this may 4,2012. before i was discharged,intellicare said that they wont cover my admission because of my final diagnosis (nephrolithiasis) which is not covered by the company. my doctor (dr. marquez) said that it’s still not clear if i have kidney stones but intellicare rejected my case because of that. i was forced to use my husband’s card (maxicare) for which i was also his dependent.maxicare said that there will be 30% incremental for lab and room upgrade. which is unfair because i thought that it will be fully covered by intellicare. when the final bill arrived hospital gross charge is P34,202.16. i needed to pay P5,100.00 which is a part of the 30% increment. my final diagnosis in the hospital’s bill is just uti(URINARY TRACT INFECTION). i found out that i was also overcharged – i was charged P6,435.00 for full abdomen ultrasound, when what they are normally charging is P4,800.00 for hmo. i was overcharged by that hospital P34,000.00+ is too much for uti. I HOPE YOU CAN HELP ME

  2. where are the sick people who are said to be seriously ill by the researchers?
    why were they not immediately endorsed for treatment by the concerned doctors 4 years ago?

    Why are they kept ignorant of their illness, municipal health officer does not know who they are.

Comments are closed.