Witness Wilfred Ramos said Staff Sgt. Edgardo Osorio was the one who hogtied him and his father the day the two students and Merino were taken by some 20 armed men.
By RONALYN V. OLEA
MANILA – Finally, the mysterious soldier who has been implicated by a witness in the abduction of the two University of the Philippines (UP) students has been named.
In today’s hearing, Provost Marshal Col. Herbert Yambing submitted to the Department of Justice (DOJ) panel the personal circumstances and assignments of Staff Sgt. Edgardo Osorio, one of the security escorts of retired Maj. Gen. Jovito Palparan Jr.
Osorio, who attended the hearing on July 19, was identified by Wilfred Ramos, one of the witnesses, as one of those who abducted Karen Empeño, Sherlyn Cadapan and Manuel Merino on June 26, 2006. In his supplemental affidavit, Ramos said the then unidentified soldier was the one who hogtied him and his father the day the two students and Merino were taken by some 20 armed men.
Erlinda Capadan and Concepcion Empeño, mothers of the two missing students, filed their amended complaint, naming Osorio as one of the accused in the criminal complaint they filed against Palparan and several other military officials.
Osorio is now assigned at the 24th Intelligence Service Unit of the Philippine Army based in Fort Bonifacio. He entered the Armed Forces of the Philippines in February 1987.
Edre Olalia, one of the lawyers for the complainants, accepted the documents provided by Yambing but manifested that they are not admitting the veracity of all the information indicated there except the name and serial number of Osorio.
Based on the documents, Osorio was at the Army Personnel Management Center (APMC) from May 2005 to July 2006 and was sent as a member of the Philippine contingent to Liberia from July 2006 to March 2007. The abduction took place on June 26, 2006 in Hagonoy, Bulacan.
“It is highly probable that there is an attempt to make it appear that Osorio did not take part in the abduction,” Olalia said, adding that assuming that the assignments are correct, the fact does not exclude that Osorio was probably given a special order.
Mrs. Empeño echoed the same view. “He [Osorio] may have been assigned to a different unit but the higher-ups could always give him a special assignment.” Mrs. Empeño stood by Ramos’s statement.
Empeño said she was disappointed with the Provost Marshal. “He promised to help us, now this.”
Olalia added that even if Osorio was indeed sent to Liberia, he noted that Palparan, too, was sent to Iraq at the time when the international community condemned extrajudicial killings in the Philippines.
“It is probable that this person [Osorio] was pulled off after the incident,” Olalia said.
Speaking to reporters after today’s hearing, Palparan decried “persecution” and branded the move of the complainants as “fishing expedition.” Palparan denied he had met Osorio while he was in active service. He said Osorio only provided security to him when the hearings at the DOJ started.
“It is so easy to deny. Why would you get a security guard whom you did not know?” Mrs. Cadapan said in reaction to Palparan’s statement.
“That is not true,” Ramos who attended today’s hearing said. “Why would I lie? What would I get from lying? In fact, my life has been at risk because of this,” Ramos said in Filipino.
A few days before the third hearing, Ramos said, he received text messages from an anonymous sender. He was barraged with invectives and was warned against testifying in the court. Ramos also said he noticed men tailing him from the Karapatan office to his home in Bulacan.
Ramos said he draws courage from the other witnesses. Besides Ramos, four other witnesses submitted their affidavits.
Reacting to Palparan’s statement that he was being persecuted, Olalia, secretary general of the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL), said: “Pity him. Whether he was in Mindoro or Eastern Visayas or Central Luzon, Palparan left a trail of blood. Saying that those around him are being harassed is the height of arrogance and brazen impunity.”
Hope is alive
After five years of searching, both mothers remain hopeful.
“I see a ray of hope in these hearings,” Mrs. Empeño said.
Mrs. Cadapan said she still sends text messages to one of Sherlyn’s cellphone numbers. “Yesterday, I texted her ‘We miss you for several years already.‘”
Olalia manifested that they will also file an application to place Osorio under the DOJ watch list.
Osorio was given until August 31 to submit his counter-affidavit, the schedule of the next hearing.
Pingback: Another witness tags soldiers in abduction of UP students « Bulatlat
Pingback: Philippines news: Eyewitness to abduction of 2 UP students identifies soldiers as perpetrators | Pinas news library
Pingback: Philippines news: Eyewitness to abduction of 2 UP students identifies soldiers as perpetrators | Pinas.Net
Pingback: Eyewitness to abduction of 2 UP students identifies soldiers as perpetrators - Bulatlat
Pingback: Army intelligence agent, one of the abductors of two UP students – witness : The Philippine Reporter – Toronto Filipino Newspaper Serving the Greater Toronto Area
keep up the good work “brave filipinos”
We should now clean and sweep the PNP, Army, AFP and Government Officials of being corrupt, killers, etc. etc.
mabuhay si P-Noy!
Tuloy lang po ang laban mahirap at mahaba pa ang mamartsahin pero tuloy lang po nasa likod nyo po kami mrs. cadapan, mrs. empeno.
sa awa ng Diyos sanay mabuo ang isang milagro.
sama-sama tayong ipagtanggol ang ating karapatan laban sa nanlalapastangan… pulis man o sundalo ang sangkot… binuhay ako ng tatay ko sa pagsusundalo pero siya mismo di kinokondena ang pang aabuso ng mga kasama niya. saludo ako sa tatay kong sundalo…
i was at the hearing and i took some shots. please feel free to download whatever. i am from the nupl
alam mo ang Military magaling mag-denied, isang pinsan ko pinatay military din ang sankot, yung pamangkin ko police naman ang sabit, ganyan sila kapag alam nila na sasabit na papatayin, kaya ipaglaban nyo yan dapat makulong sila ,saludo ako sa tapang nyo.