U.S.-Arroyo State Terrorism and the Crisis of Comprador-Oligarchic Governance

One anticipates in the next few months the rapid mobilization of conscienticized Filipinos, popular democratic formations, and vast sectors of civil society against Arroyo’s tyranny. As I have suggested earlier, Arroyo’s isolation springs from the confusion of authority with coercive force. This may be categorized as a form of Bonapartism in the periphery when the old ruling class had already lost but the masses have not yet acquired the ability to govern (Poulantzas 1974). Exposed for cheating, lying, and stealing, Arroyo’s autocratic rule can no longer claim even a semblance of legitimacy. Nor can the State apparatus and agencies prostituted by Arroyo claim the mandate that solely emanates from the Filipino people, assuming that a constitutional democratic republic is still the framework of governance.

The Arroyo regime’s moral bankruptcy and political decay have precipitated its total repudiation and condemnation by the Filipino masses (see, for example, the sentiments voiced in the editorial of Daily Tribune Online, August 17, 2006). Civil liberties promulgated in the 1987 Constitution and by the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, however, can only be guaranteed by organized public demonstrations, street rallies, strikes, and other visible enactment or exercise of social and civic rights. Revolution is precisely the concrete sequence of events, the process of transformation of the system, in the totality of its sociohistorical determinations (Therborn 1980). Progressive sectors must appeal to all peoples around the world concerned with justice, democracy, and human dignity to express solidarity with the Filipino people in overthrowing the U.S.-backed Arroyo regime, releasing all political prisoners, and restoring full and genuine sovereignty to the Filipino people. Posted by Bulatlat



Agcaoili, Fidel. 2006. “NDFP Human Rights Committee Spurns GMA-created Commission.” Press Release, 22 August 2006. www.e-balita.com

Ahmad, Eqbal. 2001. Terrorism: Theirs and Ours. New York: Seven Stories Press.

Amnesty International. 2006. “Philippines: Political Killings, Human Rights and the Peace Process (Summary).” Amnesty Index: ASA 35/009/2006. http://www.amnestyinternational.com

Asia Human Rights Commission. “Philippines: Law needed to stop torture and systematic negligence in the Philippines.” Statement dated March 31, 2006.

McCoy, Alfred. 2000. Closer Than Brothers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Macpherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mahajan, Rahul. 2002. The New Crusade: America’s War on Terrorism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Petras, James and Robin Eastman-Abaya. 2006. “Philippines: Killing Fields of Asia.” Campo Antiimperialista (18 March).

Philippine Aidwatch Network. 2005. “Stop all foreign aid to the Philippine military!” Flyer distributed by IBON, June 7, 2005.

Poulantzas, Nicos. 1974. Fascism and Dictatorship. London: Verso.

San Juan, E. 2000. After Postcolonialism: Remapping Philippines-United States Confrontations. Lantham,MD: Rowman and Littlefield,Inc.

—-. 2002. Only By Struggle: Reflections on Philippine Culture, Politics and Society. Quezon City: Giraffe Books.

Scarpello, Fabio. 2006. “U.S., Philippines Weigh New Military Marriage.” Asia Times (August 23). http://www.atimes.com /atimes/Southeast_Asia/HH23Ae01.html

Scruton, Roger. 1982. A Dictionary of Political Thought. New York: Hill & Wang.

Sison, Jose Maria and Julieta De Lima. 1998. Philippine Economy and Politics. Manila: Aklat ng Bayan Publishing House.

Therborn, Goran. 1980. Science, Class and Society. London: Verso.

Thomas, Clive Y. 1984. The Rise of the Authoritarian State in Peripheral Societies. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Tuazon, Bobby. 2006. “Macapagal-Arroyo’s ‘Silent War’ Vs. the Left.” Bulatlat 6.27 (Aug. 13-19).

Wertheim, W.F. 1974. Evolution and Revolution. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.

Share This Post